dslreports logo
uniqs
2

nanook
MVM
join:2007-12-02

nanook to fefrie

MVM

to fefrie

Re: Why are uploads "free"?

IOW uploads aren't "free" after all. That cost is being "subsidized" by all the people who stream videos on Netflix et al

jmck
formerly 'shaded'
join:2010-10-02
Ottawa, ON

jmck

Member

said by nanook:

IOW uploads aren't "free" after all. That cost is being "subsidized" by all the people who stream videos on Netflix et al

there's no subsidization going on with uploads, it really comes at no cost to TSI because of how the billing from it's providers works out.

nobody ends up paying for a customer that ends up using their upload 24/7 at max speed.

nanook
MVM
join:2007-12-02

nanook

MVM

said by jmck:

there's no subsidization going on with uploads, it really comes at no cost to TSI because of how the billing from it's providers works out.

I used the terms "free" and "subsidizing" in quotes for a reason.

nobody ends up paying for a customer that ends up using their upload 24/7 at max speed.

Only because of the asymmetric imbalance between media streaming and other high volume download usage vs. file sharers, cloud sharers and other uploaders. The former create the situation and pay for the extra costs of provisioning it that allows the latter to do their "free" uploads. In that sense they subsidize them.