http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20528937 en Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:54:27 EDT Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:54:27 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20545331
In the TC's first post, the results show that the game server is at fault. The 3rd-to-last hop results should be discarded, or send pings directly to it for accurate results.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20545331 Tue, 27 May 2008 11:25:12 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20544669
So there must be a connection.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20544669 Tue, 27 May 2008 08:09:32 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20540290 said by Ecanem:

guess people know nothing o.O
or simply don't care.

Ping losses in the middle mean absolutely nothing if not reflected at the destination.
--
Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and formal education positively fortifies it. -- Stephen Vizinczey]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20540290 Mon, 26 May 2008 08:37:48 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20540234 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20540234 Mon, 26 May 2008 08:10:07 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20532688
and I got 0 loss. Isnt that very strange considering pingpath still shows the 100/100 result?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20532688 Sat, 24 May 2008 05:41:22 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20532672 Packages: Send = 500, arrived = 487, lost = 13 (2% tab),
Beregnet tid for rundtur i millisekunder:
Minimum = 29ms, Maksimum = 44ms, avarage = 30ms

But here it still goes through the weird 100/100 tiscali hop right? or is this directly?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20532672 Sat, 24 May 2008 05:23:17 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20530582 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20530582 Fri, 23 May 2008 17:40:10 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20530559
if its on my end i'm only happy, because that should mean that there would be a possible solution?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20530559 Fri, 23 May 2008 17:35:46 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529926
p.s: I just pinged 89.149.186.65 directly and im getting 0% loss.. same with 80.95.144.192 and 193.192.58.150]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529926 Fri, 23 May 2008 15:33:40 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529784
Sorry for my lack of knowledge :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529784 Fri, 23 May 2008 15:03:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529714 said by Ecanem:

What should I do? call my isp and tell them to fix it?
Its not your ISP's fault they cant do anything, the only people that can call to get it fixed it are the ones paying them for transit (the server admin of the game server).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529714 Fri, 23 May 2008 14:50:38 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529319 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529319 Fri, 23 May 2008 13:27:16 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529304 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20529304 Fri, 23 May 2008 13:24:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20528937
Here i pathping'ed one of those servers. Could you tell me what the problem is?

C:\Documents and Settings\Menace>pathping 193.192.58.150

Rute spores til 193.192.58.150 over et maksimum af 30 hop

0 dennis-90639a1f.opasia.dk [80.164.3.104]
1 lo1.abnxx10.ip.tele.dk [80.166.136.29]
2 ge1-0-40.1000M.abnxg4.ip.tele.dk [83.88.9.1]
3 pos6-0.2488M.abnxg1.ip.tele.dk [83.88.15.65]
4 pos0-0-3-1.2488M.kd4nqh1.ip.tele.dk [83.88.12.89]
5 pos0-1-3-0.9953M.alb2nqh1.ip.tele.dk [83.88.27.25]
6 te3-2.10G.alb2nxc7.ip.tele.dk [83.88.23.58]
7 cph10.ip.tiscali.net [195.215.109.102]
8 xe-0-0-0.fra20.ip.tiscali.net [89.149.186.65]
9 80.95.144.192
10 193.192.58.150

Beregner statistik i 250 sekunder...
Kilde tilher Dette node/Dette link
Hop RTT Tabt/Sendt = Pct Tabt/Sendt = Pct Adresse
0 dennis-90639a1f.opasia.dk [80.164.
3.104]
0/ 100 = 0% |
1 33ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% lo1.abnxx10.ip.tele.dk [80.166.136
.29]
0/ 100 = 0% |
2 15ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ge1-0-40.1000M.abnxg4.ip.tele.dk [
83.88.9.1]
0/ 100 = 0% |
3 13ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% pos6-0.2488M.abnxg1.ip.tele.dk [83
.88.15.65]
0/ 100 = 0% |
4 19ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% pos0-0-3-1.2488M.kd4nqh1.ip.tele.d
k [83.88.12.89]
0/ 100 = 0% |
5 22ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% pos0-1-3-0.9953M.alb2nqh1.ip.tele.
dk [83.88.27.25]
0/ 100 = 0% |
6 22ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% te3-2.10G.alb2nxc7.ip.tele.dk [83.
88.23.58]
0/ 100 = 0% |
7 22ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% cph10.ip.tiscali.net [195.215.109.
102]
3/ 100 = 3% |
8 --- 100/ 100 =100% 97/ 100 = 97% xe-0-0-0.fra20.ip.tiscali.net [89.
149.186.65]
0/ 100 = 0% |
9 33ms 3/ 100 = 3% 0/ 100 = 0% 80.95.144.192
3/ 100 = 3% |
10 33ms 6/ 100 = 6% 0/ 100 = 0% 193.192.58.150]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Loss-problem-interpretation-of-pathping-20528937 Fri, 23 May 2008 12:19:10 EDT