<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Great HD Line-up!&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16437767</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:03:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:03:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Great HD Line-up!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16438859</link>
<description><![CDATA[cwh posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1320486" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1320486');">Enlightener</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>That's the point.... U-verse is pointless without multiple HD streams.  <br></DIV>So this all boils down to the size of their HD stream and their willingness to keep looplengths short/use pair bonding.  I really doubt there is going limit of 1 HD stream.  <br><br><div class="bquote">In fact when going from traditional broadcast to point to point transmissions DVRs in general become pointless.  CPE DVRs should be replaced with Head-End DVR to make the most effecient use of bandwidth.<br> </DIV>This is far better option than a CPE DVR.  But that seems like it is going to be legal battle between the telecoms and the TV companies.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16438859</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:06:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Great HD Line-up!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16438804</link>
<description><![CDATA[Enlightener posted : That's the point.... U-verse is pointless without multiple HD streams.  <br><br>In fact when going from traditional broadcast to point to point transmissions DVRs in general become pointless.  CPE DVRs should be replaced with Head-End DVR to make the most effecient use of bandwidth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16438804</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:57:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Great HD Line-up!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16438763</link>
<description><![CDATA[cwh posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1320486" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1320486');">Enlightener</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Supposedly 1 HD Stream... oh yeah... :(<br> </DIV>If that is the case, why will they be providing a HD DVR in the future?  Seems kinda pointless if they can only do 1 HD stream.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16438763</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:50:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Great HD Line-up!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16437961</link>
<description><![CDATA[Enlightener posted : Supposedly 1 HD Stream... oh yeah... :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16437961</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:33:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Great HD Line-up!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16437846</link>
<description><![CDATA[icp1 posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/303545" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=303545');">UofMiamiGrad</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>I must say nice SD channel line-up, now where is the HD?  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.uverseusers.com/myimg/channel_guide/30.06.2006.cg.large.jpg" >www.uverseusers.com/myim &middot;&middot;&middot; arge.jpg</A> Perhaps bigger pipes to the customer's premises would help, hint hint, FTTH! I don't see this being successful at all in the long run, speeds cable can beat and no HD at all on the line-up, what a waste of $$$.  :(<br> </DIV>HD is supposedly in fall.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16437846</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:10:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Great HD Line-up!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16437797</link>
<description><![CDATA[rkrocha posted : yep, where is the HD? is the bandwidth not there yet since this is IPTV not cable'esque'...I talk to folks all the time about providers...uverse wont be getting a recommendation from me without HD.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Great-HD-Lineup-16437797</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:59:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Great HD Line-up!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Great-HD-Lineup-16437767</link>
<description><![CDATA[UofMiamiGrad posted : I must say nice SD channel line-up, now where is the HD?  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.uverseusers.com/myimg/channel_guide/30.06.2006.cg.large.jpg" >www.uverseusers.com/myim &middot;&middot;&middot; arge.jpg</A> Perhaps bigger pipes to the customer's premises would help, hint hint, FTTH! I don't see this being successful at all in the long run, speeds cable can beat and no HD at all on the line-up, what a waste of $$$.  :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Great-HD-Lineup-16437767</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:52:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
