Two things, a) I'm wondering if John Chambers sees something here that I don't in OpenDNS' offering, and b) what's
Cisco's longterm view on this, if any?
Looks like this is brought up by the posters in the Security forum -- and rightly so they point out how this could turn into another "Linksys by Cisco" brand.
Rereading the original OpenDNS blog post
quote:
We believe we can move faster and with more impact by leveraging Ciscos scale and resources in a way that we would be unable to do on our own or with any other partner.
Emp. mine.
Yes, Cisco is big, but WHERE would OpenDNS fit into the grand "One Cisco" vision?
Linksys isn't around anymore, so no default "DNS by OpenDNS" possibility there.
Cisco Small Business? Not sure about that one.
Cisco Meraki? Possibly as default DNS servers? Roll in a "DNS subscription" into the licence fees as another source
of annual
tributerevenue?
Overall as part of Cisco's Web Security offerings? They've got IDS / IDS with Sourcefire, web reputation with Scansafe
and Ironport, email security with Ironport, the only thing lacking in the UTM matrix is AV and DNS, so in that sense the
OpenDNS acquisition makes sense.
Agree with you Wily_One
that $625meg is chump change for Cisco, though OpenDNS is more a "it works well enough" for me.
My 00000010bits
Regards