said by ducky :said by ff1324:said by jtorre69:the end of the first amendment..........
How do you figure that?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Where in there did it say "AT&T" or "businesses"?
The "abridging freedom of speech" part could arguably fall under this, but okay. Laws can't spell out every possible wrong thing you do, common sense is required. Not everyone seems to be capable of it, though.
Constitution or not, this is stupid. I don't know why anyone would get service from AT&T.
Look at ATT trying to get a free pass from the Government because of giving NSA info without going through proper channels.
Look at
»
Why Comcast, AT&T Want Arbitration [71] comments AT&T Want Arbitration
New report finds outfits almost always rule against you...
09:44AM Friday Sep 28 2007 by Karl
tags: legal·business·consumers·Comcast·AT&T DSL Service
As we've recently mentioned, both AT&T and Comcast were slapped down by the courts for trying to include language in your terms of service that would limit your legal rights. Both companies tried to force consumers to take place in arbitration instead of having their grievances heard in a court of law.
---------------------------------------
Sounds like ATT wants to re-write the laws of the land.
LOL What stupidity.
They own the FCC (mister martin)
They want everyone to eat out of there greedy fat fat hands.
As if they don't already have enough money and power controling most of the US as the #1 ranked as far as customers served carrier.
Hah.. Needs more competition.
No more mergers to control people and shut them up.
ATT runs and acts like it is a government.
They need to be busted like Microsoft was anti-trust ... no freedom of choice until cable came around and started offering people choices.
This all sucks.
".