dslreports logo
uniqs
9
elefante72
join:2010-12-03
East Amherst, NY

elefante72 to techguru306

Member

to techguru306

Re: Merger has better chance of approval since broadband is under title II

The overlap theory was never really an issue because cable overbuilding is quite limited--the divestitures was there not to trigger the % that has caused monopolies to be an issue in the past. That is the only reason for spinco, etc...

It its unknown yet what authority the FCC has under Title II, unless you could point us to that? I would be interested to know what they are actually trying to do.

Charter is the shell company for Liberty Media. This is essentially Malone trying to put his empire back together again.

It's not like Charter acquiring TWC is going to make everything all right. Outside of their scale, they are probably worse than Comcast at CS. Once the two combined expect CS to be just as bad or worse than Comcast.

Put plainly there are no positive outcomes here without solid 2/3 competitors in place.
techguru306
join:2015-02-11
Cincinnati, OH
ZyXEL VMG4381

techguru306

Member

said by elefante72:

The overlap theory was never really an issue because cable overbuilding is quite limited--the divestitures was there not to trigger the % that has caused monopolies to be an issue in the past. That is the only reason for spinco, etc...

It its unknown yet what authority the FCC has under Title II, unless you could point us to that? I would be interested to know what they are actually trying to do.

Charter is the shell company for Liberty Media. This is essentially Malone trying to put his empire back together again.

It's not like Charter acquiring TWC is going to make everything all right. Outside of their scale, they are probably worse than Comcast at CS. Once the two combined expect CS to be just as bad or worse than Comcast.

Put plainly there are no positive outcomes here without solid 2/3 competitors in place.

They have the authority to reclassify broadband under title II but the FCC did not want to do that at first. But after Verizon Wireless wining their appeal they left the FCC with no choice but to reclassify broadband under title II. The FCC has already taken the vote now the only thing we are waiting for is for them to publish the change in the federal register. After it is published in the Federal Register it will become effective after 60 days. If they do sue which I am sure they will they will lose their lawsuit due to the fact they have the authority to reclassify them and they have the authority to enforce and create rules under title II. They did not have the authority to do that under Title I and that is why Verizon won the appeal.
96964493 (banned)
join:2015-01-09
USA

96964493 (banned)

Member

Actually the FCC isn't given access to regulate. It was never a telecommunication service that's the thing. It was and is information. plus this has nothing to do with peering and such. Only last mile. Look for the private networks to come back and bite the FCC along with the court behind the gardens.

ISPs are already suing to get the rules as they were never open to comment before voting. All acts, rules, and laws need to be published first before voting.
techguru306
join:2015-02-11
Cincinnati, OH

techguru306

Member

The have the authority to reclassify even the court that threw out the last net neutrality rules said the FCC has the power to reclassify them.

mikedz4
join:2003-04-14
Weirton, WV

mikedz4 to elefante72

Member

to elefante72
why did Malone get out of the cable business to begin with? Was he forced out at at&t broadband or did he willingly give up control?