dslreports logo
uniqs
25
lowping
join:2013-08-04

lowping to andyb

Member

to andyb

Re: Tired of hearing about how good others have got it with internet ...

said by andyb:

Nearly 20 million people live in a line from east to west.Density is farce

That's a far cry from population density. Seoul alone has half of that.
PX Eliezer1
Premium Member
join:2013-03-10
Zubrowka USA

PX Eliezer1

Premium Member

said by lowping:

said by andyb:

Nearly 20 million people live in a line from east to west.Density is farce

That's a far cry from population density. Seoul alone has half of that.

GTA has regional population of 6 million, and is quite dense.

(Some of the people as well).

ruddypict
join:2010-03-24

ruddypict

Member

said by PX Eliezer1:

said by lowping:

said by andyb:

Nearly 20 million people live in a line from east to west.Density is farce

That's a far cry from population density. Seoul alone has half of that.

GTA has regional population of 6 million, and is quite dense.

(Some of the people as well).

The Quebec/Windsor Corridor has 18 million people in a very narrow band. It has the highest population density in Canada and is comparable to highly populated centers in the US.

IIRC Canada's population is ~35million. That means that more than half are in Quebec/Windsor alone.
lowping
join:2013-08-04

lowping to PX Eliezer1

Member

to PX Eliezer1
said by PX Eliezer1:

said by lowping:

said by andyb:

Nearly 20 million people live in a line from east to west.Density is farce

That's a far cry from population density. Seoul alone has half of that.

GTA has regional population of 6 million, and is quite dense.

(Some of the people as well).

It's not really that dence at all, GTA is like 10 times bigger then Seoul.

Gone
Premium Member
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON

1 edit

Gone

Premium Member

said by lowping:

It's not really that dence at all, GTA is like 10 times bigger then Seoul.

There are huge rural swaths along the north-end of what is considered the GTA that skews density numbers. The actual occupied portions of the GTA are quite dense, particularly when compared to US metropolitan areas like Atlanta and Detroit.

Edit - Toronto itself is as dense as most major European cities, and considerably denser than major American cities including New York which is the most dense among them. Just some food for thought.
vincom
join:2009-03-06
Bolton, ON

vincom

Member

said by Gone:

said by lowping:

It's not really that dence at all, GTA is like 10 times bigger then Seoul.

There are huge rural swaths along the north-end of what is considered the GTA that skews density numbers. The actual occupied portions of the GTA are quite dense, particularly when compared to US metropolitan areas like Atlanta and Detroit.

Edit - Toronto itself is as dense as most major European cities, and considerably denser than major American cities including New York which is the most dense among them. Just some food for thought.

ive been saying that for years
lowping
join:2013-08-04

lowping to Gone

Member

to Gone
said by Gone:

said by lowping:

It's not really that dence at all, GTA is like 10 times bigger then Seoul.

There are huge rural swaths along the north-end of what is considered the GTA that skews density numbers. The actual occupied portions of the GTA are quite dense, particularly when compared to US metropolitan areas like Atlanta and Detroit.

Edit - Toronto itself is as dense as most major European cities, and considerably denser than major American cities including New York which is the most dense among them. Just some food for thought.

I'm not sure where you getting your numbers, but I'm seeing New york being 2 times more dence then Toronto.

El Quintron
Fully Magnetized
Premium Member
join:2008-04-28
Tronna
·Bell Fibe Internet

El Quintron to Gone

Premium Member

to Gone
I agree, the argument being made about density is specious at best, it's a somewhat convenient fallacy due to Canada's large landmass.

The truth is, a bit closer to home with regulatory capture, lack of competition, entrenched positions n'all that.

Gone
Premium Member
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON

Gone

Premium Member

It's a stupid argument, even if I read a population density chart incorrectly.

El Quintron
Fully Magnetized
Premium Member
join:2008-04-28
Tronna
·Bell Fibe Internet

El Quintron

Premium Member

said by Gone:

It's a stupid argument, even if I read a population density chart incorrectly.

I somewhat doubt you'd read the charts incorrectly, your posting history indicates a pretty strong attention to detail.

Density is a surface argument at best, a bit of digging invalidates it fairly quickly.

EQ

Gone
Premium Member
join:2011-01-24
Fort Erie, ON

Gone

Premium Member

It was this.

»upload.wikimedia.org/wik ··· sity.JPG

The part I missed was that it was from 1989, so it would have been pre-amalgamation Toronto.
PX Eliezer1
Premium Member
join:2013-03-10
Zubrowka USA

PX Eliezer1 to lowping

Premium Member

to lowping
said by lowping:

I'm not sure where you getting your numbers, but I'm seeing New york being 2 times more dense then Toronto.

Both cities currently have dense mayors....

El Quintron
Fully Magnetized
Premium Member
join:2008-04-28
Tronna
·Bell Fibe Internet

El Quintron to Gone

Premium Member

to Gone
said by Gone:

The part I missed was that it was from 1989, so it would have been pre-amalgamation Toronto.

Fair enough, your point still stands, as far as I'm concerned.