<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300&#x27; in forum &#x27;ZyXEL&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444386</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:41:50 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:41:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17506281</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Actually, there is a recent firmware update 1.7.  For some reason it didn't show the first time I looked.<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17506281</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:40:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17490666</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Thanks for all the info guys. Been thinking about getting me DGL-4300 for some time now, especially since they have dropped down a fair bit in price lately. Guess I'll pick one up next week. <br><br>As for the lack of firmware updates, I think of 2 reasons for this; 1. As you said, this may be a dead product. 2. They got it working properly from the beginning and updates where simply not needed. <br><br>Haven't found much bad news about this router, so I'm kinda compelled to go with number 2. =)<br><br>Guess I'll find out... ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17490666</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:58:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17467404</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Ok, took about 2 hours to get everything configured, backed up, etc...<br><br>Everything is faster.  Access to my NAS box, RAID 5 server, internet, email, Secureclient tunnels, exchange access via RDP (which doesn't seem to hang as bad now upon disconnect), etc...<br><br>So far, so good!<br><br>Took a while to get it all right.  This router has a TON of settings in it.<br><br>One that tripped me up a bit was the IP/Sec Pass-Thru for my SecureClient tunnel into the office.  With IP/Sec Pass-Thru enabled, I could authenticate to RADIUS, but then the tunnel would fail to initialize.<br><br>I dug through the docs a bit, and apparantly (at least with DLink's implementation), if your VPN Client/System supports NAT Traversal, you have to actually turn this option OFF.<br><br>SecureClient must support NAT Traversal because as soon as I turned off IP/Sec Pass-Thru, I was able to log in successfully.<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17467404</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:52:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17466687</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Guys, this DGL-4300 is the real deal.<br><br>I just did a basic install, and went over to speakeasy to do a test:<br><br>Download Speed: 27437 kbps (3429.6 KB/sec transfer rate)<br>Upload Speed: 2150 kbps (268.8 KB/sec transfer rate)<br><br>I picked up 4mb/sec just by replacing the router.<br><br>So far, I'm quite happy :)<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17466687</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:40:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17461857</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Yeah, I used the THW chart a lot in my research.  Had it printed out and tacked up on the wall as a matter of fact.<br><br>That 30mb/sec is in line with Zyxel's 24mbit rating.  I suspect they are just under promising a bit here to give them some headroom.<br><br>As for the download speeds, I can in fact use every bit of the 25mbit/sec pipe I have, and more if I decide to buy it, due to the number of things I have going on at one time.  Most of the corporate downloads I do from the office servers can easily provide those speeds to me.<br><br>I was part of the Vista CPP, and when I downloaded the ISO I saw transfer rates of 2.89MB/sec if I recall correctly.  I don't care who you are, that's cool :)<br><br>I also had a report from another person who installed one on a 100mbit line, and they had no problems getting 85mbit/sec thru-put from the DGL-4300.<br><br>I'll know more tomorrow as long as UPS does it's job :)<br><br>-Larry<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/226051" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=226051');">bbarrera</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>I'm fairly certain everyone here is aware of reviews at Tom's Networking:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/router-charts/" >www.smallnetbuilder.com/ &middot;&middot;&middot; -charts/</A><br><br>The results should be repeatable. The DGL-4300 and X-550 clock in around 90Mbps for WAN-LAN throughput, and Zywall 2Plus measures around 55Mbps. Click around and you'll see different numbers for LAN-WAN throughput and Total Simultaneous throughput.<br><br>Here are test results from a forum member, the 'firewall off' numbers for Zywall 2 Plus are about 50Mbps (agree with SmallNetBuilder) and the 'firewall on' numbers are about 30Mbps:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,16578578">ZyWALL 2 Plus: Throughput Tests</A><br><br>I had no problems getting 20Mbps downloads and 30Mbps uploads with Zywall 2 Plus on my fiber Internet connection. Its not easy to pull those numbers, most downloads are throttled and even many uploads to mail servers are throttled. It is the rare treat to get a download server that dishes out >10Mbps. On the other hand it is easy to hit the max up/down with a popular torrent file (but don't be surprised with slow downloads with unpopular torrents).<br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17461857</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:58:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17458472</link>
<description><![CDATA[bbarrera posted : I'm fairly certain everyone here is aware of reviews at Tom's Networking:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/router-charts/" >www.smallnetbuilder.com/ &middot;&middot;&middot; -charts/</A><br><br>The results should be repeatable. The DGL-4300 and X-550 clock in around 90Mbps for WAN-LAN throughput, and Zywall 2Plus measures around 55Mbps. Click around and you'll see different numbers for LAN-WAN throughput and Total Simultaneous throughput.<br><br>Here are test results from a forum member, the 'firewall off' numbers for Zywall 2 Plus are about 50Mbps (agree with SmallNetBuilder) and the 'firewall on' numbers are about 30Mbps:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,16578578">ZyWALL 2 Plus: Throughput Tests</A><br><br>I had no problems getting 20Mbps downloads and 30Mbps uploads with Zywall 2 Plus on my fiber Internet connection. Its not easy to pull those numbers, most downloads are throttled and even many uploads to mail servers are throttled. It is the rare treat to get a download server that dishes out >10Mbps. On the other hand it is easy to hit the max up/down with a popular torrent file (but don't be surprised with slow downloads with unpopular torrents).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17458472</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:44:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17458383</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Actually, that's a good idea.<br><br>I'm not entirely sure how to do that, though :)<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17458383</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:25:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17454438</link>
<description><![CDATA[jsimmons posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/576892" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=576892');">TechLarry</a>:</SMALL><br><br>Once it's all set up, I'll let you know how it goes.<br> </DIV>Try setting it up with 2 local LANS - one on the WAN port, one on the LAN side.  Hook up 1 PC on each side of the router and run some FTP tests between them.  Let us know if you <B>really</B> see 90 mbit/sec throughput or anything close. I'm not overly skeptical, but would like to know how well it does.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler."- Albert Einstein</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17454438</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:04:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451837</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Ok, Guys.  Decision made.<br><br>I just pulled the trigger on a DGL-4300.<br><br>90mbit thru-put.<br>Decent Firewall.<br>Decent Wireless G.<br>Gigabit ports.<br>Overall excellent reviews.<br><br>And it was all of $97.<br><br>Once it's all set up, I'll let you know how it goes.<br><br>Thanks for everyone's help!<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451837</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:07:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451822</link>
<description><![CDATA[OGalati posted : If you like filtering, under ZyNOS, you have the Generic Filtering feature, that allows you not only MAC Address filtering, but single byte (even single bit) filtering from the whole Ethernet frame. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451822</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:04:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451696</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : SSID I agree.  Not so sure about MAC filtering, though.<br><br>Yeah, I've read the stories.  And they are probably true, but it's not professional hackers I'm worried about.  They'll get in anyway.<br><br>-Larry<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/431519" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=431519');">Anav</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Macfiltering is useless for security as is hiding essid.<br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451696</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:39:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451686</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Ok, I called Zyxel.<br><br>The rep was just as confused as us by the specs, so he went back to engineering and asked them.<br><br>They told him it was 24mbit/sec, VPN or not.  They said the reason for this was the VPN uses a co-processor that can allow it to use all the available bandwidth the router can pass.<br><br>If this is correct, I'm afraid the Zywall 2 plus is out for me :(<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451686</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:38:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451538</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Macfiltering is useless for security as is hiding essid.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451538</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:13:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451327</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Ah, gotcha...<br><br>Unless my Golden Retrievers or Siamese Cat get all techy on me all of a sudden, I don't have this issue :)<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451327</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:36:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451310</link>
<description><![CDATA[ZyHope posted : <BLOCKQUOTE>The 2 Plus does not have Wireless. MAC filtering is usually used for wireless connections, and the WAP that's attached should have the required MAC filtering capabilties.</BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>I have two WAPs with MAC filtering.  But, to block my kids and their friends from connecting their laptops to our wired LAN (at least without my approval), I think the feature is just as deisrable on a wired LAN as WLAN.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451310</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:34:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451254</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Actually, now that I've thought about this it makes sense.<br><br>The 2 Plus does not have Wireless.  MAC filtering is usually used for wireless connections, and the WAP that's attached should have the required MAC filtering capabilties.<br><br>DOH!<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451254</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:23:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451251</link>
<description><![CDATA[nanobug posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/576892" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=576892');">TechLarry</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>The thru-put numbers still confuse me.  It has a high rating for one packet size.  The rest are only average.<br></DIV>This is true for *ALL* routers. All the NAT+Firewall processing is directed at the header of each packet. Therefore, it doesn't really matter whether the packet is 64 bytes or 1500 bytes because both will take the same amount of time to have their headers processed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451251</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:22:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451241</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : BTW... Just so you guys know why I'm so hung up on the Bandwidth thing....<br><br>I pay quite a bit for a 15mbit/2mbit cable connection.  It actually provides me just under 25mbit downlink (I ain't complaining :) and I need every bit of it.<br><br>At any one time, I have a SecureClient pass-through tunnel running, and also several VNC connections running (some through the Secureclient tunnel, others not via reverse-VNC).<br><br>At the same time my phone is all VOIP, and I service call system up and running as well as a connection to an exchange server, corporate IM system, etc...<br><br>And I only see loads on the bandwidth increasing in the future, thus the need to make sure I'm future-proof up to at least 30mbit.<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451241</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:21:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451230</link>
<description><![CDATA[ZyHope posted : No MAC Address Filtering in the Zywall2 plus? Wow. That sure seems like an obvious omission to me. <br><br>That's my current understanding, but I'm new to the Zywall products just as of October, so I'm still learning and could be wrong.  Perhpas someone else has different knowledge.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451230</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:18:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451180</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Well, it looks like there HAS been a recent US release of firmware for the DGL-4300:<br><br>Firmware  &#9;1.7  &#9;&curren; NAT endpoint filtering enabled.<br>&curren; Removed references to 11n mode under WEP in the Basic Wireless Page as well as the Help file. &#9;11/6/2006<br><br>I could have swore 3 days ago that entry wasn't there, and the latest entry was the 1.6 released in January.<br><br>That improves my vision of the remaining lifespan of the router a bit.<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451180</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:10:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451171</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : That does help a lot!<br><br>No MAC Address Filtering in the Zywall2 plus?  Wow.  That sure seems like an obvious omission to me.  The cheapest routers you can buy have MAC filtering.  I also use it to allow only certain machine's access.<br><br>If only someone here actually had a 2 Plus with a really high-speed connection that could verify the thru-put capabilities.<br><br>I may make a call to Zyxel today.  Gives me a chance to test their tech support :)<br><br>-Larry<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1410504" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1410504');">ZyHope</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Larry,<br>I was in exactly the same boat, considering the DGL-4x00 series verses the Zywall 2+ ... so maybe I'll throw in my 2 cents.<br><br>I too, don't have immediate need for VPN, just VPN pass through.  And, my throughput need was on the order of 20 Mbps.  However, I'm not a big gamer ... so a lot of the advertised features of the DGL-4x00 series weren't as important to me.<br><br>You are correct that the DGL-4x00 hasn't seen a firmware update in almost a year now, but in the UK they have release a 1.7 firmware this past October.  There is significant discussion in the forums as to when or even if this will be released for US products<br><br>For me, the Zywall 2+ won out because I was more interested in security features:<br>- separate the wireless LAN through the firewall from the wired LAN.<br>- while the DGL-4x00 series added content filtering the last firmware release, 1.6 (see release notes for firmware), it is significantly limited in the number of categoies and still in somewhat of a 'beta' stage ... at least compared to Blue Coat.<br><br>For the Zywall 2+, I also liked how they implmented QoS and bandwidth management.<br><br>One thing I would have liked to have seen in the Zywall, that the DGL-4x00 does have, is MAC address filtering.  In my home network, I know the MAC address of every single device, so I'd like to have the option of excluding connection to the network for any MAC that does not match a predefined list of known MACs.<br><br>Just some thoughts ... maybe they help.<br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17451171</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:07:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17450972</link>
<description><![CDATA[ZyHope posted : Larry,<br>I was in exactly the same boat, considering the DGL-4x00 series verses the Zywall 2+ ... so maybe I'll throw in my 2 cents.<br><br>I too, don't have immediate need for VPN, just VPN pass through.  And, my throughput need was on the order of 20 Mbps.  However, I'm not a big gamer ... so a lot of the advertised features of the DGL-4x00 series weren't as important to me.<br><br>You are correct that the DGL-4x00 hasn't seen a firmware update in almost a year now, but in the UK they have release a 1.7 firmware this past October.  There is significant discussion in the forums as to when or even if this will be released for US products<br><br>For me, the Zywall 2+ won out because I was more interested in security features:<br>- separate the wireless LAN through the firewall from the wired LAN.<br>- while the DGL-4x00 series added content filtering the last firmware release, 1.6 (see release notes for firmware), it is significantly limited in the number of categoies and still in somewhat of a 'beta' stage ... at least compared to Blue Coat.<br><br>For the Zywall 2+, I also liked how they implmented QoS and bandwidth management.<br><br>One thing I would have liked to have seen in the Zywall, that the DGL-4x00 does have, is MAC address filtering.  In my home network, I know the MAC address of every single device, so I'd like to have the option of excluding connection to the network for any MAC that does not match a predefined list of known MACs.<br><br>Just some thoughts ... maybe they help.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17450972</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:26:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17450131</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : That's an excellent document.<br><br>It has almost TOO much information though :)<br><br>The thru-put numbers still confuse me.  It has a high rating for one packet size.  The rest are only average.<br><br>If I read it right.<br><br>I read a response elsewhere where one has a DGL-4300 on a 100mbit connection, and it is passing 85mbit/sec at a minimum (off-router tests were not done, so actual pipe not verified to be above 85mbit/sec).<br><br>Hmmm....<br><br>This is really hard :)<br><br>-Larry<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1251943" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1251943');">nanobug</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/576892" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=576892');">TechLarry</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Where did the 70mbps number come from?</DIV>ZyXEL Security Handbook, page 92? :)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.zyxel.de/upload/infomaterial/solutionguides/pdfs/ZyXEL_UTM_handbook_2006.pdf" >www.zyxel.de/upload/info &middot;&middot;&middot; 2006.pdf</A><br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17450131</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:36:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17450116</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Considering they are identical hardware (perhaps less ram in the z2plus) but none of the extra UTM firmware baggage, the Z2plus should be just as capable regarding throughput. One should also check concurrent sessions etc, but have to agree with nanobug and retract my earlier comment, the z2plus seems equally capable of handling FIOS.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17450116</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:31:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17449140</link>
<description><![CDATA[nanobug posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/576892" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=576892');">TechLarry</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Where did the 70mbps number come from?</DIV>ZyXEL Security Handbook, page 92? :)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.zyxel.de/upload/infomaterial/solutionguides/pdfs/ZyXEL_UTM_handbook_2006.pdf" >www.zyxel.de/upload/info &middot;&middot;&middot; 2006.pdf</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17449140</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:03:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17447579</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : I will check some 'other' documentation I have later tonight and post any relevant info here, If I find any.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17447579</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:43:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17446569</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Actually, it's not :)<br><br>Where did the 70mbps number come from?  That's a new one...<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17446569</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:58:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17446415</link>
<description><![CDATA[nanobug posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/576892" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=576892');">TechLarry</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>We may have just leaned towards the DGL-4300.</DIV>Why would that be? Isn't the ZyWALL 2 Plus still faster at 70Mbps maximum throughput?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17446415</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:33:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17446404</link>
<description><![CDATA[nanobug posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/431519" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=431519');">Anav</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>I looked and on pg 88 (table) it states the 2Plus has 24Mbps with firewall on and the zywall 5 rated at 60Mbps with firewall on.</DIV>To me, pag. 88 smells like "marketing" while pag. 92 smells like "real world facts"  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17446404</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:29:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17446289</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Isn't that rating based on the VPN tunnel?  That's what the description seems to infer.<br><br>I never could find a pure Lan-To-Wan Firewall number.  The 50mbit combined number I got from the tests at Toms Networking.<br><br>We may have just leaned towards the DGL-4300.<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17446289</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:09:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17445487</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : I looked and on pg 88 (table) it states the 2Plus has 24Mbps with firewall on and the zywall 5 rated at 60Mbps with firewall on.<br><br>Now Im pretty sure the zywall 5 figure is an additive 2way number and thus still is around 30Mbps one way.  The ZyWALL 2 Plus is a later product and is designed to ADSL2+ capable and thus I suspect the 24Mbps is a more accurate one way number.<br>Any other perspective/info welcome.<br><br>I did note the later test tables (pg 92) which tend to show the Z2plus  as having greater throughput so the previous table may have been based on the zywall 5 pre-UTM????<br><br>All to say, I is confewsed.<br><SMALL>--<br>Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". <br>Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla.  Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"<br><br><A HREF="http://www.llamaworks.ca">LlamaWorks Equipment</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17445487</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:10:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444985</link>
<description><![CDATA[nanobug posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/431519" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=431519');">Anav</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>You would need a ZyWALL 5 to ensure your ready for FIOS 30Mbps.</DIV>According to the ZyXEL Security Handbook (page 92), the ZyWALL 2 Plus is actually a little bit faster than the ZyWALL 5:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.zyxel.de/upload/infomaterial/solutionguides/pdfs/ZyXEL_UTM_handbook_2006.pdf" >www.zyxel.de/upload/info &middot;&middot;&middot; 2006.pdf</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444985</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:46:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444881</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : <STRIKE>You would need a ZyWALL 5 to ensure your ready for FIOS 30Mbps.</STRIKE> seems both z2plus or z5 will do the job.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444881</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444640</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Boy, you guys are fast :)<br><br>Yeah, sorry I forgot to mention...<br><br>I don't have any problems going to a separate WAP.  These days, it's probably better anyway.<br><br>What I was going to do until the whole 802.11n thing shakes out is take the Linksys WRT54GS, put it in Router mode, and turn off the DHCP server, thus turning it into a WAP.  At least I think that's what I would need to do.<br><br>That will carry me over until 802.11n is firm.<br><br>One other thing.  I know the DGL-4300 can handle my Cable Connection ok, as it is shown as the second fastest product available for Wan-Lan thru-put in the TomsHardware charts, and verified by other tests I've seen.<br><br>I'm not entirely sure about the Zywall 2 Plus.  The specs are a bit confusing at Zyxel.  It says 24mbit, but I think that is VPN performance, which isn't nearly as important to me as Firewall Wan-Lan performance.  The TNW chart shows it as aroudn 50mbit.<br><br>I really need to be sure about this part.  My current connection provides me around 24mbit/sec, and the WRT54GS can handle that.  The TNW chart shows it taps out around 34mbit/sec.<br><br>I may move to a 30mbit FIOS connection next year if the prices drop.  I need to make sure the router won't choke on it.<br><br>Thanks :)<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444640</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:48:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444629</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : I really do not do P2P.<br><br>However, my QNAP TS-201 NAS Box does have a Bit-torrent engine in it.  I don't use it much, but sometimes I do download large files with it, mainly archives of Guitar Tabs and such, so it will need to work.<br><br>I guess I should also mention the QNAP has the FTP Server and Media Server (TwonkyMedia)I use occasionally.<br><br>Thanks :)<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444629</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:46:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444456</link>
<description><![CDATA[pkelecy posted : You didn't mention if you needed (or wanted) wireless.  If so, the DGL-4300 would be the obvious choice (unless you were willing to add a separate AP for the Zywall - maybe use your old Linksys?).  Just a thought.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444456</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:14:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444440</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Since you did not state heavy P2P along with the other requests Iwould lean towards the ZyXEL 2Plus.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444440</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:11:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444426</link>
<description><![CDATA[SpookyET posted : ZyXEL X-550, DGL-4300, DI-634M, TrendNET 108 G MIMO are pretty much identical at the core.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/mimo_face/page13.html/" >www.smallnetbuilder.com/ &middot;&middot;&middot; 13.html/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444426</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:09:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Zywall 2 Plus or DLink DGL-4300</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444386</link>
<description><![CDATA[TechLarry posted : Ok, time for a new router.<br><br>I currently have a Linksys WRT54GS which has been a wonderful router, with excellent performance.<br><br>But, it is now 3 years old, and since my livelyhood depends on my network I want to replace it and use the 54GS as an emergency spare.<br><br>I considered another WRT54GS, but Linksys has neutered the 54GS the same way they did with the non-linux Rev 5 of the device :(<br><br>My research has narrowed me down to two possibilities:<br><br>1.  Zywall 2 Plus.<br>2.  DLink DGL-4300.<br><br>My Needs<br>--------<br>Ability to handle 25mbit Cable Connection (and possibly faster).<br>Ability to easily route ports for gaming, RealVNC revers-connections, ftp, etc...<br>VPN Pass-through (SecureClient).<br>Work easily with my ATT CallVantage VOIP (DLink Box).<br><br>At about $125, the DLink DGL-4300 looks really appealing.  it has really amazing thru-put numbers, and includes a Gigabit switch that supports Jumbo Frames (I do have an 8 port Gigabit Switch that supports jumbo frames though).<br><br>One thing that worries me is it is starting to look like this may be a dead product.  There has not been a firmware update for this router in almost a year, and that is usually a sign that a hardware product is on the way out.  There is no such thing as perfection.  There is always something to fix.  Also, it's odd that none of the local retailers carry this apparantly perfect router, and that's odd.<br><br>The Zywall 2 Plus looks very appealing as well, but for different reasons.  It has a much stronger firewall, is much more configurable, and I suspect is a stouter device for the long-haul.  It also appears to be a fresh product that gets frequent firmware updates.<br><br>The extra $50 cost doesn't really bother me.<br><br>What to do?<br><br>Thanks :)<br><br>-Larry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Zywall-2-Plus-or-DLink-DGL4300-17444386</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:01:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
