<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: A sign of things to come....&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770684</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:02:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:02:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771987</link>
<description><![CDATA[tc1uscg posted : In my list of reasons for  booting NF back in the fall, that was the nr 3 and 4th reason to set them adrift. :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771987</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:43:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771956</link>
<description><![CDATA[shmerl posted : Sure. Netflix is nowhere a hero of the people. They push DRM and ban VPNs as you said.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771956</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:29:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771917</link>
<description><![CDATA[Selenia posted : It is but I am actually more concerned with companies blocking VPNs at the behest of the studios. Netflix, Hulu, etc are all guilty. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771917</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:15:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771509</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : No body wants google blocking them. Who the hell believes that non sense.<br><br>We want open development policies for consumers. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771509</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:53:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771346</link>
<description><![CDATA[shmerl posted : That's not an excuse to be a jerk for any ISP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771346</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:11:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771310</link>
<description><![CDATA[battleop posted : This is why NN was broken to begin with.    Same goes with privacy issues.  Why should ISPs be the only ones to follow the rules?   EVERYONE should follow them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771310</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 22:55:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771308</link>
<description><![CDATA[battleop posted : This shows how little people know about NN....   What's funnier is that people get real bent out of shape if this was AT&T blocking Netflix but they have no problem with Google blocking Amazon..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771308</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 22:55:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771008</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1777748" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1777748');">cralt</a>:</said><p>Google can pick and choose who uses their servers how ever they want.Its their resource.  They could decide tomorrow that only people running CromeOS or android phones are allowed to use YT. They pay the bills they make the rules.  Youtube is not an ISP. This wouldn't be a NN issue no matter how you slice it.<br><br>GoogleFiber (the ISP) blocking Fires or access to a service? Sure thats a NN issue. But that is not what is going on here.<br></p></div>Google runs an ISP.  Net neutrality is meant to be a poison pill.  You don't get to create subsidiaries and then offload your discrimination while claiming the parent company is innocent.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31771008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:54:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770946</link>
<description><![CDATA[cralt posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1879332" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1879332');">shmerl</a>:</said><p>It should be, since why NN should be limited to ISP and not the service itself?<br></p></div>Its no more a NN issue then getting banned from Facebook or DSLreports.com. They pay the bills. Its their server, their rules. They get to pick and choose who stays and goes. <br><br>Nothing is blocking Amazon from starting a competing "youtube" if they don't like it. Your ability to do just that is what the idea behind NN is. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770946</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:10:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770721</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : And you thought carriage disputes between cable and content providers were bad....<br><br>Cable 2.0.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770721</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:09:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770929</link>
<description><![CDATA[shmerl posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1777748" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1777748');">cralt</a>:</said><p>This wouldn't be a NN issue no matter how you slice it.<br></p></div>It should be, since why NN should be limited to ISP and not the service itself? It's an anti-competitive move.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770929</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:57:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770926</link>
<description><![CDATA[cralt posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1879332" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1879332');">shmerl</a>:</said><p>It would be, if Youtube servers would discriminate incoming requests (based let's say on user agent).<br></p></div>Google can pick and choose who uses their servers how ever they want.Its their resource.  They could decide tomorrow that only people running CromeOS or android phones are allowed to use YT. They pay the bills they make the rules.  Youtube is not an ISP. This wouldn't be a NN issue no matter how you slice it. <br><br>GoogleFiber (the ISP) blocking Fires or access to a service? Sure thats a NN issue. But that is not what is going on here. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770926</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:55:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770818</link>
<description><![CDATA[atuarre posted : Because Apple has all these requirements and restrictions for you to carry said iPhones. I wouldn't want to deal with that nonsense either.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770818</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:01:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770813</link>
<description><![CDATA[shmerl posted : It would be, if Youtube servers would discriminate incoming requests (based let's say on user agent). But Google blocking their application is more of an anti-trust issue, than Net Neutrality one.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770813</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:59:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770790</link>
<description><![CDATA[maartena posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/463293" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=463293');">P Ness</a>:</said><p>Now that you don't have worry about anything silly like NN.....or oversight.....<br></p></div>This has absolutely nothing to do with Net Neutrality.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770790</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:46:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770754</link>
<description><![CDATA[silbaco posted : Wheeler's 1-way Net Neutrality never applied to Google or Amazon. Only internet service providers. Even if it had, this isn't a net neutrality issue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770754</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:28:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770708</link>
<description><![CDATA[Limeade posted : Yep, just like how Amazon purposely doesn't sell iPhones and certain branded products. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770708</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:10:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770699</link>
<description><![CDATA[elray posted : Neither Google or Amazon's moves have anything to do with Network Neutrality, just really foolish business moves by arrogant tools at the top.<br><br>They will, rather quickly, move to rescind this stupidity; wait for the kum ba yah interop peace accords announcement in short order.  Wonder if Karl will cover it?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770699</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:07:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A sign of things to come....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770684</link>
<description><![CDATA[P Ness posted : Now that you don't have worry about anything silly like NN.....or oversight.....<br><br>I am shocked they have not made it an optional 5 dollar "over ride" to allow youtube yet.<br><br>yet..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/A-sign-of-things-to-come-31770684</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 16:02:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
