<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;gg 50,000 ms latency&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/gg-50000-ms-latency-22851423</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:01:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:01:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22882910</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : Not quite 50,000 ms but 1000-2000 is typical for WB, with spikes to 3000 at times. On HN it sounds like latency is lower, but I've seen 1000+ routinely there as well :/]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22882910</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:41:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22864796</link>
<description><![CDATA[dbirdman posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1407396" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1407396');">Kord</a>:</small><br><br>Hows the HTTPS pages do? Most companies use a secure site for remote access<br> </div>Don't confuse the two. HTTPS websites are very poor over consumer-grade satellite, because the latency DOES get in the way. You can't, or at least you shouldn't, proxy a secure site since the proxy would have to be able to "read" the data. So every element of the connection will involve request/response. I hate dealing with PayPal over satellite, which I have to do a lot. At least my commercial-grade satellite is a bit better, but still poor.<br><br>Secure business connections (VPN), whether done over SSL, IPSec, PPTP, or whatever, are not nearly as bad as dealing with a secure webpage. They take longer to establish than they would over terrestrial, but once connected they move reasonably well. IPSec won't work over Hughes without a static IP, since their routers don't handle passthrough. I've used PPTP with Hughes fairly well, but prefer IPSec over the commercial satellite connection.<br><small>--<br>Motosat self-pointing dishes: 1.2-meter XF-3 on 105W or 121W, .74 meter G74 on 83W, SL-5 HD DirecTV|idirect 3100|Hughes HN7000S|Sprint Air Card|1990 Blue Bird Wanderlodge Bus "Blue Thunder"|Author of PC-OPI and DSSatTool</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22864796</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:43:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22863743</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kord posted : Hows the HTTPS pages do? Most companies use a secure site for remote access<br><small>--<br>I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22863743</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:38:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22858026</link>
<description><![CDATA[dbirdman posted : I understand that was tongue-in-cheek, because we both know that satellite ISPs are ISPs their customers love to hate. What is important to note as you read the reviews is that very few (if any) mention web browsing as a problem. <br><br>Issues primarily come from three sources:<br><br>FAP, which is what it is, take it or leave it.<br>Speeds way below expected averages experienced by some percentage of users.<br>Desire to use the system for things it isn't going to work for, including streaming video, P2P, etc.<br><br>The second one is the one that is most deserving of attention - at any given time there are always a few Hughes gateways that are performing very badly. No amount of complaints from anyone ever get them fixed - sometimes it is months before the gnome in the bunker who is the only one who can do anything notices that it has a problem - no lower-level employee is allowed to talk to him.<br><br>I found myself on one of those a month ago on my Hughes account. The advantage I have, as do about 10K other mobile users with reseller accounts, was that a 2-minute phone call and a 1-hour wait got me moved to another satellite (the only way known to force a gateway change). Since my dishes are auto-pointing it is not necessary to involve an installer.<br><br>Don't get me wrong, I always go through some withdrawal when I leave my DSL connection and hit the road, but it only takes a few days to adjust. I just spent a couple of weeks in Jasper and Banff National Parks in the Canadian Rockies, and I was likely the only one for miles around with an internet connection, not to mention a working telephone, since cell service is non-existent up in the icefields.<br><small>--<br>Motosat self-pointing dishes: 1.2-meter XF-3 on 105W or 121W, .74 meter G74 on 83W, SL-5 HD DirecTV|idirect 3100|Hughes HN7000S|Sprint Air Card|1990 Blue Bird Wanderlodge Bus "Blue Thunder"|Author of PC-OPI and DSSatTool</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22858026</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:23:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22857935</link>
<description><![CDATA[dneiding posted : Great explanation.  I guess that explains why we see such raving reviews regarding satellite ISPs :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22857935</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:09:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22852872</link>
<description><![CDATA[dbirdman posted : Nope. Hughes has one of the best web proxies in the business. The NOC end packages up the entire page in a compressed package that is doled out by the modem as the browser requests the elements. <br><br>I use a lot of connections over the course of time, including an office T-1 and a home 6-meg DSL, and the Hughes connection serves a complex web page as fast as any of them. The "hesitation" before the entire page suddenly shows up can be a bit misleading, but put a clock on it and you will see.<br><br>My iDirect connection, which has significantly higher speeds and latency at the bottom-end of satellite-theoretical (~550ms), has no proxy and thus sucks for web pages. It does, however, work fine for VPN and VoIP which are important to me.<br><small>--<br>Motosat self-pointing dishes: 1.2-meter XF-3 on 105W or 121W, .74 meter G74 on 83W, SL-5 HD DirecTV|idirect 3100|Hughes HN7000S|Sprint Air Card|1990 Blue Bird Wanderlodge Bus "Blue Thunder"|Author of PC-OPI and DSSatTool</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22852872</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:54:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22852570</link>
<description><![CDATA[dneiding posted : But that 800ms latency is a killer for normal Web browsing where many round-trips are made in order to display a Web page.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22852570</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:43:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22852118</link>
<description><![CDATA[dbirdman posted : Just in case someone actually would take you seriously there are two fallacies. One is the amount of latency - on Hughes typical is 800ms. The more important one is that latency is meaningless for the downloading of a large file. Files come through at full speed once requested, meaning the start of the download might be about 1 second longer than with terrestrial broadband, but otherwise it will take the same amount of time as it would on a similar DSL or other connection that operates in the 1-1.5Mbps range.<br><br>As an aside regarding the AMC-15 issue, that satellite looks pretty full when seen from a spectrum analyzer. As my sig shows it is one of the satellites I use for connection on an iDirect (KU) system.<br><small>--<br>Motosat self-pointing dishes: 1.2-meter XF-3 on 105W or 121W, .74 meter G74 on 83W, SL-5 HD DirecTV|idirect 3100|Hughes HN7000S|Sprint Air Card|1990 Blue Bird Wanderlodge Bus "Blue Thunder"|Author of PC-OPI and DSSatTool</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-gg-50000-ms-latency-22852118</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:06:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>gg 50,000 ms latency</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/gg-50000-ms-latency-22851423</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hpower posted : I laugh every time I see the HughesNet commercial. <br><br>So easy to install and so fast<small>not</small> that you'll be forced take a vacation when you download a 1MB file with the 50,000ms latency! <br><small>--<br>The Internet is about to go down....it is actually.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/gg-50000-ms-latency-22851423</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:45:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
