dslreports logo
Search similar:


uniqs
444

NICK ADSL UK
MVM
join:2004-02-22
united kingd
kudos:17

NICK ADSL UK

MVM

Java Runtime Environment 32-Bit 8 Update

Free Java Download
Download Java for your desktop computer now!
Version 8 Update 77
Release Date March 23, 2016
»java.com/en/download/

LadyL
Premium Member
join:2002-09-18
Lorain, OH

LadyL

Premium Member

Thank you.
Fickey
Terrorists target your backbone
join:2004-05-31

Fickey to NICK ADSL UK

Member

to NICK ADSL UK
Security Alert is now posted:

Due to the severity of this vulnerability and the public disclosure of technical details, Oracle strongly recommends that customers apply the updates provided by this Security Alert as soon as possible.

»www.oracle.com/technetwo ··· 497.html
I'm not smart enough to know just how genuinely severe it is, so guess I'll be updating. Thanks Nick!
Mele20
Premium Member
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI
kudos:8

Mele20 to NICK ADSL UK

Premium Member

to NICK ADSL UK
Ouch! That's nasty! 9.7 vulnerability on a 10 point scale.

After reading the security alert, I now understand why the Java installer INSISTED on uninstalling the vulnerable version after installing update 77. I have never seen that before. Usually, you have to initiate uninstalls of older versions and interestingly the installer did not care that it also found another older version as it left it intact.

I couldn't read some of the information the installer was trying to show me as somehow it decided to use a HUGE font and the window could not be dragged or clicked larger so text was running off the right edge and the bottom sentences were completely off the screen and not visible. I don't recall a huge font in the past...strange.

Anyhow, thanks. I'm glad I got that quickly due to your post Nick.

lordpuffer
RIP lil
Premium Member
join:2004-09-19
Albuquerque, NM
kudos:2

lordpuffer to NICK ADSL UK

Premium Member

to NICK ADSL UK
Thanks Nick!
redwolfe_98
Premium Member
join:2001-06-11
kudos:3

redwolfe_98 to NICK ADSL UK

Premium Member

to NICK ADSL UK
here is a related article:

»news.softpedia.com/news/ ··· 23.shtml
jupitermoon
join:2011-09-27

jupitermoon to Mele20

Member

to Mele20
said by Mele20 :

Ouch! That's nasty! 9.7 vulnerability on a 10 point scale.

I updated Java last night and everything proceeded normally. When the installer finished and I went to open the control panel to check the configuration, there was no control panel. Most of the links under the Java shortcut in the Start menu were missing. There was no Configure Java, no Check for updates, etc. Programs and Features still showed Java installed, and Program Files and %appdata% found a scattering of mostly empty folders. I uninstalled Java.

This is the first time this happened and I have an idea why. I had installed Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit Free earlier that evening, which has shields for Java protection. I know that you use this program. Do you have to disable the shields in order to update Java?

DarkLogix
Texan and Proud
Premium Member
join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX
kudos:4

1 edit

DarkLogix to Mele20

Premium Member

to Mele20
said by Mele20:

After reading the security alert, I now understand why the Java installer INSISTED on uninstalling the vulnerable version after installing update 77.

Also a federal lawsuit against Oracle for failure to always uninstall prior versions.

»www.ftc.gov/news-events/ ··· out-java

This link seems related, though I think the one I'm thinking of the FTC ordered Oracle to remove the old versions as the default behavior.

»arstechnica.com/informat ··· atching/
Mele20
Premium Member
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI
kudos:8

Mele20 to jupitermoon

Premium Member

to jupitermoon
said by jupitermoon:

Do you have to disable the shields in order to update Java?

Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit Free was running and fully enabled when I updated Java. I've had Ant-Exploit for awhile now and updated Java before this time with it running. It's never caused a problem...but I run Windows 8 not 7 or earlier.

That's very strange what happened to you.
lawsoncl
join:2008-10-28
Spirit Lake, ID
kudos:1

lawsoncl to DarkLogix

Member

to DarkLogix
said by DarkLogix:

Also a federal lawsuit against Oracle for failure to always uninstall prior versions.

The new 77 version still doesn't always old version. This behavior also seems to depend on how the old version was installed, as there are at least two variations of the GUID string for each version, plus 32 or 64-bit versions. I stop trusting the installer, and just have my scripts to search for and uninstall the old versions before doing a silent install of the new version.

DarkLogix
Texan and Proud
Premium Member
join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX
kudos:4

DarkLogix

Premium Member

said by lawsoncl:

said by DarkLogix:

Also a federal lawsuit against Oracle for failure to always uninstall prior versions.

The new 77 version still doesn't always old version. This behavior also seems to depend on how the old version was installed, as there are at least two variations of the GUID string for each version, plus 32 or 64-bit versions. I stop trusting the installer, and just have my scripts to search for and uninstall the old versions before doing a silent install of the new version.

Well if they don't fix it at some point they'll get fined by the FTC likely more harshly then before.