<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;The deal here is?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-deal-here-is-16882164</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:07:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:07:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16884969</link>
<description><![CDATA[pa_grape posted : I can see that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16884969</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:21:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16884570</link>
<description><![CDATA[Skippy25 posted : I didn't expand on my whole thought. I think this network should be ran by 1-3 companies with great government oversite. I would prefer a private company, but a corporation would be fine as long as the oversight is there.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16884570</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:25:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16883485</link>
<description><![CDATA[pa_grape posted : I'd be afraid the government agency needed to run such a nationwide network would be just as greedy as corp/stock holders, but with no incentives to compete either.<br><br>I'd also be afraid to rely on a government agency to repair, upgrade, and invest in newer infrastructure. (You think big corporations are slow to invest...)<br><br>Also, with who's money would the government be using to run and administrate such a network. Not mine I hope.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16883485</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:27:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16883158</link>
<description><![CDATA[Skippy25 posted : Apparantly I don't because I am still for one nationwide network that all providers can access to reach any customer in any market for any service they want to offer.<br><br>Call me crazy, but I think this is the only "fair" way that will actually be beneficial to the consumers of this country and not the greedy corp/stock holders.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16883158</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:36:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882864</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Knock yourself out.  I prefer to live in the real world.  You can keep your fantasy "government is good" life far away from the bright lights and harsh economic climate.<br><br>In case you were sleeping for the last six years, Ameritech was required to separate the ISP and the DCLEC and the ILEC <U>by the very regulators</U> you seem to think have the inclination, ability or energy to provide you with your idyllic broadband utopia where the government owns the facilities and everyone leases access.<br><br>You have no facts to back up your claims, so you keep shrieking louder and louder.  Guess what?  The rest of us know better.<br><br>My "favorite ILEC"?  You can certainly do better than that.  Or maybe you can't.<br><SMALL>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882864</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:46:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882821</link>
<description><![CDATA[67845017 posted : Then how do you manage to get by?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882821</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:40:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882630</link>
<description><![CDATA[kapil posted : Frankly, Doc, that is a fight that needs to be fought.<br><br>Your favorite ILEC sells its DSL at a loss to kill competition. It's all a lie. The true cost is higher because resellers pay MORE than retail customers for ATT DSL. ATT also claims that the ISP is somehow a different legal entity than the phone company...when everyone except the regulators ATT keeps in its pockets know the truth.<br><br>The real price of DSL, alas, is much closer to what Covad is charging...mostly because the tons of outdated regulation the FCC insists on keeping around.<br><br>It is high time the ILECs be broken into pieces...give the infrastructure to local municipalities...and make all LECs, the I and the C kind lease the facilities from local government...level playing field for all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882630</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:10:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882624</link>
<description><![CDATA[morbo posted :  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882624</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:09:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882251</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Why would any body $65 for phone and a speed of 1.5 when you can get up 8 and phone for 3 dollars more.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882251</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:03:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882530</link>
<description><![CDATA[pa_grape posted : Great point, RadioDoc! Couldn't have said it better myself.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882530</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:56:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882314</link>
<description><![CDATA[67845017 posted : lol.<br><br>Thanks, I wasn't sure if my IQ was tuned at about 100 points less this morning.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882314</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:23:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882281</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Why, you get to stick it in the eye of the ILEC with a substandard, overpriced offering from a CLEC!  Fight the good fight!  Put up with horrid service on principle!<br><br>So far people are mostly staying away in droves due to the price and the fact that Earthlink can't bail fast enough to save it's sinking ship.<br><SMALL>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-deal-here-is-16882281</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:17:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The deal here is?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-deal-here-is-16882164</link>
<description><![CDATA[67845017 posted : I guess I must be missing something.  But, how is the 1.5 Mbps package a deal?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-deal-here-is-16882164</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:57:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
