said by digitalfutur:And yet water vapour accounts for 70% of the "greenhouse effect" compared to 9% tops for CO2 but where is the water vapour treaty? And where is the treaty that applies to
all nations regarding CO2?
Ya know, 30 years ago we all thought Chlorofluorocarbons were inert and environmentally harmless too. Up til that point we were happily spraying them from aerosol cans and leaking refrigerators into the environment, absolutely certain they were doing us no harm. Have you been outside recently without your SPF 50 sunblock?
Idiotic doubting Thomases, naysayers and oil company shills are going to keep on burying the global warming issue with "junk science" for as long as they possibly can to keep earning profits on a balance sheet. The truth is that these are serious warning signs that our world's environment is in danger and even if there is a slight chance of error, it remains best that we err on the side of prudence and caution.
It's a shame that so many supposedly intelligent corporate and government leaders can't see beyond the decade or two remaining to their lives and careers to stand up for what's right and try and save the planet for the next generation and the one after that (assuming there still is an environment by then.) Meanwhile they keep on spreading FUD until the debate becomes a meaningless exchange of noise and nobody gives a damn any longer.
Makes me damned proud that I never had kids though.
Perhaps the world won't last any longer than I will, but at least I have no investments in the future to lose.
