said by Blackbird:From the article:
...CISA would grant companies broad immunity from privacy laws when they share cybersecurity-related information with the Department of Homeland Security.
IMO, the phrase
"privacy laws" is in reality a euphemism for "
due process violations".
Substituting "
due process violations" for
privacy laws" wherever it occurs gives a glimpse into how this will be abused if it becomes law.
This is how I see it;
...CISA would grant companies broad immunity from due process violations when they share cybersecurity-related information with the Department of Homeland Security.
It's about an end run around due process.
Also of note is the use of the word
"companies"By definition a "company" can be legally recognized as such by the gov't even if the "company" consists of a single individual.
So swapping out "
companies" with "everyone" gives a clearer view of where this is going to end up....CISA would grant everyone broad immunity from privacy laws when they share cybersecurity-related information with the Department of Homeland Security.
...CISA would grant everyone broad immunity from due process violations when they share cybersecurity-related information with the Department of Homeland Security.
