<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Verizon DSL&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4117787</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:44:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 03:44:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4699150</link>
<description><![CDATA[lowbwtom posted : Just for the record, I never said they were deliberately degrading service. I said the design was not an accident. There's a big difference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4699150</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:17:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4683143</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Its a requirement.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4683143</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:33:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4683135</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Its a requirement]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4683135</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:32:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4673250</link>
<description><![CDATA[dick white posted : It is fair to say that Verizon is making business, design, and engineering decisions about which types of equipment to deploy, and that certain types of equipment definitely have ramifications as to dial-up modem performance. However, it is not necessarily true that they are making these decisions to deliberately degrade dial-up modem performance in order to promote some other value-added product, merely, as you point out now, they might have chosen to not give the effect on dial-up service much consideration in their choices.<br><br>I hope your contacts with the regulators will be helpful - if only to reinforce with Verizon management that they should consider the customers in their engineering decisions.<br><br>Actually, voltage has everything to do with communications speed on a copper wire. The signal, whether analog or digital, is transmitted from one end of the wire to the other by varying the voltage input at the source end, and installing a device at the destination end to measure the voltage changes as they occur and respond appropriately. A voltage applied at one end of the wire will diminish in intensity as the electric current travels through the wire - i.e., electrical resistance. If the applied voltage is low enough or the wire is long enough, there may be no detectable voltage change at the other end. In effect, no signal will have been transmitted. The solutions are 1) goose the voltage input so that there is enough left after the line resistance for the receiving device to detect, or 2) slow down the voltage changes and design the device on the other end to "listen" for longer intervals to detect the fainter signal. The FCC says you can't do #1 on the public phone network, so you have to do #2. Voltage limits are why analog modem download rates will never exceed 53K (in the US) and why DSL is not available at all on loops longer than 18K feet, and the higher speed DSL packages are not available on loops longer than 12K feet.<br><br>dw]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4673250</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:47:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4672687</link>
<description><![CDATA[lowbwtom posted : A Verizon cable maintenance supervisor has confirmed my assertions regarding dialup speed and dial tone delays caused by Litespan. It would also seem to be accurate to say that the line degradation is a result of a Verizon design decision.<br><br>There are two different "flavors" of Litespan, integrated and non-integrated. One retains normal dialup speeds and the other does not. Verizon engineering has chosen to use the non-integrated (slower) version in order to meet Federal requirements for sharing lines with competitors. Both types of Litespan can be included in the same system, but the engineers have chosen not to do so. It was also asserted that residential dialup speed might not have been considered as a factor in this decision. <br><br>Verizon does not guarantee any modem speed beyond that required by the average fax machine (about 9600 bps). If you get a better connection speed, then you may consider yourself lucky.<br><br>An exploratory contact has been made with NRIC (nric.org), resulting in a telephone call from a Verizon representative within that organization. (They have been very eager to address my concerns.) I intend to pursue the issue, first waiting for a response from NRIC regarding today&#146;s conversation with the Verizon supervisor.<br><br>At this point, it seems that resolution of the problem will depend on management and engineering decisions.<br><br>(PS - I don't think voltage necessarily has anything to do with speed. If that were true, then TV transmitters [high-voltage, high-frequency] and cell phones [low voltage, higher-frequency] would be impossible. Again, these are all design decisions.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4672687</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:57:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4657146</link>
<description><![CDATA[93254336 posted : Also remember that the telco provides residential POTS lines with the specification that they are suitable for voice communications, not data (unless you are paying for a specially conditioned line for that purpose).  So when telco techs try to obtain a subscriber loop free of the abovementioned V.90 modem problems for a customer, they're doing it as a courtesy, not as a requirement of service.<br><br>- Dan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4657146</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2002 03:38:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4654868</link>
<description><![CDATA[ATTek posted : Thank you, Mr White. Older pair gain systems had bandwidth issues that caused problems with analog modems, but the newer litespans have only the 2 D/A drawback. I guess I was not clear is stating that the design of the modem was the issue, not the carrier. This problem has been common knowledge for years(take a peek in the dialup forum). To further make the point, some of the newer litespans in which the CO end of the system is integrated into the switch don't have this problem due to the fact that there is now only one D/A conversion(the one in the field at the R/T) and full v.90 speeds are not a problem. In alot of these cases, speed is better on the litespan than it is on copper to the same premise because to loop is long enough to require load coils. Now I have no scientific evidence to back this up, but I have read and have been told that load coils on the line have the same effect on a v.90 modem as D/A conversions. I have in the past moved customers to these integrated pair gain to improve their performance....that is, unless they act like an ass and claim the big, bad, ILEC is trying to kill their 56K modem performance and make them order DSL which isn't available because they're 35KFeet from the CO and Project Pronto hasn't reached them yet:) Project Pronto, by the way, is a perfect example of the original topic of this thread!<br><SMALL>--<br>What does THIS button do.....</SMALL><br><i>[text was edited by author 2002-10-08 22:15:24]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4654868</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 22:12:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4652013</link>
<description><![CDATA[dick white posted : lowbwtom, welcome to the forum.<br><br>I am not an electrical engineer, and so I can't quibble with you about the technical aspects of high speed converters. However, PacBellTek is correct, but for very different reason. The FCC regulations for devices on the public phone network limit the voltage at which a customer device may operate. A so-called "56K" V.90 computer modem is not permitted to send with enough voltage to get above 33K upload rates. A much more tightly controlled digital modem operated by an ISP with a direct connection to the public network may pump down to the end-consumer at up to 53K (i.e., 56K, while theoretically possible, will never be seen in real life). There may be no further intervening D/A conversions while keeping the 53K speed. The additional D/A conversion must be effected at no more than the analog rate, which with compression is 33.4 at best (though lower actual throughput is likely). That is why a local loop with a fiber segment will choke your analog modem.<br><br>Now, your notion that phone company management has an ulterior motive in deploying LiteSpan, well that may be so, but you'll never be able to prove it...<br><br>dw]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4652013</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:07:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4651445</link>
<description><![CDATA[lowbwtom posted : PacBellTek - I respectfully disagree. I am an electrical engineer with quite a few years (decades) experience. The only reason an extra A/D or D/A conversion would limit the speed of a link is because the designer would not (or could not, see management) spend the money for the high-speed converters. A 1 mega-bit per second DA/AD is a common component. It just costs a few cents more. This is why I say it was an intentional design decision.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4651445</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 17:08:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4651266</link>
<description><![CDATA[ATTek posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/700975" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=700975');">lowbwtom</a>:</SMALL><HR> They have intentionally (by design) limited the bandwidth of the copper connections to each residence in order to "encourage" more customers to sign up for DSL. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Completely false......the reason your speed dropped is because you now have 2 digital to analog conversions in you line where you had none on copper. 56K analog transmission will not work with more than one D/A conversion.<br><small>--<br>What does THIS button do.....</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4651266</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:48:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4651140</link>
<description><![CDATA[Alex G Bell posted : Interesting, of course as long as voice frequencies (e.g. below 10 KHz) and signaling frequencies are passed, Litespan could save bandwidth on the fiber by cutting bandwidth on the loop.  I'll check into it.<br><small>--<br>"Remember, Comrade, people who are willing to destroy an efficient telephone system may not be playing with a full deck."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4651140</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:36:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4651123</link>
<description><![CDATA[Aggie Dan posted : Cariad is responding to the fact that you responded to a post that was over a month since the last time someone posted to it.  Thus "bumping it up" higher in the list of forum threads, since they go by most recent post.<br><br>Cariad, should you possibly lock this thread?<br><small>--<br>Note : The statements made by myself on DSL Reports are purely my own and is not in anyway to be considered indicative of the opinions of my employer or of my coworkers.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4651123</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:35:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4651026</link>
<description><![CDATA[lowbwtom posted : ...<br><i>[text was edited by author 2002-10-08 17:15:18]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4651026</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 16:24:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4650194</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cariad posted : Welcome to the Verizon forum lowbwtom. <br><br>Please try and not bump up old threads, even if you're providing an answer. Chances are the question has already been answered and the member has moved on. <br><br>If you think you can provided additional information, start a new thread, and link to the old one. <br><br>Thanks. <br><small>--<br><I>Ryw in fwy na perffaith rydw in Gymraes.</I></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4650194</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:10:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Litespan limits dialup bandwidth?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4650165</link>
<description><![CDATA[lowbwtom posted : I just had a Verizon technician tell me that the litespan system they are installing up to my neighborhood is the reason why my dialup speed dropped from 48k to 24k.  They have intentionally (by design) limited the bandwidth of the copper connections to each residence in order to "encourage" more customers to sign up for DSL. Of course, limiting bandwidth also increases the number of customers that can be served with a given fiber channel, and thus reduces their costs. I think we might raise h_ll about this.... Not everyone wants to drop $30-$50 per month on DSL.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Litespan-limits-dialup-bandwidth-4650165</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:07:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4140533</link>
<description><![CDATA[Alex G Bell posted : I was aware that Alcatel had purchased the rights to manufacture the Litespan system under its name.  Alcatel is a French company that manufactures a variety of telephone equipment.  I don't doubt your sincerity either.<br><small>--<br>"Remember, Comrade, people who are willing to destroy an efficient telephone system may not be playing with a full deck."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4140533</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:49:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4140353</link>
<description><![CDATA[believemenow posted : I have seen what Alcatel has provided and here's some more food-for-thought:  Did you also know that Litespan was not developed by Alcatel?  Alcatel was already in the DSL business and actually bought the company that provided the Litespan ASAMs.  They then encorporated some of this technology and came out with what they believed to be a better or more streamline ASAM (called the Alcatel 1000).  They are still upgrading these systems and Verizon is beginning to use the new model Alcatel 7100 ASAM.  These systems are even more efficient and streamline than the earlier ASAMs.  The description that I gave it what Verizon employees and offices use when they refer to the old DSL platform.  So the old terms/platform are Litespan or CAP and Verizon is now using the new ASAMs, aka DMT platform.  If you know any employees that have been there for more than 2+ years, they will verify the information that I have given.  I have read some of your responses in here and can see that you are very helpful with your words.  I am not trying to rock the boat since I am new to these forums.  Like you, I just want to help others in their dealings with DSL and Verizon.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4140353</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:27:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4140219</link>
<description><![CDATA[Alex G Bell posted : All the words you may say still do not make your description correct.  All people have to do is follow the link I provided to see.  Like you said, however, you NEVER know what background people come in here with, and that works both ways.  I will not argue this anymore.<br><small>--<br>"Remember, Comrade, people who are willing to destroy an efficient telephone system may not be playing with a full deck."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4140219</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:13:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4139868</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I have to agree with believemenow, litespan was ALSO a type of dslam, the cool thing about it was that it for the most part always worked. It was also pre-provisioned, meaning where you were wired actually determined what speeds you were going to get. Of course you were not wired at random. It just seemed that way to some people.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4139868</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:31:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4135086</link>
<description><![CDATA[believemenow posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>I don't know where "believemenow" has obtained his information, but his description of the "Lightspan" system is confusing and inaccurate. It is not a "DSL" system at all.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>  Ok, mister smarty pants AlexGBell, you seem to have all the answers, figure this one.  YOU go work for verizon, YOU be a technician in the field and in the office, YOU fix DSL when it's brought across your desk, and YOU manage different teams that fix and provision these customers.  YOU also need to watch how critical you are of others, you NEVER know what background people come in here with.  With that said, my paragraph above IS accurate.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4135086</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:58:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4133174</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : verizon owns a company called verizon ave. VA puts dslams into buildings where there are currently litespans. In many cases some people get dsl from VA others from VOL over copper pairs (if avail.) I think the whole reason why verizon doesnt do dsl over fiber is that they would have to let competitors use those special cards at a fraction of what they cost, and then verizon would also be responsible for maintaining the cards should they break, etc.<br><br>One way around that is they own VAve, which is a seperate company that doesnt have to let anyone use their equipment..<br><br>It gets pretty wierd, when a custmor calls VZ for DSL, they are not allowed to steer them off to VZave (that would be anti-competitive) they take the order and if there is no avail. copper the customer is told they cant have it. Its up to the customer to find out that VZave is in their building either by word of mouth or lobby setups by vzave every so often!<br><br>Weird how regulations screw the consumer!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4133174</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:49:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4131093</link>
<description><![CDATA[jopizz9 posted : The way it will work is that the DSL cards in the remote litespan will act as the DSLAM. The voice will be sent back to the CO litespan unit and the data will be sent to an ATM switch at the CO.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4131093</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:28:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4129814</link>
<description><![CDATA[Alex G Bell posted : I don't know where "believemenow" has obtained his information, but his description of the "Lightspan" system is confusing and inaccurate.  It is not a "DSL" system at all.  Phone companies have, however, been using DSL technology for years to allow them to mux several POTS lines together over a single copper pair, ranging from 2 to 8 lines.  DSL technology is also used currently as the "last leg" in a T-1 system from the C.O. to a customer when on copper.<br><br>Litespan, however, does not use DSL as its signal carrying system between the vault and the C.O.  It is simply a mux that allows a number of different signals to be carried on fiber between a vault and a C.O.  (e.g. a POTS line, a 56K data circuit, a T-1, etc. can be input at the Litespan vault, muxed into a very broadband light beam that is carried to the C.O. on fiber, and in turn presented to another Litespan where upon it is demuxed and the original signals conveyed through POTS, 56K data, T-1, etc. cards to copper and then wired through the Mainframe just as if they came into the C.O. on copper.)  The Litespan product, currently made by Alcatel, can be populated and configured with various cards per service needed.<br><br>Now, there are two ways that DSL can be provided to customers through a Litespan system.  The first is by purchasing actual DSL add-on cards for the Litespan system vault; these would provide the DSL signal to the customer.  In the C.O. the Litespan card would not convert the signal to DSL (there is no need or reason to do this).  Likely the C.O. cards would mux a number of DSL originating cards (in the vault) to a T-1 output on the C.O. Litespan unit.<br><br>See:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.alcatel.com/products/productsummary.jhtml?_DARGS=%2Fcommon%2Fopg%2Fproducts%2Finclude%2Fproductbrief.jhtml_A&_DAV=%2Fx%2Fopgproduct%2FLitespan_2000.jhtml" >www.alcatel.com/products &middot;&middot;&middot; 0.jhtml</A><br><br>The second way of providing DSL to the customer from a vault is to put a small DSLAM in the vault.  The DSLAM would have a T-1 output that is connected to a T-1 card on the Litespan unit.  At the C.O. there is also a T-1 card on the Litespan.  The output of the T-1 may then be muxed in to a T-3 just like the C.O. DSLAM outputs a T-3.<br><br>I am not aware of which method big V intends to use.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Remember, Comrade, people who are willing to destroy an efficient telephone system may not be playing with a full deck."</SMALL><br><I>[text was edited by author 2002-08-14 18:08:42]</I><br><br><i>[text was edited by author 2002-08-14 18:13:20]</i>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4129814</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:06:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4129490</link>
<description><![CDATA[93254336 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by TheFamilyGuy:</SMALL><HR>This whole lightspan thing sounds like a real nightmare. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>It sounds like the Lightspan DSL technology itself has been tested and ready to deploy for awhile, but Verizon (and other ILECs) have been waiting until the CLEC access issue is "resolved."<br><br>In all fairness, internet access through cable modem can be a real nightmare as well... just ask anyone who went through the @home meltdown.<br><br>- Dan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4129490</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:33:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4128751</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hooper posted : Most cable companies don't have contracts. Since you live in Cranbury, you probably have Comcast or Cablevision. I know Comcast for a fact has no contract, and no installation fees if you do a self install. I would get the cable while you wait for the dsl. This whole lightspan thing sounds like a real nightmare.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4128751</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:22:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4128542</link>
<description><![CDATA[blakbas posted : Not true, here in Verizon of Va.  We have already started upgrading our vaults and cabinets to support DSL. A minimum of two more fibers need to be pulled to each vault/cabinet. As stated by Alex Bell, Verizon is waiting for that bill (forget what it is called) to be passed. Basically stating that what ever we install, build, maintain ect ect. is our sole property and may deny access to others outside of Verizon, (after a certain date). If that bill gets passed then you will see orders taken over litespan. If it does not get passed, not sure what will happen.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4128542</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:56:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4125558</link>
<description><![CDATA[Omne posted : The reason it hasn't been more widely distributed is the cost simply put it is not cost efficient for the local companies to put in use. I do know pac bell was trial the remote gateway about 6months to a year ago.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4125558</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:52:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4125549</link>
<description><![CDATA[93254336 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by Alex G Bell:</SMALL><HR>I believe issue had to do with the Baby Bells not wanting CLECs to install equipment in their vaults.  Don't know if this is resolved yet, but the approval to allow DSL on Lightspan should open up DSL to a lot of users who formerly could not get it.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>A few weeks ago I was talking with a telco tech about Lightspan, and he told me that, as mentioned above, the delay is due to CLEC access to Verizon's remote vaults.<br><br>There are three possible outcomes:<br><br>1.  Verizon would allow the CLECs to install equipment in Verizon's vaults, or<br><br>2.  Verizon would build separate vaults for CLEC equipment, or<br><br>3.  the FCC would not require Verizon to provide CLEC access to their vaults.<br><br>According to this tech, #3 is the most likely scenario, in which case Verizon could deploy Lightspan cards relatively quickly.<br><br>- Dan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4125549</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:51:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4125416</link>
<description><![CDATA[blakbas posted : I could not answer that question about testing (lowly service tech) but I do know that it works. Here in Va. (Tysons Corner) the CEO of AOL has Verizon DSL through Litespan. As far as I know it works and he is the only one that has it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4125416</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:33:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4125283</link>
<description><![CDATA[andegold posted : Thanks for the info everyone.  Not that I thought this guy was feeding me a line it's just that he was talking way over my head.  I understand a little bit more now.<br><br>Anybody have any suggestions on my next dilemma then?  Cable may or may not be available to me immediately.  That is, I may be eligible for high speed residential service at a great price or maybe only plodding along with commercial service slow speeds at triple the cost or more.  I could take the cable now and probably be locked in on a contract - I don't know about that yet, or I could wait out the installation of these cards.  The engineer said it should be installed in about six weeks but he also agreed with my concern that it could take another six months to test and debug the installation.  Does anyone know what kind of testing is done and what kinds of problems are likely?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4125283</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:07:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4124950</link>
<description><![CDATA[blakbas posted : Seems to me that these are the cards that will allow DSL to pass over litespan. The DSL equipment will still remain in the CO. Its kinda like the ISDN cards that we use in our PG (DLC) systems.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4124950</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:00:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4123342</link>
<description><![CDATA[believemenow posted : Lightspan or CAP (as is is better known) is the original DSL equipment that Verizon launched.  This CAP platform is almost, in every CO, been replaced with the new DMT platform.  This is the upgraded DSL equipment that Verizon currently uses and is implementing even more capable DMT equipment.<br>Now, this engineer speaks of fiber feeding your office building.  Fiber is cheaper in the long run to serve dial tone customers and, as we all know, DSL will not run on it.  These lightspan cards are most likely what the DSL lab has been testing for quite some time now to enable equipment to be installed further out from the CO.  This equipment is basically to extend the loop length qualifications to much further lengths.  It is very similar to "fiber-to-the curb" technology.  In other words, your dial tone is fed from the CO like normal and most likely will be wired to the DSL equipment in the field instead of in the CO.  The field equipment and the CO equipment talk so the signal can be transmitted to the rest of the network.<br>Hope this may help.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4123342</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:26:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4119303</link>
<description><![CDATA[Alex G Bell posted : I believe issue had to do with the Baby Bells not wanting CLECs to install equipment in their vaults.  Don't know if this is resolved yet, but the approval to allow DSL on Lightspan should open up DSL to a lot of users who formerly could not get it.<br><small>--<br>"Remember, Comrade, people who are willing to destroy an efficient telephone system may not be playing with a full deck."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4119303</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:25:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4118273</link>
<description><![CDATA[jopizz9 posted : The litespan has an ADSL channel bank. Since it handles both voice and data it probably is regulated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4118273</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:25:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What is Lightspan or Lightspeed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4117787</link>
<description><![CDATA[andegold posted : In my never ending quest to get straight answers out of Verizon I spoke with their area engineer today.  He said my problem is actually one of distance not fiber.  In the past I was told my problem getting DSL was that I had fiber straight from the CO to the parking lot vault at my office.  Now I'm told the problem is actually distance (although there's still no talk of copper) and that Verizon just got approval from the FCC to install Lightspeed (Lightspan?) cards in the CO and in the vaults and/or remote locations that would enable me to get DSL.<br><br>Is this really DSL or is it some other form of transmission?<br><br>What does this card do that FCC approval (having something to do with competition) is required yet when I call the BPU or the FCC they both tell me that data services are unregulated and there are no tariffs?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/What-is-Lightspan-or-Lightspeed-4117787</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:33:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
