dslreports logo
uniqs
6

DocDrew
RF Medic
Premium Member
join:2009-01-28
dv streaming
Ubee E31U2V1
Technicolor TC4400
ARRIS TG1672

DocDrew to Franken

Premium Member

to Franken

Re: [DOCSIS] DOCSIS 4.0 Status?

Link to the NCTA Papers for next week's expo:
»www.nctatechnicalpapers. ··· per/2020

Comcast paper on transition to DOCSIS 4:
»www.nctatechnicalpapers. ··· csis-4-0

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup

Member

said by DocDrew:

Link to the NCTA Papers for next week's expo:
»www.nctatechnicalpapers. ··· per/2020

Comcast paper on transition to DOCSIS 4:
»www.nctatechnicalpapers. ··· csis-4-0

That paper reads like it was written a year from now, and acts like most of their network (at least the parts they've done Node+0) is already mid-split, but that is not the case

I also am getting the distinct suspicion that they are trying to jump directly from what we have now to gigabit upstream, and may be skipping intermediate steps to 50, 100, or other three-digit upstream tiers

Franken
join:2016-02-26

Franken

Member

said by mixdup:

I also am getting the distinct suspicion that they are trying to jump directly from what we have now to gigabit upstream, and may be skipping intermediate steps to 50, 100, or other three-digit upstream tiers

They are doing different design in different areas. Only a subset of them will support the high-split. All the analog based nodes will only support mid-split.
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4 to mixdup

Member

to mixdup
said by mixdup:

I also am getting the distinct suspicion that they are trying to jump directly from what we have now to gigabit upstream, and may be skipping intermediate steps to 50, 100, or other three-digit upstream tiers

The paper says otherwise. It directly says "This will not be accomplished in one giant leap, but rather a transition from mid-split to high-split networks."

It will be mid-split > high-split > 4.0 over many years.

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup

Member

said by dcspidey4:

said by mixdup:

I also am getting the distinct suspicion that they are trying to jump directly from what we have now to gigabit upstream, and may be skipping intermediate steps to 50, 100, or other three-digit upstream tiers

The paper says otherwise. It directly says "This will not be accomplished in one giant leap, but rather a transition from mid-split to high-split networks."

It will be mid-split > high-split > 4.0 over many years.

It also says they're already mid-split when they aren't, unless they plan on flipping a switch before this conference actually happens
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4

Member

said by mixdup:

It also says they're already mid-split when they aren't

They are.

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup

Member

said by dcspidey4:

said by mixdup:

It also says they're already mid-split when they aren't

They are.

No they aren't. They've done a lot of the physical work to replace taps, nodes, amps, etc as part of their node+0 rollout but they have not gone mid-split with their actual services yet
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4

Member

said by mixdup:

but they have not gone mid-split with their actual services yet

They never claimed to. Most of the work is done. It's as easy as flipping a switch at this point.

I expect we'll hear more details from them at the cable expo. They could certainly enable it by the end of this year if they wanted to.
videomatic3
join:2003-12-12
Pleasanton, CA
ARRIS S33

videomatic3

Member

said by dcspidey4:

said by mixdup:

but they have not gone mid-split with their actual services yet

They never claimed to. Most of the work is done. It's as easy as flipping a switch at this point.

I expect we'll hear more details from them at the cable expo. They could certainly enable it by the end of this year if they wanted to.

Could, should, and probably won't. Theres no reason to because there's no competition

motorola870
join:2008-12-07
Arlington, TX

motorola870 to mixdup

Member

to mixdup
said by mixdup:

said by dcspidey4:

said by mixdup:

It also says they're already mid-split when they aren't

They are.

No they aren't. They've done a lot of the physical work to replace taps, nodes, amps, etc as part of their node+0 rollout but they have not gone mid-split with their actual services yet

It is still limited on where they did the node +0 nowhere near a full fledged rollout it isn't a small test area but not widely deployed yet. Areas are being upgraded but it seems to be done in phases and may not even be completed in systems fully yet.

Anon2904f
@47.13.109.x

Anon2904f to videomatic3

Anon

to videomatic3
said by videomatic3:

Could, should, and probably won't. Theres no reason to because there's no competition

Using that logic why are they offering Gig? Their top tier should be 25 Mbps then. No competition right?
sd70mac
Premium Member
join:2015-10-18
Woodstock, IL
Netgear CM1200
Linksys WRT1900ACS
Ooma Telo

sd70mac

Premium Member

said by Anon2904f :

said by videomatic3:

Could, should, and probably won't. Theres no reason to because there's no competition

Using that logic why are they offering Gig? Their top tier should be 25 Mbps then. No competition right?

Lower end is easier for someone to compete with, even for a DSL or wireless provider, and the mere possibility of competition (increased by high prices) is enough to fuel continuing upgrades, not just price adjustments.

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup to motorola870

Member

to motorola870
said by motorola870:

It is still limited on where they did the node +0 nowhere near a full fledged rollout it isn't a small test area but not widely deployed yet. Areas are being upgraded but it seems to be done in phases and may not even be completed in systems fully yet.

Node+0 is very widespread. Has it replaced every single amp? No, of course not but they still had analog systems with no upstream as of a few months ago
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4 to videomatic3

Member

to videomatic3
said by videomatic3:

Theres no reason to because there's no competition

Huh? Most of their footprint has competition. Verizon FiOS is probably their biggest, but also AT&T fiber.

Believe it or not, every metro area in the US has at least 2 high-speed wired choices for Internet.
said by mixdup:

Node+0 is very widespread

Exactly. That's what they were referring to. Every area that's gone Node+0 is also capable of mid-split. They do both at the same time.

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup

Member

said by dcspidey4:

Believe it or not, every metro area in the US has at least 2 high-speed wired choices for Internet.

Weird, my house in Atlanta has exactly one choice: Comcast

Satellite does not count
videomatic3
join:2003-12-12
Pleasanton, CA
ARRIS S33

videomatic3

Member

said by mixdup:

said by dcspidey4:

Believe it or not, every metro area in the US has at least 2 high-speed wired choices for Internet.

Weird, my house in Atlanta has exactly one choice: Comcast

Satellite does not count

I'm hoping starlink will count in the next few years, only reason to go hardline is for latency -- for local servers, starlink in the future should get the lowest latencies going across the globe

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup

Member

starlink will never be a full competitor to wireline broadband, Elon Musk has said as much himself. It's just not possible with the densities that are found in a metro area. it is meant for planes, ships, and areas where there are no other options

for people like my parents and my brother who have literally zero options, I hope that they don't try to cram the service so full of people from suburbs and urban areas that it becomes unusable
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4 to mixdup

Member

to mixdup
said by mixdup:

Weird, my house in Atlanta has exactly one choice: Comcast

Over 99% of addresses in Atlanta and the surrounding area can get both Comcast and AT&T.

AT&T has pretty widespread fiber in Atlanta too:

»broadbandnow.com/ATT
hussle87
Premium Member
join:2008-01-06
Sykesville, MD

hussle87 to mixdup

Premium Member

to mixdup
actually starlink itself will have competion with amazon and oneweb launching service with a few years

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup to dcspidey4

Member

to dcspidey4
said by dcspidey4:

said by mixdup:

Weird, my house in Atlanta has exactly one choice: Comcast

Over 99% of addresses in Atlanta and the surrounding area can get both Comcast and AT&T.

AT&T has pretty widespread fiber in Atlanta too:

»broadbandnow.com/ATT

6Mbit DSL doesn't count either, and that map is based on census blocks not actual address availability

I actually live here, and just moved, so I know exactly what I'm talking about, whereas you do not

Anon9b9a3
@98.116.224.x

Anon9b9a3

Anon

said by mixdup:

Weird, my house in Atlanta has exactly one choice: Comcast

said by mixdup:

I actually live here, and just moved, so I know exactly what I'm talking about, whereas you do not

if broadband choice is important, you should do research BEFORE moving....
your moderator at work
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4 to mixdup

Member

to mixdup

Re: [DOCSIS] DOCSIS 4.0 Status?

said by mixdup:

6Mbit DSL doesn't count either, and that map is based on census blocks not actual address availability

The map is accurate for every area I've looked at. It's down to the street level, and is very detailed.

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup

Member

said by dcspidey4:

said by mixdup:

6Mbit DSL doesn't count either, and that map is based on census blocks not actual address availability

The map is accurate for every area I've looked at. It's down to the street level, and is very detailed.

It's not for AT&T's availability across both Alabama (where my parents live, and where I used to live) and Georgia (where I, and several friends, live)
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4

Member

Weird. For Verizon FiOS, they literally show individual apartment buildings that can get fiber. Maybe the census blocks here are smaller than Atlanta's.



mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup

Member

said by dcspidey4:

Weird. For Verizon FiOS, they literally show individual apartment buildings that can get fiber. Maybe the census blocks here are smaller than Atlanta's.

Or maybe Verizon submits more detailed data than AT&T, the latter of which has been sued by states and the FCC over the quality of the broadband mapping data, and has and continues to lobby against more detailed broadband mapping data as chronicled in stories *on this very website* for years, including one just a few weeks ago
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4

Member

Yeah, I don't know where they get their data from, but it's very accurate for my area.

mixdup
join:2003-06-28
Atlanta, GA

mixdup

Member

said by dcspidey4:

Yeah, I don't know where they get their data from, but it's very accurate for my area.

ISPs are only required to provide data to the census block level. They can provide more detailed maps if they want, but they aren't required to. Thus, you can have two completely different companies like Verizon and AT&T, with differing sets of data accuracy
dcspidey4
join:2020-09-22

dcspidey4

Member

But census blocks can be as small as 30,000 sq feet, which could be what Verizon's map is showing here too.
brad152
join:2006-07-27
Chicago, IL
·Verizon Wireless

brad152

Member

said by dcspidey4:

But census blocks can be as small as 30,000 sq feet, which could be what Verizon's map is showing here too.

Verizon's FiOS rollout in baltimore was a joke when i was stuck there for work. Most places I checked when looking around could only get DSL from VZ.

AT&T, even here in Chicago claims to cover most, if not all of the city in fiber.. but what they do is cherry pick a random street in a census block, install it.. do not advertise it (seriously, I've never seen a more inept running of fiber).. then claim the entire census block has fiber.

Or my favorite was my neighborhood further south here in Chicago.. They did a street that overlapped two census blocks (one block of A, one block of B). then claimed both census blocks were done.

AT&T is a joke, and has been since SBC took over the reigns (which conveniently.. is who was originally covering ATL - Southwestern Bell so them claiming most of ATL is covered.. I'm not surprised.)