<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;[Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area&#x27; in forum &#x27;Comcast XFINITY&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207335</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:15:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:15:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29213607</link>
<description><![CDATA[train_wreck posted : that ebook  on the HFC plant looks quite interesting, but yowza at $61]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29213607</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:34:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212869</link>
<description><![CDATA[tshirt posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1118186" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1118186');">cypherstream</a>:</said><p>excited to see one as low at 15 MHz.  Curious how that works.  Must be a super clean plant.  I wonder if they are using S-CDMA at that frequency?</p></div> S-CDMA  sure looks like the best way to make use of those low end freqs.<br> Thanks for the links.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212869</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:35:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212725</link>
<description><![CDATA[cypherstream posted : Sometimes at the high end you run a lower modulation or symbol rate because of group delay issues that close to band edge.<br><br>Some amplifiers or systems are built with a return path of 5-40 MHz.  Not every system goes to 42 MHz.  Also sometimes near band edge, around 39 MHz or so, some systems have a return sweep carrier for setting telemetry and getting full equalization from return all the way up to a cw carrier at top band edge.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://books.google.com/books?id=z-cObR6WnMkC&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218&dq=return+path+group+delay&source=bl&ots=K7_WxzvzWh&sig=tV2c1LKrSG3gzvK_aa-ArxV2wcc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TLtfU6jKAqelsASHmYHYDA&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=return%20path%20group%20delay&f=false" >books.google.com/books?i &middot;&middot;&middot; &f=false</A><br><br>I'm excited to see one as low at 15 MHz.  Curious how that works.  Must be a super clean plant.  I wonder if they are using S-CDMA at that frequency?<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://chapter.scte.org/southflorida/files/2010/04/SCTE_D3-Upstream-S-CDMARonHowald.pdf" >chapter.scte.org/southfl &middot;&middot;&middot; wald.pdf</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212725</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:48:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212563</link>
<description><![CDATA[JeepMatt posted : I think you can definitely say that the NW is the hotbed of testing (and implementing) of Internet based improvements.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212563</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:50:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212547</link>
<description><![CDATA[MDA posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1601746" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1601746');">motorola870</a>:</said><p>it isn't that easy to go by:<br>2.560 Ksym = 3.2MHz wide<br>5.120 Ksym = 6.4MHz wide <br></p></div>It should more or less be classified as:<br><br>TDMA = 3.2MHZ wide<br>ATDMA = 6.4MHZ wide<br><br>6.4mhz/ATDMA channels can still be configured for lower symbol rates and different modulations. It just gives the ability for 64 QAM/ 5k symbols. TDMA is limited to 16 QAM/ 2.5k symbols.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212547</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:46:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212490</link>
<description><![CDATA[Johkal posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1878027" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1878027');">train_wreck</a>:</said><p>might be gettin time to starting a "Evidence of 4-channel Upstream" sticky?<br></p></div>We had a long topic reporting this a while back. You will see a lot of variation including those who got 4 & still have them.<br><br>Ref: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r26047253-Signals-Evidence-of-Upstream-Channel-Bonding-Post-Here">[Signals] Evidence of Upstream Channel Bonding - Post Here</A><br><small>--<br>In God we trust; all others bring data!<br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212490</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:22:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212348</link>
<description><![CDATA[RightHere posted : 4th upstream added this morning (Seattle Eastside).<!-- 29212348  HASH(0xa985c60)   --><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=96% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=MIDDLE COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/29212348?c=2162719&ret=64urlL2ZvcnVtL3IyOTIwNzMzNS54bWw"><IMG class="apic" id="p15963" BORDER=0 TITLE="69954 bytes" SRC="/r0/download/2162719.thumb600~5c51f1ff5bcd50df7c0afe8e28d7553d/cm.PNG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29212348</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:16:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211770</link>
<description><![CDATA[Extide posted : I have had 4 upstream here in Taylorsville, UT for a few months now. Probably since at least the beginning of the year if not earlier than that.<br><br>It is interesting because I had a weird setup of 7 down, and 3 up before, and now I am at 8x4.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211770</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:19:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211681</link>
<description><![CDATA[Wayne99021 posted : Just checked again and I do have 4 upstream channels in Mead.<!-- 29211681  HASH(0xa8dbac0)   --><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=96% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=MIDDLE COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/29211681?c=2162683&ret=64urlL2ZvcnVtL3IyOTIwNzMzNS54bWw"><IMG class="apic" id="p15963" BORDER=0 TITLE="83445 bytes" SRC="/r0/download/2162683.thumb600~1d556c02e0121df19a6aa8da28b3406a/4%20Upstream%20Channels.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211681</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:42:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211666</link>
<description><![CDATA[Caddyroger posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1039313" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1039313');">tshirt</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/408904" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=408904');">Caddyroger</a>:</said><p>I just rebooted my modem and got 4 up now. This is in the Tacoma Wa area<br></p></div>can you post a screen shot I'm trying to see the range of freqs in use<br></p></div>Here you go.<br><br> Upstream<br>	UCID 	Freq 	Power 	Channel Type 	Symbol Rate 	Modulation<br>Upstream 1	1	36.80 MHz	45.50 dBmV	DOCSIS2.0 (ATDMA)	5120 kSym/s	64QAM<br>Upstream 2	2	30.30 MHz	45.00 dBmV	DOCSIS2.0 (ATDMA)	5120 kSym/s	64QAM<br>Upstream 3	3	23.80 MHz	45.00 dBmV	DOCSIS2.0 (ATDMA)	5120 kSym/s	64QAM<br>Upstream 4	4	18.90 MHz	44.50 dBmV	DOCSIS2.0 (ATDMA)	2560 kSym/s	64QAM<br><small>--<br>Caddy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211666</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:38:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211530</link>
<description><![CDATA[tshirt posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/408904" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=408904');">Caddyroger</a>:</said><p>I just rebooted my modem and got 4 up now. This is in the Tacoma Wa area<br></p></div>can you post a screen shot I'm trying to see the range of freqs in use]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211530</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:46:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211239</link>
<description><![CDATA[Caddyroger posted : I just rebooted my modem and got 4 up now. This is in the Tacoma Wa area<br><small>--<br>Caddy</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29211239</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:03:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210938</link>
<description><![CDATA[motorola870 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1590874" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1590874');">DarkLogix</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1601746" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1601746');">motorola870</a>:</said><p>amps don't pass higher than 42MHz in most areas in the US for the return path due to the diplex filter at 42MHz-54MHz. future rebuilds will likely go up to 85MHz or 200MHz return.</p></div>and in using that are they running anything around say 48-50MHz or is hitting the top edge of the diplex range problematic?<br></p></div>don't think from 42MHz to 54MHz is used at all in most systems. there may be test stuff in there for plant mantainance but that is it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210938</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:50:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210934</link>
<description><![CDATA[motorola870 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1590874" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1590874');">DarkLogix</a>:</said><p>BTW can someone with better knowledge say is the frequency listed the centerline of the 6MHz channel (as I'd assume) or the top or bottom of it?<br><br>If its the centerline then 37MHz would be 2Mhz from the 42MHz boundary, also is 42Mhz still the boundary?<br></p></div>it isn't that easy to go by:<br>2.560 Ksym = 3.2MHz wide<br>5.120 Ksym = 6.4MHz wide <br><br>no there isn't a 6MHz upstream either only 1.6MHz, 3.2MHz, 6.4MHz or smaller right now.<br><br>and yes the frequency the modem reports is the center of the channel so 38.6MHz is the top of the return in my area before it was 40.2MHz ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210934</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:49:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210931</link>
<description><![CDATA[DarkLogix posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1601746" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1601746');">motorola870</a>:</said><p>amps don't pass higher than 42MHz in most areas in the US for the return path due to the diplex filter at 42MHz-54MHz. future rebuilds will likely go up to 85MHz or 200MHz return.</p></div>and in using that are they running anything around say 48-50MHz or is hitting the top edge of the diplex range problematic?<br><small>--<br>semper idem<br>1KTzRMxN1a2ATrtAAvbmEnMBoY3E2kHtyv</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210931</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:47:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210927</link>
<description><![CDATA[DarkLogix posted : BTW can someone with better knowledge say is the frequency listed the centerline of the 6MHz channel (as I'd assume) or the top or bottom of it?<br><br>If its the centerline then 37MHz would be 2Mhz from the 42MHz boundary, also is 42Mhz still the boundary?<br><small>--<br>semper idem<br>1KTzRMxN1a2ATrtAAvbmEnMBoY3E2kHtyv</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210927</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:46:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210918</link>
<description><![CDATA[motorola870 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1590874" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1590874');">DarkLogix</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/807511" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=807511');">andyross</a>:</said><p>That's a bit weird. It shows the highest frequency at 2.56Msym, but the lowest at 5.12Msym. It's usually the lowest frequency that runs the lower bitrate.<br></p></div>Might be less range available to that one<br>Remember they're about 6MHz in width and AFAIK they still have to stay under the 42MHz boundary, not sure if getting close to it might have issues, but after 42MHz it possibly starts getting tot eh TV stuff.<br><br>also they might be keeping one crappy as they might need one that's more compatible or more resilient for people still on D1.1 and poorly made D2 modems, as these screen shots all show 1 upstream at a lesser rate.<br></p></div>amps don't pass higher than 42MHz in most areas in the US for the return path due to the diplex filter at 42MHz-54MHz. future rebuilds will likely go up to 85MHz or 200MHz return.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210918</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:43:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210914</link>
<description><![CDATA[motorola870 posted : I am in possible soon to be Comcast area and we got 4 upstream bonding on TWC (dallas area):<br>19.4MHz QAM16 TDMA 2.560 Ksym<br>24.2MHz QAM64 ATDMA 5.120 Ksym<br>30.6MHz QAM64 ATDMA 5.120 Ksym<br>37MHz QAM16 ATDMA 2.560 Ksym<br><br>37MHz used to be 5.120 Ksym but TWC changed it to 2.560 Ksym due to standardizing all areas to a similar return path while they rollout upstream bonding.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210914</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:41:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210912</link>
<description><![CDATA[DarkLogix posted : I wonder does my area have a 4th and my SMC just isn't grabbing the lesser one?<br>getting tempted to just buy a SB6141 to use to monitor such status.<br><small>--<br>semper idem<br>1KTzRMxN1a2ATrtAAvbmEnMBoY3E2kHtyv</small><!-- 29210912  HASH(0xa9db6b0)   --><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=96% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=MIDDLE COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/29210912?c=2162642&ret=64urlL2ZvcnVtL3IyOTIwNzMzNS54bWw"><IMG class="apic" id="p15985" TITLE="16606 bytes" BORDER=0 SRC="/r0/download/2162642~04b9029698266b817cb71cce8a16f78d/UpStream.png"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210912</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:41:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210892</link>
<description><![CDATA[DarkLogix posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/807511" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=807511');">andyross</a>:</said><p>That's a bit weird. It shows the highest frequency at 2.56Msym, but the lowest at 5.12Msym. It's usually the lowest frequency that runs the lower bitrate.<br></p></div>Might be less range available to that one<br>Remember they're about 6MHz in width and AFAIK they still have to stay under the 42MHz boundary, not sure if getting close to it might have issues, but after 42MHz it possibly starts getting tot eh TV stuff.<br><br>also they might be keeping one crappy as they might need one that's more compatible or more resilient for people still on D1.1 and poorly made D2 modems, as these screen shots all show 1 upstream at a lesser rate.<br><small>--<br>semper idem<br>1KTzRMxN1a2ATrtAAvbmEnMBoY3E2kHtyv</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210892</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:36:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210880</link>
<description><![CDATA[DarkLogix posted : Still only 3 here, :-(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210880</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:32:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210648</link>
<description><![CDATA[isamudaison posted : Ballard (seattle) area here, 4 channels started last month or so (also, downstream channels have been weird of late)<!-- 29210648  HASH(0xa8db430)   --><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=96% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=MIDDLE COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/29210648?c=2162635&ret=64urlL2ZvcnVtL3IyOTIwNzMzNS54bWw"><IMG class="apic" id="p15963" BORDER=0 TITLE="142073 bytes" SRC="/r0/download/2162635.thumb600~68c2ec1864f74ad9673d69ebd0d81d03/signals.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29210648</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:14:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29209823</link>
<description><![CDATA[infodriveway posted : In Bellingham, I have 4 upstream channels (after a restart).<!-- 29209823  HASH(0xa947e10)   --><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=96% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=MIDDLE COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/29209823?c=2162577&ret=64urlL2ZvcnVtL3IyOTIwNzMzNS54bWw"><IMG class="apic" id="p15963" BORDER=0 TITLE="46332 bytes" SRC="/r0/download/2162577.thumb600~95f5fb8979f54540078f845c44abe7ee/Screen%20Shot%202014-04-28%20at%2006.56.08.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29209823</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:06:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29208376</link>
<description><![CDATA[tshirt posted : that's the new one, or reappeared one as we had one numbered 4 a year or so ago but 1 or 2 was missing, never had more than 3 at once.<br> I think the freq/symbol rate is just because it hasn't been <br>"fine-tuned" yet, or maybe to get the D2 modems off the other 3]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29208376</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:18:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29208119</link>
<description><![CDATA[earletp posted : andyross <A HREF="/useremail/u/807511"><i class='fa fa-user'></i></A> It's Portland, what can I say. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29208119</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 10:23:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29208003</link>
<description><![CDATA[andyross posted : That's a bit weird. It shows the highest frequency at 2.56Msym, but the lowest at 5.12Msym. It's usually the lowest frequency that runs the lower bitrate.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29208003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 08:36:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207722</link>
<description><![CDATA[tshirt posted : They shifted or downstreams a month or 2 ago, and it has been somewhat unstable since hoping this is the start back to the stability we had before.<br> If you are effected PLEASE post a screenshot, I'm hoping to figure out what channels are used where.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207722</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 23:33:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207712</link>
<description><![CDATA[Trevor6 posted : We've had a 4th upstream for a month or slightly longer in Sultan.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207712</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 23:28:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207693</link>
<description><![CDATA[earletp posted : To add to the list. they went to four upstream channels here in Portland a couple of months ago.<br><br>Posted by Oregonian <A HREF="/useremail/u/268808"><i class='fa fa-user'></i></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r29019912-">West Linn, OR</A><br><br>Also here's mine<br>[att=1]<br><br>(edited to add a capture of what we had before.)<br>[att=2]<br><br>tshirt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><i class='fa fa-user'></i></A>, We too have noticed things aren't as "smooth" as they usually are. I wouldn't think the change in frequencies is the cause, but more of an indication that work is being done in the background. <br>In the past, I've found it is best to just wait it out. They get things sorted eventually.<!-- 29207693  HASH(0xa95a420)   --><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=96% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=MIDDLE COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/29207693?c=2162391&ret=64urlL2ZvcnVtL3IyOTIwNzMzNS54bWw"><IMG class="apic" id="p15963" BORDER=0 TITLE="42729 bytes" SRC="/r0/download/2162391.thumb600~ec7b1cc9a7f1a8fbf94d295207904b84/signal1.PNG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=MIDDLE COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/29207693?c=2162434&ret=64urlL2ZvcnVtL3IyOTIwNzMzNS54bWw"><IMG class="apic" id="p15963" BORDER=0 TITLE="56461 bytes" SRC="/r0/download/2162434.thumb600~bd3c2aabdb2a5b77a9ad8f18ee57c09f/signal.PNG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207693</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 23:19:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207527</link>
<description><![CDATA[Darknessfall posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1878027" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1878027');">train_wreck</a>:</said><p>might be gettin time to starting a "Evidence of 4-channel Upstream" sticky?<br></p></div>We probably want to start looking for a 16 or 24 downstream one too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207527</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 21:37:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207431</link>
<description><![CDATA[train_wreck posted : might be gettin time to starting a "Evidence of 4-channel Upstream" sticky?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207431</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 20:51:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] Re: 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207425</link>
<description><![CDATA[Wayne99021 posted : Still have 3 here on the East side.<br>Is that something they do in the more densely populated areas?<br><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-Re-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207425</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 20:48:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[Signals] 4th upstream added in everett area</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207335</link>
<description><![CDATA[tshirt posted : Channel 4 just added here (required reboot to see) still on 2.560Msym.<!-- 29207335  HASH(0xa5a3308)   --><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=96% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=MIDDLE COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/29207335?c=2162355&ret=64urlL2ZvcnVtL3IyOTIwNzMzNS54bWw"><IMG class="apic" id="p15963" BORDER=0 TITLE="59836 bytes" SRC="/r0/download/2162355.thumb600~1203f16cf41b59aac4cfb4c93dc0e94b/4%20upstreams.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Signals-4th-upstream-added-in-everett-area-29207335</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 19:36:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
