dslreports logo
Search similar:


uniqs
10724

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

Multiple routers - same network

I have just moved. I now have ATT DSL. The provided me with a dsl modem/router. I also added 2 more routers via hard lines. However I am having some trouble with the wireless. I am almost positive it is my settings. I read around the internet and most sites agree that using the same SSID, password and channel is the way to set everything up. My main router and two additional routers all have seperate IP addesses. What am I doing wrong?

SoonerAl
MVM
join:2002-07-23
Norman, OK

SoonerAl

MVM

Here is a FAQ that explains this...

»Wireless Networking Forum FAQ »Using a Wireless Router as an Access Point

Use different channels, same SSID and encryption type/key (password)...

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

ok i changed channel...3,5,7. i have same ssid, now connection is not working at all.

John Galt6
Forward, March
Premium Member
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp

John Galt6

Premium Member

Try 1, 6, 11...
John Galt6

John Galt6 to grendel54

Premium Member

to grendel54
.

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

when i changed the channels all to channel 11..then the wireless began working again.

i have a felling i will still be getting dropend connections

i dont know if this makes a difference but all 3 are running different rates...one is 54, the other 72, and finally 144.

sbconslt
join:2009-07-28
Los Angeles, CA

sbconslt to grendel54

Member

to grendel54
Just putting the devices on the same wireless service set and security settings won't work by itself no matter what channels you put them on. You're doing part of what's necessary but not the other parts.

To get them to bridge the primary network, you have to put the devices in access point mode, as opposed router mode, either via presets (if they have such presets) or by changing the right settings to the right values manually, and you have to establish the cable connections in a specific way too.

See here »Wireless Networking Forum FAQ »Using a Wireless Router as an Access Point as given above.

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

i put the secondary routers to have no dhcp

John Galt6
Forward, March
Premium Member
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp

John Galt6 to grendel54

Premium Member

to grendel54
said by grendel54:

when i changed the channels all to channel 11..then the wireless began working again.

Put them on different channels...

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

i used 1,6,11 it seems to be working...we will see what happens in the next couple of days. is there anyway to see what access point im using since all have the same ssid?

sbconslt
join:2009-07-28
Los Angeles, CA

sbconslt

Member

NM

natedj
Elected
Premium Member
join:2001-06-06
Irmo, SC

natedj to grendel54

Premium Member

to grendel54
Might want to run »www.metageek.net/product ··· nssider/ to get an idea of what other signals are in the area and what channel they're on.

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

ya ive run iinsider...not getting much interference. I am using th whole band on channels though...only 2 or 3 from neighbors. im still having trouble with the wireless...it works but very slow at times. ping timeouts sometimes.

natedj
Elected
Premium Member
join:2001-06-06
Irmo, SC

natedj to grendel54

Premium Member

to grendel54
Are you wired connections fine? Is it just you wireless connections that's acting up?

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

yes

billaustin
they call me Mr. Bill
MVM
join:2001-10-13
North Las Vegas, NV

billaustin

MVM

Try setting all three of them to use 802.11 b/g mixed mode (54mbps). Use the same security setup, SSID, and password on each unit. Use a different channel on each unit, pick from 1, 6, and 11. Scan the area around each unit with InSSIDer, and assign the channel that is least likely to receive outside interference. Don't use the same channel on any of the units, unless they are far enough apart that they won't interfere with each other. InSSIDer is a great tool, take advantage of it.

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

»www.speedtest.net/my-res ··· 43936486

Wireless connection next to main router...other routers seem to be giving me the probs
grendel54

grendel54

Member

ive checked the channels...im pretty good on what they are set at...i believe, although i am not certain...the two satelite routers are the ones giving me the problems...i seem to be able to connect to wireless near the main router but nowhere else.
grendel54

grendel54

Member

Sorry for all the confusion...apparently my brother when he ran the hardline used 2 pairs (?) basically he used one cat6 cable to run two seperate lines. The line was split, one into a set top box and the other into the router. I simply swapped out the two lines and the router is now working. It makes me wonder about this split connection though...does it really work?

Fraoch
join:2003-08-01
Cambridge, ON
SmartRG SR808ac
TP-Link EAP225
Grandstream HT502

Fraoch

Member

said by grendel54:

Sorry for all the confusion...apparently my brother when he ran the hardline used 2 pairs (?) basically he used one cat6 cable to run two seperate lines. The line was split, one into a set top box and the other into the router. I simply swapped out the two lines and the router is now working. It makes me wonder about this split connection though...does it really work?

Split how? The only viable way to "split" ethernet is through a switch. 1 in, 2 (or more) out. If it was done any other way you may have problems.

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

not sure how he did it...he works for at&t. he said bothe ends are split to two different lines.

wireless still not working properly

billaustin
they call me Mr. Bill
MVM
join:2001-10-13
North Las Vegas, NV

billaustin to grendel54

MVM

to grendel54
said by grendel54:

Sorry for all the confusion...apparently my brother when he ran the hardline used 2 pairs (?) basically he used one cat6 cable to run two seperate lines. The line was split, one into a set top box and the other into the router. I simply swapped out the two lines and the router is now working. It makes me wonder about this split connection though...does it really work?

This can work, but is not recommended. Usually, the best thing to do would be to correctly terminate the cable ends and add switches to connect the multiple devices.

Pictures would help. What is each split on each end of the cable connected to? How long is the cable run?

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

Click for full size
Here is what it looks like...
cable run is probably 75-100ft

Well I found out why I was having some problems...
1. I was using the same IP as a Router my cousin had setup in my grandfather's room. I changed the SSID on that router and made it a part of the whole network.

2. My router was set to DHCP on and the other router was trying to use it as the DHCP...rookie mistake. I swear I turned it off. Anyhow everythign is working now

Crossing my fingers.

I have 3 routers...two setup as "access points" (they are routers with DHCP turned off acting as a switch and a wireless gateway.
All 3 routers are on one SSID but 3 different channels...1,5,& 11. I would really like to maximize my connection...are their any other settings that I can change to help my network have a more stable faster connection?

billaustin
they call me Mr. Bill
MVM
join:2001-10-13
North Las Vegas, NV

billaustin

MVM

said by grendel54:

I have 3 routers...two setup as "access points" (they are routers with DHCP turned off acting as a switch and a wireless gateway.
All 3 routers are on one SSID but 3 different channels...1,5,& 11. I would really like to maximize my connection...are their any other settings that I can change to help my network have a more stable faster connection?

The only other thing to do would be to survey the area around each AP using InSSIDer and confirm the channel it is set to is the one with the least amount of outside interference. Also, since you are using all the channel space, keep your wireless speed at 150mb or below (single channel use). If you try to run 300mb wireless (dual channel use), your AP's may interfere with each other.
billaustin

billaustin to grendel54

MVM

to grendel54
said by grendel54:

Here is what it looks like...
cable run is probably 75-100ft

I'm assuming the other end of the cable run looks similar. He split the pairs and used one cable run to provide two ethernet connections. It is cheaper to do, and will work, but it would be better to use a switch at each end to connect the devices.

Fraoch
join:2003-08-01
Cambridge, ON
SmartRG SR808ac
TP-Link EAP225
Grandstream HT502

Fraoch to grendel54

Member

to grendel54
said by grendel54:

All 3 routers are on one SSID but 3 different channels...1,5,& 11. I would really like to maximize my connection...are their any other settings that I can change to help my network have a more stable faster connection?

Why are you using channel 5? As you see from the graphic John Galt posted, the channel spread comes quite close to the spread from channel 1 at 20 MHz - if you're using 40 MHz channels it'll definitely interfere.

Use channel 6 if you can - it won't interfere with channels 1 and 11.

grendel54
join:2003-11-14
Glendale, CA

grendel54

Member

bill,
currently running only single band.
im not sure what the other end looks like. It is in the attic. I know their are two lines coming down from the attic and i am assuming it looks the same as the pic i took.
my next (networking) project is to run another cat5 through the attic to my grandfathers room eliminating the AC wiring Plug Link. Once I am up there I can see what it looks like.

fraoch,
i will change it to 6.

thanks everyone for the help.