<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: The Sky&#x27;s the Limits, Oh Look, it&#x27;s Snowing...&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-Skys-the-Limits-Oh-Look-its-Snowing-5204093</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:14:18 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:14:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: The Sky&#x27;s the Limits, Oh Look, it&#x27;s Snowing...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-Skys-the-Limits-Oh-Look-its-Snowing-5212925</link>
<description><![CDATA[AthlGrond posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/147789" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=147789');">Rob Froelich</a>:</SMALL><HR>Yeah I know these guys and have been pretty close to the discussions in the tri-cities<br><br>1) capping - probably not going to be necessary since the reason for caps is usually a shortage of local bandwidth (most noticeable on cable where hundreds or thousands can share a single 30Mbps down, and about 1Mbps up) and not backbone IP traffic. <br><br>2) re AUP - I've heard that the tri-cities are thinking of allowing ISP to connect to their local network and sell to end users that way (since they'll have huge local bandwidth to everyone). <br><br>3) re spam - the same as any other ISP, since the IP will probably be handled by established ISP that want to serve the area.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Sounds good to me. (Thanks for explaining BTW)<br><br>Too bad the Denver city council is more interested in giving themselves a 20% raise and laying off city workers to get involved in investing in infrastructure. :[]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-Skys-the-Limits-Oh-Look-its-Snowing-5212925</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 14:07:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The Sky&#x27;s the Limits, Oh Look, it&#x27;s Snowing...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-Skys-the-Limits-Oh-Look-its-Snowing-5204224</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rob Froelich posted : Yeah I know these guys and have been pretty close to the discussions in the tri-cities<br><br>1) capping - probably not going to be necessary since the reason for caps is usually a shortage of local bandwidth (most noticeable on cable where hundreds or thousands can share a single 30Mbps down, and about 1Mbps up) and not backbone IP traffic. <br><br>2) re AUP - I've heard that the tri-cities are thinking of allowing ISP to connect to their local network and sell to end users that way (since they'll have huge local bandwidth to everyone). <br><br>3) re spam - the same as any other ISP, since the IP will probably be handled by established ISP that want to serve the area. <br><small>--<br>Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-Skys-the-Limits-Oh-Look-its-Snowing-5204224</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2002 18:06:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Sky&#x27;s the Limits, Oh Look, it&#x27;s Snowing...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-Skys-the-Limits-Oh-Look-its-Snowing-5204093</link>
<description><![CDATA[AthlGrond posted : This sounds like a great idea!<br><br>I wonder how long it will take the municipal provider to cap people's service.  What will their AUP look like?  How will they handle spamers?<br><br>I hope they have a plan for those kinds of things...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-Skys-the-Limits-Oh-Look-its-Snowing-5204093</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2002 17:53:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
