dslreports logo
uniqs
10

bulletsam
join:2008-04-08
Charleston, IL

bulletsam to kwbelt1

Member

to kwbelt1

Re: Has anyone seen the 'bill shock' warning?

Nope! I doubt I'll be seeing it... ever. These are my meter readings on Ultra 50 for past 3 months. I'm 'grandfathered in' too.

Clever Name
Premium Member
join:2005-05-06
Davenport, IA

Clever Name

Premium Member

Why spend the money for 50mpbs if you download so little? Possibilities : 1. Multiple simultaneous users in the house, but that wouldn't support the monthly download figures. 2. Uh...money to burn?

bulletsam
join:2008-04-08
Charleston, IL

bulletsam

Member

said by Clever Name:

Why spend the money for 50mpbs if you download so little? Possibilities : 1. Multiple simultaneous users in the house, but that wouldn't support the monthly download figures. 2. Uh...money to burn?

Uh... maybe I got a deal on Ultra 50 @ $59.95 for 1 year? which, was only $4.00 more per month than I paid for the 22/2 package I was on.

Yep, money to burn.
Clever Name
Premium Member
join:2005-05-06
Davenport, IA

Clever Name

Premium Member

Well ok I guess I'm not a mind reader. Such a light user paying the regular $95-110 a month would be stupid.

bulletsam
join:2008-04-08
Charleston, IL

bulletsam

Member

Maybe they enjoy the extra speed? I mean, you have to admit that the extra bandwidth does help regardless of how much the customer uses it. That's why we have choices.

However, $79.95 is still too high, IMHO.
hdtv00
join:2003-06-13
Silvis, IL

hdtv00

Member

It's to high when they makeup some bullshit fee to add $15 onto any account that doesn't have cable or stupid phone service.

IowaMan
Premium Member
join:2008-08-21
Grinnell, IA

IowaMan to bulletsam

Premium Member

to bulletsam
I agree $69.95 OK $79.95 NO