<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Is 5G making you slightly sick?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830009</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:52:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:52:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830911</link>
<description><![CDATA[DavePR posted : Retinal phototoxicity and the evaluation of the blue light hazard of a new solid-state lighting technology<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-63442-5" >www.nature.com/articles/ &middot;&middot;&middot; -63442-5</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830911</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2020 09:53:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830757</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1935859" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1935859');">AppFarmer</a>:</said><p>Quite true. However, the response was to whether light makes people sick. It can. (if you prefer, you can interview migraineurs)</p></div>Their situation has nothing to do with 5G, 4G or any G. A lot of thats in their head anyway<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>mmWave falls between infrared and the frequency used to operate microwave ovens. While the spectrum is non-ionizing, its long term effects are not absolutely known. Thus, careful design and proper shielding are not out of line to request even if the risk is low.<br></p></div>Please stop. There is low chance a light bulb will give you cancer. I don't see people calling for banning lightbulbs. Idiots have been saying this since the invention of electricity then radio then TV then cell phones etc etc. If we listened to them we'd still be using candles and riding around using horses.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830757</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 22:51:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830626</link>
<description><![CDATA[AppFarmer posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by Anon7cdff :</said><p>The point is that mmwave is not anywhere close to light or even infrared where talking degrees of magnitude. A light bulb puts out more power than fricken 5G<br></p></div>Quite true. However, the response was to whether light makes people sick. It can. (if you prefer, you can interview migraineurs)<br><br>mmWave falls between infrared and the frequency used to operate microwave ovens. While the spectrum is non-ionizing, its long term effects are not absolutely known. Thus, careful design and proper shielding are not out of line to request even if the risk is low.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830626</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:11:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830523</link>
<description><![CDATA[cramer posted : Because people are irrational (and bad at math.) And the FCC (government) will attempt to regulate everything.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830523</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:20:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830514</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1395925" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1395925');">Selenia</a>:</said><p>Well you figure, ultraviolet light is on the shorter side from visible light. The waves get even more damaging as you get shorter than that into gamma rays and cosmic rays. To the longer side, you have infrared light. Some devices produce that in high volume to produce heat. It's never been determined to be harmful unless of course you burn yourself on the hot device. Radio waves, even millimeter wave, are much longer than infrared. So we're not dealing with any shorter waves than what we have already considered to be safe and benign.<br></p></div>Exactly. 70 GHz which is far above anything 5G uses is 4.3 MILLION nanometers infrared is about 800-1000 nanomters, visible light is 380 - 740 nanometers. UV is about 10-400 nanometers Xrays top out at 10 nanometers. Also the fact that 5G radiation is non-ionizing]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830514</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:03:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830496</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : The point is that mmwave is not anywhere close to light or even infrared where talking degrees of magnitude. A light bulb puts out more power than fricken 5G]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830496</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:47:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830453</link>
<description><![CDATA[Selenia posted : Well you figure, ultraviolet light is on the shorter side from visible light. The waves get even more damaging as you get shorter than that into gamma rays and cosmic rays. To the longer side, you have infrared light. Some devices produce that in high volume to produce heat. It's never been determined to be harmful unless of course you burn yourself on the hot device. Radio waves, even millimeter wave, are much longer than infrared. So we're not dealing with any shorter waves than what we have already considered to be safe and benign.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830453</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:55:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830370</link>
<description><![CDATA[DavePR posted : I have a Vietnam era magnetron hanging on a nail under my genuine Coca Cola bottle opener. It catches the caps. If there is no hazard from EM why does the FCC insist licensees be responsible for warning the public?<br><br>The cell site isn't the issue. The transmitter you put next to your head is possibly hazardous. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830370</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:05:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830358</link>
<description><![CDATA[AppFarmer posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by Anonee241 :</said><p>The answer is no. The whole 5G( more accurately mmwave as 5G goes all teh way down to 600 MHz ) is dangerous is based on the short wavelengths. yes ordinary light has a much much smaller wavelength. So how come light bulbs don't make people sick?<br></p></div>disclaimer: I have no particular opinion either way about mmWave. The following is only a rational response regarding the safety of light.<br><br>Infrared is just next to visible light in the EM spectrum and is known to affect biological organisms that cannot "see" it. Continued exposure at levels higher than those naturally occurring on Earth's surface can make the organism feel quite uncomfortable or even kill (cook) it.<br><br>Likewise, ultraviolet radiation is just slightly off from visible light and is known to damage exposed skin and DNA, increasing the chance of cancer and, eventually, death.<br><br>Neither of them is considered harmful for short term, distributed exposure. The negative effects only come from sustained and/or high power exposure.<br><br>The effects of sustained, high power (higher than naturally occurring) exposure to mmWave are simply unknown.<br><br>I know that it is relatively simple to shield from mmWave and that it is a fairly directional signal. As such, it is prudent to employ such safeguards to minimize exposure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830358</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:54:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830331</link>
<description><![CDATA[pende_tim posted : We are talking a comparison of a person working with "some up close and personal facetime" on a magnetron as compared to a person 100' away from a cell tower with much less ERP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830331</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:35:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830324</link>
<description><![CDATA[pende_tim posted : That explains why my zebrafish are acting strange. Must be the 5G bleeding into rural NW NJ from New York. /s]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830324</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:29:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830263</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : The answer is no. The whole 5G( more accurately mmwave as 5G goes all teh way down to 600 MHz ) is dangerous is based on the short wavelengths. yes ordinary light has a much much smaller wavelength. So how come light bulbs don't make people sick?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830263</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:42:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830065</link>
<description><![CDATA[DavePR posted : "The RFR Rules.   In 1996,  the [Federal Communications] Commission amended its rules to adopt new guidelines and procedures for evaluating the environmental  effects of RFR from  FCC regulated transmitters.  The Commission adopted maximum permissible exposure  (“MPE”) limits for electric and magnetic field strength and  power density for transmitters  operating at frequencies from  300 kHz to 100 GHz.   These MPE limits,  which are set  forth in Section 1.1310 of  the Rules, include limits for “occupational/controlled” exposure and limits for “general population/uncontrolled” exposure.   The occupational  exposure limits apply  in situations in  which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, provided  those persons are  fully  aware of  the potential  for exposure  and can exercise control over their exposure.  The limits of occupational exposure also  apply in situations  where an individual is transient through a location where the occupational limits  apply,  provided that he  or she is  made aware of the potential for exposure.   The more stringent general population  or  public exposure limits apply  in situations in  which the general public  may  be exposed, or in which persons exposed as a consequence of their employment  may  not  be fully  aware of the potential for exposure or cannot  exercise  control over their exposure.  Licensees can demonstrate compliance by restricting public access to areas  where RFR exceeds the public MPE limits."  <br><br>If non-ionizing radiation is harmless why does the FCC regulate it so strictly?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830065</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:53:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830037</link>
<description><![CDATA[mmmdonuts posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1556359" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1556359');">DavePR</a>:</said><p>Check out this language. Scientists never say never. <br><br>"Based on our study, we don't think 5G radiation is <i>that</i> harmful," said Subham Dasgupta, a postdoctoral fellow at Oregon State University, which published findings in early July from a study into the effects of 5G radiation on zebrafish. "It's <i>predominately</i> benign."<br></p></div>Well, I know I'm getting sick of it and all the hyperbolic emissions.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830037</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:30:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is 5G making you slightly sick?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830009</link>
<description><![CDATA[DavePR posted : Check out this language. Scientists never say never. <br><br>"Based on our study, we don't think 5G radiation is <i>that</i> harmful," said Subham Dasgupta, a postdoctoral fellow at Oregon State University, which published findings in early July from a study into the effects of 5G radiation on zebrafish. "It's <i>predominately</i> benign."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Is-5G-making-you-slightly-sick-32830009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:01:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
