Topic 'I wish AT&T would get their act together...' in forum 'W.O.W.' - dslreports.com http://www.dslreports.com/forum/I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5509500 en Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:05:49 EDT Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:05:49 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5673198 traceroute chi.speakeasy.net
traceroute to chi.speakeasy.net (64.81.159.2), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 d60-1-224 (65.60.224.1) 32.335 ms 23.816 ms 33.169 ms
2 d60-1-224 (65.60.224.1) 15.633 ms 172.31.15.253 (172.31.15.253) 10.656 ms *
3 12.124.15.69 (12.124.15.69) 11.884 ms 27.216 ms 17.223 ms
4 gbr2-p70.dtrmi.ip.att.net (12.123.139.26) 11.991 ms 23.287 ms 22.741 ms
5 tbr2-p012701.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.122.2.194) 30.171 ms 41.956 ms 49.459 ms
6 gbr6-p20.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.122.11.62) 68.954 ms 62.128 ms 66.493 ms
7 gar2-p370.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.123.5.221) 57.124 ms 82.290 ms 95.370 ms
8 gar1-p3100.chail.ip.att.net (12.123.216.130) 50.865 ms 36.130 ms 93.111 ms
9 * * *
10 border5.ge4-1-bbnet2.chg.pnap.net (64.94.32.74) 25.857 ms 34.012 ms 31.459 ms
11 chi.speakeasy.net (64.81.159.2) 43.098 ms 42.052 ms 24.115 ms]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5673198 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:34:25 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5672004 over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms d60-1-140.try.wideopenwest.com [65.60.140.1]
2 12 ms 10 ms 26 ms 172.31.15.253
3 13 ms 15 ms 12 ms 12.124.15.69
4 11 ms 10 ms 12 ms gbr2-p70.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.139.26]
5 * * 3112 ms tbr2-p013002.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.113]
6 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms gbr6-p20.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.62]
7 18 ms 19 ms 20 ms gar3-p370.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.5]
8 19 ms 19 ms 22 ms gar1-p340.chail.ip.att.net [12.123.216.134]
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 19 ms 19 ms 17 ms border5.ge4-1-bbnet2.chg.pnap.net [64.94.32.74]

11 20 ms 21 ms 19 ms chi.speakeasy.net [64.81.159.2]

Trace complete.

One apple ruines the whole tree (or something like that) :P

Good thing I'm not an online gamer]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5672004 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:50:55 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5640789 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5640789 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:04:58 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5640281 

  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2    12 ms    10 ms    11 ms  d60-1-212.try.wideopenwest.com [65.60.212.1]
  3    10 ms    13 ms    13 ms  172.31.15.253
  4   218 ms   218 ms   216 ms  12.124.15.37
  5   233 ms   236 ms   229 ms  gbr2-p70.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.139.26]
  6   222 ms   207 ms   207 ms  tbr2-p012701.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.194]
  7   205 ms   212 ms   209 ms  ggr1-p3100.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.210]
  8   205 ms   212 ms   218 ms  p6-0.chcgil2-cr8.bbnplanet.net [4.24.224.53]
  9   211 ms   209 ms   215 ms  so-3-3-0.chcgil2-br2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.9.45]
 10   211 ms   203 ms   207 ms  p1-0.chcgil2-cr2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.9.34]
 11   199 ms   217 ms   229 ms  p0-0.icnet.bbnplanet.net [4.24.203.66]
 12   253 ms     *      233 ms  rtr-cst-bs-int2-a1-0.netequip.depaul.edu [206.220.243.169]
 13     *        *      246 ms  mfc-cst-bs-a-v865.netequip.depaul.edu [140.192.9.58]
 14   243 ms   234 ms   232 ms  mfc-sac-1s-a-v841.netequip.depaul.edu [140.192.5.141]
 15   227 ms   240 ms   235 ms  sac265-215-16.sac.depaul.edu [140.192.215.16]

--
Hey everyone! I'm a WEB HOG!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5640281 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:25:44 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5546007 over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 8 ms 14 ms 9 ms 10.63.176.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 10 ms 12 ms 12 ms 68.42.244.162
6 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms 68.42.244.170
7 16 ms 17 ms 17 ms sl-gw22-chi-6-3.sprintlink.net [144.228.151.177]

8 17 ms 20 ms 17 ms 144.232.10.9
9 17 ms 16 ms 16 ms sl-gw34-chi-10-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.46]

10 56 ms 22 ms 17 ms sl-internap-67-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.223.186
]
11 17 ms 27 ms 22 ms border5.ge4-1-bbnet2.chg.pnap.net [64.94.32.74]

12 18 ms 18 ms 18 ms chi.speakeasy.net [64.81.159.2]

Trace complete.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5546007 Sat, 04 Jan 2003 19:16:54 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5543610
this is quite frustrating.

i am just using speakeasy's servers for reference because they are located all over the country and i normally ping under 100 to all the pops.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5543610 Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:29:39 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5543528
my normal ping is around 20 to 25.
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5543528 Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:22:29 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5540796
1 9 ms 9 ms 7 ms 10.63.176.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 68.42.244.186
6 15 ms 17 ms 16 ms 12.124.15.61
7 16 ms 17 ms 15 ms gbr2-p70.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.139.26]
8 * * * Request timed out.
9 17 ms 16 ms 18 ms ggr1-p3100.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.210]
10 16 ms 16 ms 16 ms p6-0.chcgil2-cr8.bbnplanet.net [4.24.224.53]
11 18 ms 18 ms 17 ms so-3-3-0.chcgil2-br2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.9.45]
12 17 ms 32 ms 18 ms p1-0.chcgil2-cr2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.9.34]
13 17 ms 30 ms 17 ms p0-0.icnet.bbnplanet.net [4.24.203.66]
14 18 ms 17 ms 18 ms rtr-cst-bs-int2-a1-0.netequip.depaul.edu [206.22
0.243.169]
15 88 ms 18 ms 17 ms mfc-cst-bs-v865.netequip.depaul.edu [140.192.9.5
8]
16 17 ms 18 ms 18 ms mfc-sac-1s-a-v841.netequip.depaul.edu [140.192.5
.141]
17 19 ms 18 ms 17 ms stu16.resnet1.depaul.edu [140.192.215.16]

Trace complete.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5540796 Sat, 04 Jan 2003 10:25:07 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5540762
Tracing route to comcast.net [24.153.64.7]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms 10.63.176.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 9 ms 10 ms 10 ms 68.42.244.162
6 17 ms 17 ms 18 ms 12.124.15.61
7 16 ms 20 ms 17 ms gbr1-p70.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.139.22]
8 30 ms 32 ms 32 ms tbr2-p012502.phlpa.ip.att.net [12.122.3.5]
9 35 ms 36 ms 34 ms tbr2-p012501.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.102]
10 33 ms 33 ms 34 ms gbr6-p40.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.11.190]
11 34 ms 34 ms 33 ms gar2-p370.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.123.9.61]
12 35 ms 35 ms 36 ms gar1-p370.abnva.ip.att.net [12.123.217.6]
13 34 ms 36 ms 36 ms 12.119.141.26
14 37 ms 35 ms 35 ms 24.153.64.135
15 * * * Request timed out.
16 36 ms 37 ms 41 ms comcast.net [24.153.64.7]

Trace complete.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5540762 Sat, 04 Jan 2003 10:19:31 EDT Comscam is not looking much better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Comscam-is-not-looking-much-better-5539860 over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 11 ms 27 ms 16 ms 10.65.32.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 14 ms 49 ms 54 ms 68.60.32.254
6 21 ms 26 ms 19 ms sl-gw33-chi-4-0.sprintlink.net [144.228.151.217]

7 21 ms 18 ms 18 ms sl-bb22-chi-4-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.21]
8 48 ms 46 ms 42 ms 144.232.8.186
9 43 ms 61 ms 45 ms so-4-0-0.mp1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.247.10.161
]
10 83 ms 72 ms 72 ms so-2-0-0.mp2.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.0.218]

11 73 ms 72 ms 73 ms gige10-2.ipcolo3.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.2.1
69]
12 81 ms 117 ms 74 ms unknown.Level3.net [64.152.69.30]
13 80 ms 76 ms 76 ms w1.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.71.198]

Trace complete.
--
Ken Spress sirduron @ klondyke . net Please Contact me directly if you have any problems]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Comscam-is-not-looking-much-better-5539860 Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:31:16 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5524212
Reply from 66.218.71.198: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=242
Reply from 66.218.71.198: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=242
Reply from 66.218.71.198: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=242
Reply from 66.218.71.198: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 66.218.71.198:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 138ms, Maximum = 168ms, Average = 150ms

Tracing route to yahoo.com [66.218.71.198]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.254.254
2 12 ms 14 ms 47 ms d60-1-0.try.wideopenwest.com [65.60.150.1]
3 92 ms 25 ms 24 ms 172.31.15.253
4 101 ms 99 ms 94 ms 12.124.15.37
5 117 ms 110 ms 168 ms gbr2-p70.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.139.26]
6 145 ms 119 ms 127 ms tbr2-p012701.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.194]
7 146 ms 164 ms 111 ms ggr2-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.37]
8 86 ms 84 ms 82 ms so-1-1-0.edge1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.0.227.77]
9 110 ms 106 ms 133 ms so-7-0-0.mp1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.244.8.9]
10 145 ms 161 ms 203 ms so-3-0-0.mp1.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.1.129]
11 201 ms 216 ms 153 ms gige9-1.ipcolo3.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.2.73]
12 195 ms 192 ms 225 ms unknown.Level3.net [64.152.69.30]
13 182 ms 200 ms 189 ms w1.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.71.198]

Trace complete.

Garbage]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5524212 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 23:22:40 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5521808 over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 12 ms 11 ms 13 ms d53-1-236.try.wideopenwest.com [64.53.236.1]
2 15 ms 19 ms 19 ms 172.31.15.252
3 35 ms 45 ms 34 ms 12.119.51.181
4 452 ms 465 ms 479 ms gbr2-p51.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.208.134]
5 465 ms 503 ms 413 ms tbr2-p013002.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.113]
6 445 ms 456 ms 443 ms ggr2-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.37]
7 417 ms 489 ms 489 ms so-1-1-0.edge1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.0.227.77]
8 386 ms 421 ms 327 ms so-7-0-0.mp1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.244.8.9]
9 374 ms 358 ms 309 ms so-2-0-0.mp2.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.0.218]
10 168 ms 130 ms 154 ms gige10-1.ipcolo3.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.2.105]
11 282 ms 209 ms 205 ms unknown.Level3.net [64.152.69.30]
12 242 ms 240 ms 194 ms w1.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.71.198]

Trace complete.

:(]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5521808 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 20:10:51 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5521807
Tracing route to 64.37.227.157 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 11 ms 19 ms 9 ms d53-1-230.try.wideopenwest.com [64.53.230.1]
3 17 ms 16 ms 14 ms 172.31.15.252
4 30 ms 30 ms 26 ms 12.119.51.181
5 378 ms 370 ms 358 ms gbr2-p51.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.208.134]
6 371 ms 3121 ms 2613 ms tbr2-p012701.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.194]
7 540 ms 530 ms 585 ms ggr2-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.37]
8 514 ms 569 ms 622 ms dcr1-so-3-3-0.Chicago.cw.net [208.175.10.93]
9 527 ms 539 ms 452 ms ahr1-pos-0-0.Oakbrookch1.cw.net [208.175.10.82]
10 756 ms 528 ms 528 ms csr1-ve240.Oakbrookch1.cw.net [216.33.64.10]
11 398 ms 394 ms 392 ms 64.37.227.157

Trace complete.

Now during the same hours, routing to the east coast (jersey) is fine:

Tracing route to 146.20.43.101 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 15 ms 12 ms 9 ms d53-1-230.try.wideopenwest.com [64.53.230.1]
3 18 ms 13 ms 14 ms 172.31.15.252
4 31 ms 31 ms 32 ms 12.119.51.181
5 49 ms 33 ms 36 ms gbr1-p51.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.208.130]
6 49 ms 48 ms 49 ms tbr2-p012502.phlpa.ip.att.net [12.122.3.5]
7 56 ms 45 ms 53 ms tbr1-p013601.phlpa.ip.att.net [12.122.9.165]
8 50 ms 56 ms 52 ms tbr2-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.97]
9 47 ms 50 ms 45 ms gar1-p390.nbwny.ip.att.net [12.123.219.166]
10 52 ms 49 ms 69 ms 12.119.14.14
11 53 ms 48 ms 52 ms border27.ge3-1-bbnet1.nyc.pnap.net [209.191.128.96]
12 54 ms 57 ms 60 ms choopa-1.border27.nyc.pnap.net [209.191.130.106]
13 50 ms 50 ms 48 ms 209.67.40.74
14 62 ms 55 ms 54 ms 146.20.43.101

Trace complete.

I'm a relatively new wow customer. Actually I had ComCast before, which ALWAYS had lousy pings/routing...

I've yet to deal with WOW support on anything like this. Question: Is it worth my time and effort to try support??
--
Have the courage to take your own thoughts seriously, for they will shape you.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5521807 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 20:10:49 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5521529 
Tracing route to w1.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.71.198]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
 
  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2    11 ms    11 ms    11 ms  d60-1-212.try.wideopenwest.com [65.60.212.1]
  3    10 ms    11 ms    10 ms  172.31.15.253
  4    12 ms    14 ms    12 ms  12.124.15.37
  5    16 ms    14 ms    15 ms  gbr2-p70.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.139.26]
  6    19 ms    19 ms    21 ms  tbr2-p013002.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.113]
  7    31 ms    23 ms    22 ms  ggr2-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.37]
  8    24 ms    21 ms    21 ms  so-1-1-0.edge1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.0.227.77]
  9    26 ms    27 ms    24 ms  so-7-0-0.mp1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.244.8.9]
 10    81 ms    84 ms    79 ms  so-3-0-0.mp1.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.1.129]
 11    81 ms    74 ms    77 ms  gige9-1.ipcolo3.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.2.73]
 12    76 ms    74 ms    68 ms  unknown.Level3.net [64.152.69.30]
 13    75 ms    71 ms    71 ms  w1.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.71.198]
 
Trace complete.

As you can see, just running the same trace as you I got vastly different results due to slightly different routing.

[text was edited by author 2003-01-02 19:52:54]
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5521529 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 19:49:16 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5521476 2 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms d53-1-224.try.wideopenwest.com [64.xx.xxx.xxx]
3 18 ms 16 ms 13 ms 172.31.15.252
4 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 12.119.51.181
5 315 ms 322 ms 313 ms gbr2-p51.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.208.134]
6 366 ms 338 ms 321 ms tbr2-p012701.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.194]
7 333 ms 297 ms 305 ms ggr2-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.37]
8 239 ms 273 ms 265 ms so-1-1-0.edge1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.0.227.77
]
9 322 ms 324 ms 295 ms so-7-0-0.mp1.Chicago1.Level3.net [209.244.8.9]
10 370 ms 382 ms 382 ms so-2-0-0.mp2.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.0.218]

11 470 ms 472 ms 482 ms gige10-1.ipcolo3.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.2.1
05]
12 431 ms 447 ms 486 ms unknown.Level3.net [64.152.69.30]
13 593 ms 566 ms 511 ms w1.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.71.198]

Trace complete.

WOW's routing isn't looking so good right now. Is the AT&T routers acting up again?
--
Fiber Optics is the future of high-speed internet access. Stop by the BBR Fiber Optic Forum.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5521476 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 19:43:45 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5519581 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5519581 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:04:11 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5516327
Tracing route to stu16.resnet1.depaul.edu [140.192.215.16]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 * * * Request timed out.
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 297 ms 73 ms 309 ms 172.30.171.97
4 122 ms 64 ms 23 ms 172.30.169.122
5 172 ms 55 ms 60 ms 172.30.170.61
6 68 ms 34 ms 97 ms 68.60.32.254
7 75 ms 278 ms 154 ms sl-gw33-chi-4-0.sprintlink.net [144.228.151.217]
8 107 ms 99 ms 54 ms sl-bb22-chi-4-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.21]
9 166 ms 43 ms 121 ms sl-st20-chi-14-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.84]
10 203 ms 326 ms 56 ms so-1-0-3.chcgil3-hcr1.bbnplanet.net [4.24.95.13]
11 296 ms 58 ms 270 ms so-4-0-0.chcgil2-br2.bbnplanet.net [4.0.1.186]
12 130 ms 339 ms 240 ms p1-0.chcgil2-cr2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.9.34]
13 64 ms 37 ms 289 ms p0-0.icnet.bbnplanet.net [4.24.203.66]
14 50 ms 142 ms 155 ms rtr-cst-bs-int2-a1-0.netequip.depaul.edu [206.22
0.243.169]
15 58 ms 326 ms 37 ms mfc-cst-bs-v865.netequip.depaul.edu [140.192.9.5
8]
16 28 ms 142 ms 348 ms mfc-sac-1s-a-v841.netequip.depaul.edu [140.192.5
.141]
17 94 ms 47 ms 79 ms stu16.resnet1.depaul.edu [140.192.215.16]

Trace complete.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5516327 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:17:04 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5511480 --
Hey everyone! I'm a WEB HOG!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5511480 Wed, 01 Jan 2003 22:26:11 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5511000 --
- Mathgod79 Earthlink/Covad/Ameritech (1500/384) Plymouth, MI]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5511000 Wed, 01 Jan 2003 21:40:07 EDT Re: I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5509622 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5509622 Wed, 01 Jan 2003 19:26:31 EDT I wish AT&T would get their act together... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5509500 

Tracing route to sac265-215-16.sac.depaul.edu [140.192.215.16]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
 
  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2    11 ms    11 ms    12 ms  d60-1-212.try.wideopenwest.com [65.60.212.1]
  3    11 ms    10 ms    13 ms  172.31.15.253
  4    18 ms    12 ms    14 ms  12.124.15.37
  5    25 ms    21 ms    24 ms  gbr2-p70.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.123.139.26]
  6     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  7    68 ms    65 ms    65 ms  ggr1-p3100.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.210]
  8    60 ms    59 ms    60 ms  p6-0.chcgil2-cr8.bbnplanet.net [4.24.224.53]
  9    60 ms    62 ms    61 ms  so-3-3-0.chcgil2-br2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.9.45]
 10    55 ms    51 ms    52 ms  p1-0.chcgil2-cr2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.9.34]
 11    62 ms    67 ms    70 ms  p0-0.icnet.bbnplanet.net [4.24.203.66]
 12    63 ms    63 ms    70 ms  rtr-cst-bs-int2-a1-0.netequip.depaul.edu [206.220.243.169]
 13    60 ms    63 ms    77 ms  mfc-cst-bs-a-v865.netequip.depaul.edu [140.192.9.58]
 14    60 ms    61 ms    63 ms  mfc-sac-1s-a-v841.netequip.depaul.edu [140.192.5.141]
 15    65 ms    65 ms    65 ms  sac265-215-16.sac.depaul.edu [140.192.215.16]

--
Hey everyone! I'm a WEB HOG!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/I-wish-ATT-would-get-their-act-together-5509500 Wed, 01 Jan 2003 19:13:06 EDT