<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Goodbye Mediacom&#x27; in forum &#x27;Mediacom&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4292800</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 13:58:28 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 13:58:28 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4319544</link>
<description><![CDATA[YearZero4 posted : Hey try this for me.. Do you have any free computer that you can run other tests with... I had a ton of problems too then I reformated my computer and it opened up and accepted all the bandwidth. Also when I use to have roadrunner I was using AOL and it was keeping download speeds really slow so I reformated and everything worked beautiful. What I am saying is that over the course of using your computer you can install and add certain things to just make one little thing not work to it's full potential. I know a reformat is drastic but overall a majority of the times it works. I use to have mediacom a few weeks ago before I moved out to KS to use Cox and before I got on there networks I did a reformat also.<br><small>--<br>"So hands on the bible, scared like a child, God holds you liable for what you've done"- Local H</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4319544</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 15:24:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4314089</link>
<description><![CDATA[furtadomh posted : I have had problems with my account after I transfered it.  I came unregistered about 4 times over a two week period in late august.  I had to call four times and give mediacom the mac address to my modem.  They said the local office was missing information but when I call them they said they weren't. I haven't had any problems with registration but my connects gone down the drain. I check sas.r21... once and awhile and it shows me registered.  On a different note I got a bill for august that is totally bizare.  They claim I owed 15$ from last month which I have the bank statement to disprove.  Then somehow end up with a -16.52 credit.  Theres nothing left to do but laugh. <br><br>Is my modem dead or something?<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/quality/nil/852424">/quali &middot;&middot;&middot; /852424</A><br><br><br>Mon 09/02/2002 <br> 9:16p<br><br>pinging dslreports.com [209.123.109.175] with 32 bytes of data:<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=313ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=204ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=204ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=329ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=329ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=297ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=246<br><br>Request timed out.<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=344ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=344ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=641ms TTL=246<br><br>Ping statistics for 209.123.109.175:<br><br>    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 19, Lost = 1 (5% loss),<br><br>Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:<br><br>    Minimum = 47ms, Maximum =  641ms, Average =  250ms<br><br>=========================================================== <br><br>Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br><br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1   234 ms    78 ms   219 ms  10.17.240.1 <br><br>  2   141 ms   281 ms    94 ms  12.215.16.161 <br><br>  3    31 ms    31 ms   141 ms  12.215.5.18 <br><br>  4   375 ms    32 ms    93 ms  12.123.4.162 <br><br>  5   188 ms   219 ms   265 ms  12.122.11.37 <br><br>  6   266 ms   328 ms   375 ms  12.122.10.49 <br><br>  7   203 ms    94 ms   359 ms  12.123.214.181 <br><br>  8   141 ms    63 ms   187 ms  12.119.140.30 <br><br>  9   266 ms   172 ms   312 ms  209.123.11.237 <br><br> 10   188 ms   250 ms   110 ms  209.123.109.175 <br><i>[text was edited by author 2002-09-02 22:54:54]</i>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4314089</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 22:44:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4311689</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rapt0r32 posted : Upon looking at these Trace and pings I am beginning to wonder if he is even registered correctly. I have seen in some cases where it will play havoc with you because account is not registered correctly. Just a thought...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4311689</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 18:49:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4310962</link>
<description><![CDATA[marigolds posted : Avalon is a good little company.  The owner (Dave Lacey) happens to be the guy who wrote most of the code for the bbs that is advertised in my signature :)<br>There is one little thing to be wary up related to the upstream provider for avalon.net that I can tell you about in PM.<br><small>--<br>ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet<BR>telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu<BR>or Go to<BR> &raquo;<A HREF="http://isca.whiteboard.net" >isca.whiteboard.net</A> for more information (and java telnet access)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4310962</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 17:28:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4308896</link>
<description><![CDATA[furtadomh posted : The prog I used was 3d tracert. It automatcially runs for a few mins to get avgs and other things.Nice little piece of freeware.  Here is the output from the mediacom prog the tech sent me.  I use drtcp and don't have any setting out of the ordinary.  No other speed tweaks installed.  Ive run adaware and antivirus. Signal strengths are fine.  I have no clue what the problem is.<br><br>Mon 09/02/2002 <br>12:24p<br><br>Windows 2000 IP Configuration<br><br>	Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : C1865397-A<br>	Primary DNS Suffix  . . . . . . . : <br>	Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast<br><br>	IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No<br><br>	WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No<br><br>	DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : mchsi.com<br><br>Ethernet adapter Mediacom:<br><br>	Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : mchsi.com<br>	Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel 8255x-based PCI Ethernet Adapter (10/100)<br>	Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-A0-C9-3E-2D-83<br><br>	DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes<br><br>	Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes<br><br>	IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : <br><br>	Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.252.0<br><br>	Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 12.217.248.1<br><br>	DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 12.223.4.34<br><br>	DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 204.127.202.4<br>	                                    216.148.227.68<br>	NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled<br><br>	Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Monday, September 02, 2002 12:23:40 PM<br><br>	Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Friday, September 06, 2002 12:23:40 PM<br><br>================================================================== <br><br>Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [64.58.76.176] with 32 bytes of data:<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=407ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=313ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=297ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=313ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=266ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=157ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=360ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=578ms TTL=241<br><br>Request timed out.<br><br>Request timed out.<br><br>Request timed out.<br><br>Request timed out.<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=407ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=547ms TTL=241<br><br>Reply from 64.58.76.176: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=241<br><br>Ping statistics for 64.58.76.176:<br><br>    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 16, Lost = 4 (20% loss),<br><br>Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:<br><br>    Minimum = 157ms, Maximum =  578ms, Average =  261ms<br><br>=========================================================== <br><br>Tracing route to www.yahoo.akadns.net [64.58.76.176]<br><br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1   172 ms   235 ms   156 ms  10.17.240.1 <br><br>  2   141 ms   312 ms   219 ms  12.215.16.161 <br><br>  3   360 ms   203 ms   140 ms  12.215.5.18 <br><br>  4    94 ms   141 ms   406 ms  12.123.4.166 <br><br>  5   391 ms   344 ms  1437 ms  12.122.11.33 <br><br>  6     *        *        *     Request timed out.<br><br>  7     *     2984 ms  2219 ms  12.122.11.218 <br><br>  8   703 ms   703 ms   719 ms  192.205.32.110 <br><br>  9  1578 ms  2610 ms  1093 ms  208.172.146.103 <br><br> 10   375 ms   282 ms   562 ms  208.172.156.9 <br><br> 11   203 ms   266 ms   453 ms  208.172.156.74 <br><br> 12   297 ms   281 ms   297 ms  64.56.192.17 <br><br> 13   313 ms   234 ms   375 ms  216.32.132.17 <br><br> 14   188 ms   375 ms   140 ms  216.109.66.132 <br><br> 15   438 ms   547 ms   156 ms  216.33.98.19 <br><br> 16   203 ms   329 ms   328 ms  216.35.210.126 <br><br> 17   297 ms   469 ms   250 ms  64.58.76.176 <br><br>Trace complete.<br><br>Mon 09/02/2002 <br>12:30p<br><br>Windows 2000 IP Configuration<br><br>	Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : C1865397-A<br>	Primary DNS Suffix  . . . . . . . : <br>	Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast<br><br>	IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No<br><br>	WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No<br><br>	DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : mchsi.com<br><br>Ethernet adapter Mediacom:<br><br>	Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : mchsi.com<br>	Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel 8255x-based PCI Ethernet Adapter (10/100)<br>	Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-A0-C9-3E-2D-83<br><br>	DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes<br><br>	Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes<br><br>	IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : <br><br>	Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.252.0<br><br>	Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 12.217.248.1<br><br>	DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 12.223.4.34<br><br>	DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 204.127.202.4<br>	                                    216.148.227.68<br>	NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled<br><br>	Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Monday, September 02, 2002 12:23:40 PM<br><br>	Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Friday, September 06, 2002 12:23:40 PM<br><br>================================================================== <br><br>Pinging dslreports.com [209.123.109.175] with 32 bytes of data:<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=1125ms TTL=246<br><br>Request timed out.<br><br>Request timed out.<br><br>Request timed out.<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=297ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=187ms TTL=246<br><br>Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=1187ms TTL=246<br><br>Ping statistics for 209.123.109.175:<br><br>    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 17, Lost = 3 (15% loss),<br><br>Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:<br><br>    Minimum = 47ms, Maximum =  1187ms, Average =  253ms<br><br>=========================================================== <br><br>Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br><br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1   610 ms   109 ms    63 ms  10.17.240.1 <br><br>  2   188 ms   328 ms   297 ms  12.215.16.161 <br><br>  3   422 ms   546 ms   266 ms  12.215.5.18 <br><br>  4   266 ms   203 ms   141 ms  12.123.4.162 <br><br>  5   313 ms   125 ms   140 ms  12.122.11.37 <br><br>  6   156 ms   141 ms   141 ms  12.122.10.49 <br><br>  7   203 ms   188 ms    62 ms  12.123.214.181 <br><br>  8   141 ms   219 ms   172 ms  12.119.140.30 <br><br>  9    93 ms    94 ms   406 ms  209.123.11.237 <br><br> 10   578 ms   109 ms   157 ms  209.123.109.175 <br><br>Trace complete.<br><i>[text was edited by author 2002-09-02 13:34:29]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4308896</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 13:33:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4306607</link>
<description><![CDATA[TheXerox posted : The tracert there looks a little odd (guess I'm so accustomed to seeing it from the Command Prompt) the 1547ms coming from the cable modem seems VERY out of place. Are you certain you don't have anything on your computer which would be messing with tcp/ip in some way?? Some kind of tweaks perhaps?? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4306607</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 04:27:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4304848</link>
<description><![CDATA[furtadomh posted : Ive looked a little bit at dsl and the only option seems to be qwest with avalon.  Ive yet to hear something good about msn/dsl?  I challenge someone from mediacom to tell me why I should pay for this:<br><br>www.dslreports.com<br><br>Hop	IP	Hostname	last [ms]	min [ms]	max [ms]	ava. [ms]	var. [ms]	total Loss	Longitude	Latitude	Altitude	RTTL<br>1	10.17.240.1	10.17.240.1	47	15	1547	111	243					255<br>2	12.215.16.161	12.215.16.161	31	15	1250	92	191					254<br>3	12.215.5.14	12.215.5.14	219	15	1156	100	161					249<br>4	12.123.216.38	gbr6-p57.cgcil.ip.att.net	187	15	454	78	73					250<br>5	12.122.11.37	tbr1-p013602.cgcil.ip.att.net	63	15	328	81	65					251<br>6	12.122.10.49	tbr1-p012101.n54ny.ip.att.net	62	31	281	88	45					250<br>7	12.123.214.181	gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net	63	31	313	89	55					249<br>8	12.119.140.30	12.119.140.30	31	31	469	87	71					248<br>9	209.123.11.237	a9-0-0-152.msfc1.oct.nac.net	31	31	266	99	56					247<br>10	209.123.109.175	www.dslreports.com	125	31	375	101	58	1				246<br><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4304848</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 23:25:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4296024</link>
<description><![CDATA[marigolds posted : I've kinda decided dsl is the only way to go for internet games anyway.  Anything that requires low latency is a bad idea on mediacom in iowa city.<br>It seems like everything has a tradeoff with computers :/ Athlon vs. Intel, RDRAM vs. DDR, SCSI vs. IDE, LCD vs. CRT, Cable bandwidth vs. DSL latency.<br><small>--<br>ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet<BR>telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu<BR>or Go to<BR> &raquo;<A HREF="http://isca.whiteboard.net" >isca.whiteboard.net</A> for more information (and java telnet access)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4296024</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:14:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4294542</link>
<description><![CDATA[furtadomh posted : Thanks for the suggestions.  Im really sick of fighting with Mediacom on something Ive realized will never be fixed. I just want to be finished with the whole ordeal. Ive wasted far too much time and energy as a consumer. I have documented my problems over the last 8 months and will send a letter to the city.  I will look into dsl and finish out september with Mediacom.  I told the tech I noticed slower speeds when everyone moved back.  He said yes my connection would be slower. Its simple I refuse to pay more for a slower connection.  Anyway thanks again I wouldve been lost without this board.          <br><br><br>On a side note I would like the $20 credit I was promised.<br>Account#8723150040029417<br>To: "Jason Monroe"  was the tech who told me I would recieve it for my outages in June<br><br><i>[text was edited by author 2002-08-31 21:41:11]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4294542</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 20:20:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4293889</link>
<description><![CDATA[marigolds posted : Hey furtadomh,<br>   Do the local franchise a favor... call up and ask to talk to the franchise manager or the head tech (I forget their last name's right now, but both were named Rick.  Also, Rich Brunner was the head guy for cable modem techs.  The franchise manager is the same guy, but the rest might have changed).<br>And tell them that the tech ignored the problem you were having and walked out the door on you, and hence you canceled.<br>(as a side note, this may get you a partial refund or an offer of up to 3+ months of free service, but I wouldn't hold my breath on it).<br>There are lots of dsl options in the area (all through qwest, but tons of better ISPs than qwest).<br><small>--<br>ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet<BR>telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu<BR>or Go to<BR> &raquo;<A HREF="http://isca.whiteboard.net" >isca.whiteboard.net</A> for more information (and java telnet access)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4293889</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:43:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4292859</link>
<description><![CDATA[DJ posted : That stinks what they've been putting you through. It might be interesting to see how the customer rep will react when you call to cancel. Any ideas on who you'll turn to for broadband? Or is dial-up going to be the norm, since that's pretty much what you were getting with Mediacom. Sorry to see you go! :[<br><br><I>edited to change sad face from :( to :[</I><br><i>[text was edited by author 2002-08-31 18:58:22]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Goodbye-Mediacom-4292859</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:13:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Goodbye Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Goodbye-Mediacom-4292800</link>
<description><![CDATA[furtadomh posted : The service tech came today ran a speed test at some random site that showed my speed was over 2mb dl.  Said my connection was fine and looked at me like I was crazy.  I tried to show him the tracerts but he didn't look at any of them.  I told him I would have to cancel my account if there wasn't anything he could do.  He didn't say anything walked out the door and left.  I don't understand why dl speed is the be all end all of connections.  Ive never dl at anything faster than 200k.  I tried to tell him I play internet games and I ping the equivalnt of a 56k modem he didnt care.  So after a year of trying to make things work with mediacom I give up.  They wouldn't even meet me halfway.  Ive been lied to, ignored and replaced hardware that wasn't broken.  So thanks to the small group of people on this board who actually seem to care.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Goodbye-Mediacom-4292800</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:06:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
