<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air&#x27; in forum &#x27;Verizon FiOS TV&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29574322</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:19:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:19:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29931307</link>
<description><![CDATA[ansky posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1009486" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1009486');">crgauth</a>:</said><p>A bit of a stretch in some areas. I have heard that some areas people can pick up 30+ (around La close to 100) OTA channels and their subs.<br></p></div>I live right outside NYC and can pick up at least 50 channels/subchannels with my antenna.  Aside from the main networks most of these are foreign language, religious, or shopping channels.  So it would be a huge waste of bandwidth if Verizon carried them all.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29931307</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29931222</link>
<description><![CDATA[crgauth posted : A bit of a stretch in some areas. I have heard that some areas people can pick up 30+ (around La close to 100) OTA channels and their subs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29931222</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:16:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29931142</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted : I doubt I would watch that channel.. but I would like VZ, to "in general" as policy to carry all local channels & their subchannels ....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29931142</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:49:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29930658</link>
<description><![CDATA[ansky posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1444888" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1444888');">matcarl</a>:</said><p>Do you really want Verizon to add that "hopefully soon?" I believe that is one of the .TV channels we don't have.<br></p></div>No, Justice TV is not a .TV network.  They actually have some pretty decent programming.<br><br>www.justicenetworktv.com]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29930658</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:40:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29930522</link>
<description><![CDATA[matcarl posted : Do you really want Verizon to add that "hopefully soon?" I believe that is one of the .TV channels we don't have.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29930522</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:31:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29930514</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted : Their web note says it doesn't effect Cable or Satellite viewers, only OTA viewers will have to re-scan , they are still xmitting on VHF ch 3, but the  OTA PSIP will now map to 33.1 instead of 3.10 until the rest of their "case" is decided ..<br> The also added a subchannel , "Justice TV " , which we may hopefully soon locally have added in the VZ ch 460-498 range ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29930514</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:27:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29929448</link>
<description><![CDATA[skohly posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/165034" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=165034');">Photoman15</a>:</said><p>No one's commented here since Dec (2014). This weekend there was a scroll on 503 (ME-TV) that they are being forced by the FCC to move their OTA channel to 33.1 (from 3.10) on Monday March 16th 2015. Just an FYI<br></p></div>Clearly we are not affected by this as it's still on ch 503]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29929448</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:22:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29929362</link>
<description><![CDATA[Photoman15 posted : No one's commented here since Dec (2014). This weekend there was a scroll on 503 (ME-TV) that they are being forced by the FCC to move their OTA channel to 33.1 (from 3.10) on Monday March 16th 2015. Just an FYI]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29929362</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:30:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air again, expected extended viewing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-again-expected-extended-viewing-29700820</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : So happy someone saw fit to announce something about Legal success with FCC in Wash.D.C. . Last I heard they were going off the air( a month ago) I wrote them a real nice letter saying My wife and I were senior citizens, consuming only over the air programming, and really appreciate lots of watching of real quality programming, ( not the junk of today ), I reiterate real quality tv, and would hope for lots more. So happy to see their success, and our better tv. We think it's a good thing for kids of today to see. This as reflection of "The American Dream" not "the bottom of the trash barrel of today" 20141201... GOOD NEWS FOR ALL Over-The-Air-Broadcasting for folks Who really appreciate "Free And Wholesome"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-again-expected-extended-viewing-29700820</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:38:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29695969</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted : Latest news on the WJLP website is that they apparently won something in a Federal appeals Court in DC on 11/25, & they say they will be on CH 3 for the forseeable future ....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29695969</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:53:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29673416</link>
<description><![CDATA[matcarl posted : Aww, the dog was cute though, you've got to give them that. I didn't understand the blurry blinding sun though. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29673416</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:45:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29673410</link>
<description><![CDATA[flatron posted : I would nominate Hamptons TV/WVVH for having one of the worst station IDs ever:<br><p><div style='z-index:0; text-align:center;display:block;' class='youtube_div'><iframe width='560' height='315' src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OzB6VIsxEFk?autoplay=0&origin=www.dslreports.com" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></p><center>&raquo;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzB6VIsxEFk" >www.youtube.com/watch?v= &middot;&middot;&middot; 6VIsxEFk</a></center><br><small>--<br>List of Verizon FiOS channels: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.tvchannellists.com/List_of_Verizon_FiOS_Channels" >www.tvchannellists.com/L &middot;&middot;&middot; Channels</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29673410</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:43:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29673308</link>
<description><![CDATA[matcarl posted : Probably the only people who watch that horrible channel are the people who live in the Hamptons. Not many channels are available there OTA if you don't have cable. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29673308</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:51:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29673297</link>
<description><![CDATA[charliewatts posted : On another note here in VHO5 ... What's with that lousy Hamptons Indie on Channel 14?  I'm guessing a Must Carry on a nice channel location.  Can't that be moved to a less desirable spot?  Are they ever going to go HD.  Better yet, does anybody watch?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29673297</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:44:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665989</link>
<description><![CDATA[charliewatts posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1862584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1862584');">charliewatts</a>:</said><p>We got Verizon to map the 3/503 correctly.  Now I have removed 3/503 from my favorites.  I don't think it's coming back too soon.  Not at 3/503 for sure.  Maybe never.<br></p></div>To quote Willy Wonka .. "Strike That!  Reverse It'.<br><br>It's been reported that this is TEMPORARY until 12/1.  After that, who knows?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665989</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:22:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665914</link>
<description><![CDATA[skohly posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1644788" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1644788');">ansky</a>:</said><p>WJLP is back on the air, still on channel 3-10.  According to their Facebook page they have been restored until December 1.  There is no information about what happens after that.  They have not been restored back on Fios yet.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="https://www.facebook.com/metv3" >www.facebook.com/metv3</A><br></p></div>BACK ON FIOS! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665914</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:43:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665907</link>
<description><![CDATA[nlk10010 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1653258" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653258');">thetick</a>:</said><p>In addition turn to CH 19 and get ME tv there. Not HD but we have it. This is much to do about zilch.<br></p></div>(Stipulating to the fact that it's being reported that the channel is now back on 3). I agree totally; however, there appear to be people on these boards who are concerned not with content but with seeing those two letters appended to the channel name. So, for them, this is (was) a sad day.<br><br>BTW, GREAT channel. I haven't seen those shows in years.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665907</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:39:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665589</link>
<description><![CDATA[bohratom posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1862584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1862584');">charliewatts</a>:</said><p>Not at 3/503 for sure.  Maybe never.</p></div>Charlie, you might want to read the reply below yours... :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665589</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:42:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665569</link>
<description><![CDATA[nascar posted : back in business... for now...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665569</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:18:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665281</link>
<description><![CDATA[ansky posted : WJLP is back on the air, still on channel 3-10.  According to their Facebook page they have been restored until December 1.  There is no information about what happens after that.  They have not been restored back on Fios yet.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="https://www.facebook.com/metv3" >www.facebook.com/metv3</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29665281</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:55:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29664684</link>
<description><![CDATA[charliewatts posted : We got Verizon to map the 3/503 correctly.  Now I have removed 3/503 from my favorites.  I don't think it's coming back too soon.  Not at 3/503 for sure.  Maybe never.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29664684</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:59:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29664676</link>
<description><![CDATA[bsangs posted : I think eight of the 10 people that even knew this channel existed are on this thread. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29664676</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:56:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29664638</link>
<description><![CDATA[dfwguy posted : WJLP are crying like spoiled children because they aren't getting special treatment after using an out of date law to get on the air in the first place. The FCC should revoke their license for going dark when there is no technical reason for it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29664638</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:41:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29664090</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1552888" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1552888');">Greg2600</a>:</said><p>This was posted by a highly knowledgeable member at AVSForum (Trip in VA), and pretty much nails it.  As long as the FCC feels there is a signal overlap, then two stations cannot share the same channel number. <b> FCC ruled that WJLP does overlap coverage with WFSB in CT and KYW in PA, and therefore cannot use channel 3 since they already do. </b> <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://atsc.org/cms/standards/a65/A65_2013.pdf" >atsc.org/cms/standards/a &middot;&middot;&middot; 2013.pdf</A><br><br><blockquote>"The following provisions assign major_channel_number values 2 through 69 uniquely to licensees<br>licensed to broadcast digital ATSC signals and guarantee that the two-part channel number<br>combinations used by a licensee will be different from those used by any other licensee with an<br>overlapping DTV Service Area."<br></p></div>  The FCC did not yet rule on this matter, & has not yet taken up or released any ruling on the complaint filed against WJLP by the other parties, & has not issued any ruling that they can no longer "ever" use PSIP 3.10. <br> They simply required JLP to temporarily move to PSIP 33.1 "until the matter is ruled on ", but WJLP refused the request & chose to go off OTA  until there is "actually " a ruling from the FCC.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29664090</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:28:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29663733</link>
<description><![CDATA[Greg2600 posted : This was posted by a highly knowledgeable member at AVSForum (Trip in VA), and pretty much nails it.  As long as the FCC feels there is a signal overlap, then two stations cannot share the same channel number.  FCC ruled that WJLP does overlap coverage with WFSB in CT and KYW in PA, and therefore cannot use channel 3 since they already do.  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://atsc.org/cms/standards/a65/A65_2013.pdf" >atsc.org/cms/standards/a &middot;&middot;&middot; 2013.pdf</A><br><br><blockquote>"The following provisions assign major_channel_number values 2 through 69 uniquely to licensees<br>licensed to broadcast digital ATSC signals and guarantee that the two-part channel number<br>combinations used by a licensee will be different from those used by any other licensee with an<br>overlapping DTV Service Area."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29663733</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:19:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29663502</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1644788" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1644788');">ansky</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1552888" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1552888');">Greg2600</a>:</said><p>This is in addition to the fact that as a low frequency VHF channel, reception in the area would be problematic.  Part of what the FCC is doing is I think trying to set a precedent that we can't have stations popping up on lousy frequencies that may interfere with other devices/transmissions.  <br></p></div>They are not interfering with anything by broadcasting on channel 3.  That is a perfectly legal channel allocation for commercial television.  This whole fiasco is related to virtual channel numbers, not RF channel numbers.<br></p></div> Correct, no entity or other distant VHF 3 is claiming OTA interference by this Licensed Ch 3, or trying to shut down or lower it's transmit power or elevation ......<br>  WJLP Probably feels since there is no interference,  it is up to those who filed a complaint to first "win" their case, before JLP has to actually be forced move from PSIP "3.10" to a UHF PSIP channel number & are now waiting to see if they can return OTA as 3.10 in the interim...  <br>Even if they lose, that's not an unreasonable position ...<br>  Of course, just as Cablevision puts Ion on ch 3, This should have no effect on Fios Keeping JLP on Ch 3 ..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29663502</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:46:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662813</link>
<description><![CDATA[ansky posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1552888" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1552888');">Greg2600</a>:</said><p>This is in addition to the fact that as a low frequency VHF channel, reception in the area would be problematic.  Part of what the FCC is doing is I think trying to set a precedent that we can't have stations popping up on lousy frequencies that may interfere with other devices/transmissions.  <br></p></div>They are not interfering with anything by broadcasting on channel 3.  That is a perfectly legal channel allocation for commercial television.  This whole fiasco is related to virtual channel numbers, not RF channel numbers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662813</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:35:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662786</link>
<description><![CDATA[thetick posted : I work in New Jersey so I spend almost as much time in NJ as I do in NY.  Thanks for confirming WJLP had zero NJ programming.  Talk is cheap.  The guys at WJLP have only themselves to blame by choosing not to follow a clearly defined FCC mandate.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662786</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:19:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662324</link>
<description><![CDATA[nascar posted : Yes. 100% serious. And I live in NJ not White Plains, NY. So I care about what happens in my state, the one I reside in.<br><br>And yes, if you read what I wrote...  they planned to offer original NJ programing. <br><br>""We are looking forward to providing news breaks several times a day, Monday through Friday and working closely with them on their public service programming," said Thomas Donovan, president and publisher of the Asbury Park Press. "This is a great opportunity to further serve our readers, on yet another platform, across the state of New Jersey, and we are excited about our partnership with WJLP."<br><br>The station will also partner with Monmouth University in West Long Branch, where it will produce two original shows. "Jersey Matters" will air at 7 a.m. Saturday and 9 a.m. Sunday, and it will focus on New Jersey news. Its production will begin Nov. 22 and it will go live Nov. 29.<br><br>"And Another Thing With Larry Mendte" will air at 7:30 a.m. Saturday and 9:30 a.m. Sunday, and its broader scope will focus on news outside of New Jersey. It went live from Delaware in June. Larry Mendte has won more than 90 Emmy awards as a newscaster in the New York and Philadelphia markets.""<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.app.com/story/money/business/main-street/2014/11/06/wjlp-freehold-tv-station/18605551/" >www.app.com/story/money/ &middot;&middot;&middot; 8605551/</A><br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1653258" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653258');">thetick</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/140267" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=140267');">nascar</a>:</said><p>This sux. They were going to air original NJ specific programing. I guess the FCC would rather keep the best interest of anyone except the residents of New Jersey.  They (FCC) work for us, the people right? Or am I wrong? And I know the answer to they work for us.  :uhh:<br><br>Where do we petition the FCC?<br></p></div>Are you serious?  Did you actually read the FCC documents.  Apparently not as WJLP blatantly ignored the Oct 23rd FCC mandate to use channel 33.X and not 3.10.  The FCC gets to interpret the rules not individual stations.<br><br>BTW there was zero NJ specific programming on WJPL.<br></p></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662324</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:16:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662315</link>
<description><![CDATA[skohly posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1653258" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653258');">thetick</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/140267" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=140267');">nascar</a>:</said><p>This sux. They were going to air original NJ specific programing. I guess the FCC would rather keep the best interest of anyone except the residents of New Jersey.  They (FCC) work for us, the people right? Or am I wrong? And I know the answer to they work for us.  :uhh:<br><br>Where do we petition the FCC?<br></p></div>Are you serious?  Did you actually read the FCC documents.  Apparently not as WJLP blatantly ignored the Oct 23rd FCC mandate to use channel 33.X and not 3.10.  The FCC gets to interpret the rules not individual stations.<br><br>BTW there was zero NJ specific programming on WJPL.<br></p></div>In addition turn to CH 19 and get ME tv there. Not HD but we have it. This is much to do about zilch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662315</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:10:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662305</link>
<description><![CDATA[Greg2600 posted : They were going to air one show on weekends, called Jersey Matters.  There was another show already running on their Delaware/Philly channel, which wasn't NJ specific.  Again, there's no history for this channel to #3, they wanted it because it would have a large channel surfing rate because it was in between CBS 2 and NBC 4.  Evidently the channel's ad rates aren't going to fetch nearly as much on ch. 33.  Again, that's too bad.  This is in addition to the fact that as a low frequency VHF channel, reception in the area would be problematic.  Part of what the FCC is doing is I think trying to set a precedent that we can't have stations popping up on lousy frequencies that may interfere with other devices/transmissions.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662305</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:07:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662258</link>
<description><![CDATA[thetick posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/140267" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=140267');">nascar</a>:</said><p>This sux. They were going to air original NJ specific programing. I guess the FCC would rather keep the best interest of anyone except the residents of New Jersey.  They (FCC) work for us, the people right? Or am I wrong? And I know the answer to they work for us.  :uhh:<br><br>Where do we petition the FCC?<br></p></div>Are you serious?  Did you actually read the FCC documents.  Apparently not as WJLP blatantly ignored the Oct 23rd FCC mandate to use channel 33.X and not 3.10.  The FCC gets to interpret the rules not individual stations.<br><br>BTW there was zero NJ specific programming on WJPL.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29662258</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:49:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661882</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted : Remember, the FCC has not yet ruled one way or the other,  on the petiton from the other parties to get JLP "off"  OTA PSIP ch 3.10, they just required JLP to use a ch 33 identifier "temporarily" until a decision is made  ....<br> JLP refused to even temporarily move to a 33.1 identifier, forcing the shutdown, & they have now petitioned the FCC to allow the 3.10 to remain on OTA until the case is actually is decided ...<br>  We will see what eventually happens .....<br>  WJLP does have a couple of valid points in their rebuttal, & may get a decision in their favor ...<br> 1) - The congressional 1980's rule/law that requires the FCC to grant Delaware & NJ an immediate Licence for an OTA "VHF" channel,  would seem to be moot, if an out of state entity can then force the VHF NJ station off their licensed VHF ch's PSIP, & onto a UHF identifier ....<br> 2) - WJLP already gave up voluntarily any must-carry requirements for their station in CT.<br>  In reality, any "true" FCC recognized overlap area would be mostly way in the Philly or Hartford primary area anyway, & only those who have relatively large and/or rotateable VHF capable outdoor directional antennas would get a signal from JLP 3.10, & when rotated away from the other ch 3.1, & these relatively few OTA TV "techie's" aren't stupid, & would not be confused as to what they are receiving ....<br>   Im not sure if WJLP has conceded to allow Ion to continue on Cablevision's ch 3, but if they simply Allow Cablevision to not move Ion, that may be "enough" ....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661882</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:26:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661778</link>
<description><![CDATA[nascar posted : This sux. They were going to air original NJ specific programing. I guess the FCC would rather keep the best interest of anyone except the residents of New Jersey.  They (FCC) work for us, the people right? Or am I wrong? And I know the answer to they work for us.  :uhh:<br><br>Where do we petition the FCC?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661778</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:42:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661695</link>
<description><![CDATA[thetick posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1644788" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1644788');">ansky</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1862584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1862584');">charliewatts</a>:</said><p>Any guesses as to how long this will go on for?<br></p></div>My guess is this will be a long battle.  If they wanted to go down easy they would have just moved to virtual 33-1. But instead they found it better to remove the station off the air completely.  That means they're in it for the long haul.  I just find it ironic that they took advantage of FCC loopholes to move this station across the country and now they are fighting with the FCC for not taking their side.<br></p></div>Gee I wish I had a list of advertisers ?  I'm sure they would like their money back now that the channel is down.  I bet almost all of them have no idea their paid advertising is not being shown.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661695</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:09:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661674</link>
<description><![CDATA[ansky posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1862584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1862584');">charliewatts</a>:</said><p>Any guesses as to how long this will go on for?<br></p></div>My guess is this will be a long battle.  If they wanted to go down easy they would have just moved to virtual 33-1. But instead they found it better to remove the station off the air completely.  That means they're in it for the long haul.  I just find it ironic that they took advantage of FCC loopholes to move this station across the country and now they are fighting with the FCC for not taking their side.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661674</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:56:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661570</link>
<description><![CDATA[charliewatts posted : Any guesses as to how long this will go on for?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661570</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:07:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661563</link>
<description><![CDATA[thetick posted : For anyone who cares the announcement prior to the channel being turned off:<br><br><p><div style='z-index:0; text-align:center;display:block;' class='youtube_div'><iframe width='560' height='315' src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Yj0NhZdyqDQ?autoplay=0&origin=www.dslreports.com" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></p><center>&raquo;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj0NhZdyqDQ&feature=youtu.be" >www.youtube.com/watch?v= &middot;&middot;&middot; youtu.be</a></center>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661563</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:04:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661470</link>
<description><![CDATA[Greg2600 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1667850" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1667850');">skohly</a>:</said><p>The entire story is confusing to me. Is this about CH 3 in Hartford making the noise? Hartford has nothing to do with New York City or all of New Jersey. Are the big boys really afraid of old television reruns going up against them?  <br></p></div>No, not just them.  WFSB Hartford, a CBS affiliate, which broadcasts in reverse of WJLP, did file objection.  They broadcast over UHF 33 but virtual ch 3 as they have been for decades.  Another CBS station, KYW in Philly, also comes on virtual ch 3, UHF 26.  Both stations claimed overlap with WJLP, which there probably isn't much of, on virtual 3.  WJLP tried to use 3.10, but the FCC never granted that.  ION/WPXN NYC also filed a complaint, because they use channel 3 on Cablevision systems.  The reason for their complaint is that the FCC tries to avoid OTA stations winding up fighting for the same channel on cable systems.  <br><br>I would agree with WJLP that they're up against some big time CBS lawyers, but that's not the point.  Their interpretation of the FCC rules in trying to air on 3-10 have been shot down.  Move to 33 and be done with it.  Sorry if that's not what they expected but they are a Johnny come lately who side stepped FCC rules to move the station across country.  FCC does NOT look highly on that.<br><br>FWIW, the channel is not airing on FIOS currently because WJLP shut down the signal.  Had they moved it to virtual 33-1, FIOS would still be airing the feed.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661470</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:27:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661371</link>
<description><![CDATA[thetick posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1667850" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1667850');">skohly</a>:</said><p>The entire story is confusing to me.<br></p></div>It's not confusing at all.  Stupid people make stupid decisions.  It's all very clear in the FCC documents what was asked by the FCC and pmcmtv just ignored the request.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661371</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:44:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661242</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1667850" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1667850');">skohly</a>:</said><p>The entire story is confusing to me. Is this about CH 3 in Hartford making the noise? Hartford has nothing to do with New York City or all of New Jersey. Are the big boys really afraid of old television reruns going up against them?  <br></p></div> There's a small part of CT that fringe overlaps the CT & NYC channels.. & CH 3 Hartford doesn't want "two" ch 3's in their area, even if one is 3.10 vs 3.1 ...<br> ** Keep in mind that the requirement for JLP to move to Ch 33 is "temporary", until the FCC decides the case/complaint for a swich of PSIP channel, & JLP is (in the letter linked earlier), petitioning the FCC to set aside the ch 33 temporary requirement until the case is resolved ...<br>  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661242</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:48:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661211</link>
<description><![CDATA[skohly posted : The entire story is confusing to me. Is this about CH 3 in Hartford making the noise? Hartford has nothing to do with New York City or all of New Jersey. Are the big boys really afraid of old television reruns going up against them?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661211</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:33:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661180</link>
<description><![CDATA[ansky posted : I don't understand why they wouldn't just move to channel 33.  How is it the better alternative to go off the air completely? They could have just removed the "channel 3" from their logo.  Nobody cares about channel numbers anymore.  It sounds like they just want to battle this out as the "little guy".  I'm sure there is more to this story than we know about.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29661180</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:12:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660928</link>
<description><![CDATA[thetick posted : Wow these pmcmtv guys are a bunch of morons.  <br><br>I see FIOS channel 3/503 now shows "Programming on this channel is no longer available.  Your FIOS TV service is working." <br><br>I read the FCC letters posted at pmcmtv.com.  I'm no lawyer, but the FCC made it very clear on Oct 23 what needs to be done and pmcmtv DID NOT FOLLOW the simple request.  Just because pmcmtv interprets the law differently does not entitle pmcmtv to violate FCC requests and complain the big bad CBS and ION Networks shut you down.  That's just a plain lie.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660928</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:31:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660508</link>
<description><![CDATA[Greg2600 posted : They just have to switch to virtual channel 33, that's the requirement.  They won't be allowed to stay on 3.10.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660508</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:38:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660501</link>
<description><![CDATA[ansky posted : I just watched the announcement.  He specifically stated "over the air viewers".  I wonder if they will stay on Fios.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660501</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:34:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660438</link>
<description><![CDATA[matcarl posted : Whoever is interested in reading this mumbo jumbo letter (not me) that they wrote to the FCC, here it is. Who knows what will happen. <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://pmcmtv.com/Emergency-Motion-for-Stay-AS-FILED.PDF" >pmcmtv.com/Emergency-Mot &middot;&middot;&middot; ILED.PDF</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660438</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:04:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660361</link>
<description><![CDATA[rpjoe posted : Welp. That was fun. I was watching CHiPs and the station made an announcement that they will cease broadcasting ota at midnight because of complaints by channel 3 in Hartford.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29660361</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:30:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29655762</link>
<description><![CDATA[shark2k posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1847574" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1847574');">lee7n</a>:</said><p>I don't believe you can force it but seriously not to be rude or anything but what is the big deal about a missing icon?  They go missing on channels all the time.  Eventually they will fix it.  There are many icons missing right now.  Can still DVR and watch the channels.<br></p></div>I use WMC for my TV and us My Channel Logo's to add logos to the guide.  It can auto populate the channels it has logos for and then if you want you can add your own logo for channels that don't have a logo in the database or customize a logo if you prefer.  One day I went through and used a couple sites to find the logos and add probably 20-25 logos that were missing in my guide.  While they may not be a big deal, they make the guide look much nicer having a logo vs just text stating the station name.  Me TV was one of the channels I actually added a logo for.<br><br>-Shark2k]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29655762</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:47:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: New Me-TV affiliate in NYC is on the air</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29652048</link>
<description><![CDATA[charliewatts posted : That must be it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-MeTV-affiliate-in-NYC-is-on-the-air-29652048</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:47:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
