dslreports logo
uniqs
7
BHNtechXpert
The One & Only
Premium Member
join:2006-02-16
Saint Petersburg, FL

BHNtechXpert to InternetJeff

Premium Member

to InternetJeff

Re: [TV] An interesting revelation ...

said by InternetJeff:

That's okay. This is an open forum for all members to opine.

Very true however you are a bit late in the game on this, that ship has long since sailed and it was absolutely hashed re-hashed and hashed again just to make sure we didn't get enough hash the first three times
InternetJeff
I'm your huckleberry.
join:2001-09-25
.

InternetJeff

Member

said by BHNtechXpert:

said by InternetJeff:

That's okay. This is an open forum for all members to opine.

Very true however you are a bit late in the game on this, that ship has long since sailed and it was absolutely hashed re-hashed and hashed again just to make sure we didn't get enough hash the first three times

No argument there. But ... do you deny that people were told that no channels would be viewable without a DA after a certain date?
BHNtechXpert
The One & Only
Premium Member
join:2006-02-16
Saint Petersburg, FL

BHNtechXpert

Premium Member

Jeff I told you I am not biting this...I meant it. If you wish to talk about it by all means hit me up. The conversion is not complete yet and there are a very very few channels that must remain where they are for a short period of time however they too will be gone eventually especially when things go encrypted. On that note you know where to find me....have a great evening.
jwb1977
join:2013-09-07
Orlando, FL

jwb1977 to InternetJeff

Member

to InternetJeff
said by InternetJeff:

No argument there. But ... do you deny that people were told that no channels would be viewable without a DA after a certain date?

Agree, I thought we were losing all channels too. However, that's apparently not the case since local channels will be available on QAM.

Here's where I asked about the local OTA channels long ago :

»Re: [CFL] Bright House Kicks Off All-Digital Transition In CFL
InternetJeff
I'm your huckleberry.
join:2001-09-25
.

InternetJeff

Member

said by jwb1977:

said by InternetJeff:

No argument there. But ... do you deny that people were told that no channels would be viewable without a DA after a certain date?

Agree, I thought we were losing all channels too. However, that's apparently not the case since local channels will be available on QAM.

Here's where I asked about the local OTA channels long ago :

»Re: [CFL] Bright House Kicks Off All-Digital Transition In CFL

Well, judging from the past post you reference, it would depend upon what the definition of a "couple" channels are.

The official notice we've received from BHN calls out sixteen (16). So, a subscriber having basic cable should be able to avoid renting more stuff from BHN if they are satisfied with the aforementioned sixteen channels.

And I would wager that if enough people did that, those channels would be eventually be encrypted also. But I could be wrong. It is only my opinion, based upon past experience
jwb1977
join:2013-09-07
Orlando, FL

jwb1977

Member

said by InternetJeff:

Well, judging from the past post you reference, it would depend upon what the definition of a "couple" channels are.

Hence my attempt to be very specific with OTA locals being available... Its an art to ask the question exactly the right way
InternetJeff
I'm your huckleberry.
join:2001-09-25
.

InternetJeff

Member

Ain't that the truth.