47717768 (banned)
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL |
47717768 (banned)
Member
2008-Feb-6 10:46 pm
NOD32 versionWhat version of NOD32 are you using?
I am still using 2.7,because of bugs found in 3.0 version |
|
 DownTheShoreStay Positive and Test Negative!
Premium Member
join:2003-12-02
Beautiful NJ |
2.7 |
|
Xzar
join:2003-02-16
Yaphank, NY |
to 47717768
3.0 |
|
| |
decomp to 47717768
Anon
2008-Feb-7 2:05 am
to 47717768
2.7 on vista |
|
 tempnexus
Premium Member
join:1999-08-11
Boston, MA
1 edit |
to 47717768
4.06 |
|
 HA Nut
Premium Member
join:2004-05-13
USA |
to 47717768
I use 3.0 at home but at work, we are still at 2.7 and will probably remain so. 3.0 has issues with true client/server Java and the slow downs it causes makes it unusable. So far, Eset has ignored my pleas for an answer...  |
|
|
| |
saffron to 47717768
Anon
2008-Feb-7 7:01 am
to 47717768
said by 47717768:What version of NOD32 are you using? I am still using 2.7,because of bugs found in 3.0 version My own testing of the latest v3.0 and ESS on my home machines indicates they're relatively bug free, a major improvement over the poorly tested earlier versions that IMHO should never have been released to the public, but I'm still using v2.7 in my work environment. I don't think they're THAT bug free yet. YMMV. A lot of people rave about how great the programs are in their present state of development. v2.7 detects just as many malwares as v3.0, so if you're happy with it, stick with it for now. |
|
| |
to 47717768
Still using 2.7. Not ready to test 3.0. |
|
redblkjck
Premium Member
join:2001-11-07
Pasadena, MD |
to 47717768
3.0 should still be in beta testing. Rolled all the 3.0 clients back to 2.7 after too many complaints and fixes. I've been a long time user of NOD32 (50+ clients) and this 3.0 rollout (Symantec like experience) has me concerned about the future of NOD32. |
|
 tmaertinCrash Into Me
Premium Member
join:2002-04-03
North Tonawanda, NY |
to 47717768
2.7 here - i had a lot of problems with the first two versions of 3.0 and wont be going back until more of the bugs are worked out. |
|
| |
planet
Member
2008-Feb-7 10:10 am
2.7 still. Haven't tried 3 due to all the negative fdbk here and wilders. The other issue is the ekrn proxy that filters http traffic and the struggles people voiced with their firewalls. Just seemed too darn complicated to try and sort out. |
|
| |
to 47717768
3.0.630.0 |
|
 Trooper
Premium Member
join:2005-05-18
USA |
to 47717768
Using ESS myself, no issues to report. I am running it on both XP Pro and Windows Vista Business edition. |
|
47717768 (banned)
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL |
47717768 (banned)
Member
2008-Feb-7 4:27 pm
Is it just me or with NOD32 running it's takes longer to install appz. |
|
| |
to 47717768
I'm generally right on my app updates however I'm still running 2.70.39 because of many issues & bugs reported earlier. |
|
| |
2.70.31 on XP and it hasn't failed me yet |
|
| |
to 47717768
Have used both 2.7 and 3.0 with XP Pro. Both worked fine. I'm currently using 3.0 with Vista Home Premium. No problems. I should add that I use the Vista firewall, as third-party firewalls don't always get along with my games. |
|
47717768 (banned)
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL |
47717768 (banned)
Member
2008-Feb-7 7:10 pm
So i am the only one having problem even with 2.7 installing appz just take a long time and i am running XP. |
|
DownTheShoreStay Positive and Test Negative!
Premium Member
join:2003-12-02
Beautiful NJ |
said by 47717768:So i am the only one having problem even with 2.7 installing appz just take a long time and i am running XP. No noticeable lag with Vista Home Premium. Perhaps you need more RAM? That would speed things up.  |
|
47717768 (banned)
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL |
47717768 (banned)
Member
2008-Feb-7 7:36 pm
said by DownTheShore:said by 47717768:So i am the only one having problem even with 2.7 installing appz just take a long time and i am running XP. No noticeable lag with Vista Home Premium. Perhaps you need more RAM? That would speed things up. There is no way i will upgrade to Vista just so NOD32 will work well. |
|
| |
to 47717768
I don't see a slow down or lag installing with Nod 2.7 Comodo 3.0 Boclean, Win XP home with 1.256 GB Ram. |
|
| |
to 47717768
I ran 3.0 when it first came out and didn't really care for it and went back to 2.7 for a whille. Running 3.0 again. Not happy with the proxy but I have it set for applications marked as browsers and email clients.
I can live with it for now. No problems yet on XP SP2. |
|
 SirSteve
Premium Member
join:2003-11-28
Woodbury, CT
1 edit |
to 47717768
2.70.39 on Vista and XP |
|
| |
bcruze
Member
2008-Feb-8 8:58 pm
3..0.621
on vista |
|
 nopingno route to host
Premium Member
join:2007-01-09 |
to 47717768
ESS/3.0 on multiple machines, no problems since the new builds. |
|
| |
to 47717768
3.0.621 on two computers without issue
Desktop, Vista Ultimate
Laptop, XP Pro, SP2 |
|
HA Nut
Premium Member
join:2004-05-13
USA |
to 47717768
I'm still in the testing phase but it appears my Java slowdown issues may have been due to a corrupt installation. I subsequently exported settings from that bad installation to 2 other PCs, messing up all 3. So far, it appears that fixing the original installation and using it's exported settings is working ok... |
|
| |
to 47717768
3.0.621 with no problems whatsoever, on Vista |
|
| |
to 47717768
I wish ESET had a free version of NOD32 Antivirus
that's a good idea, don't you think? |
|
 Dustyn
Premium Member
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN |
to 47717768
NOD32 3.0
There have been no issues to report under Windows Vista x64. |
|
