<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Cable &#x26; Satellite TV&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6570996</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:08:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:08:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6588854</link>
<description><![CDATA[PaulHikeS2 posted : I've yet to hear anyone who opposes HDTV. Unfortunately, it hasn't taken off yet because the price is way too steep for the average consumer...I'm seeing about $650 for absolute bottom of the line 27" sets with no tuner. In the current economic climate they are beyond the reach of a prudent consumer. With time, that obviously will change, as lower prices for the hardware will fuel demand for more programming. I'm certainly looking forward to that day!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6588854</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:22:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6586919</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kickroot posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/641190" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=641190');">imrf</a>:</SMALL><HR>it was really meant for you in general.it was aimed at everybody who is opposing the HDTV take-off. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Ahh..well I've got no problem with HD, just the TV part =)<BR><BR><br><small>--<br>-In a bad mood since 1824</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6586919</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6586888</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : it was really meant for you in general.it was aimed at everybody who is opposing the HDTV take-off.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6586888</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:58:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6586755</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kickroot posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/641190" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=641190');">imrf</a>:</SMALL><HR>if people dont like the price of HDTVs right now fine dont but they, but dont piss on the shoes of the people who do buy the TVs and want the service. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I don't believe I was pissing on anything.  I just think there's no TV on this planet I would spend a grand on.<BR><BR><br><small>--<br>-In a bad mood since 1824</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6586755</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:45:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6583829</link>
<description><![CDATA[r0bErT4u posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by Interactive TV &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.media-visions.com/itv-cablehdtv.html" >www.media-visions.com/it &middot;&middot;&middot; dtv.html</A> :</SMALL><HR>Cable Prepares<br>to Carry HDTV<br>by Ken Freed.<br>.<br>The difference is VSB or QAM, and the fact cable must carry digital ATSC broadcasts.<br>  <br>The national broadcast networks are initiating ATSC feeds as a growing list of local broadcasters start transmitting high-definition TV (HDTV) or multiplex standard-definition digital TV (SDTV). Is cable ready to deliver broadcast digital channels to cable customers?<br><br>When it comes to HDTV, said Bill Wall, technical director of subscriber networks for Scientific-Atlanta. The critical difference between cable and terrestrial broadcast is signal modulation.<br><br>Cable uses 256 QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation) to form the digital bitstream in the cable. Broadcast HDTV uses 8VSB (vestigial side band) to form the waves in the air. Each method works perfectly for its transmission environment (e.g., error correction), but the two modulation schemes are incompatible.<br><br>"It's been a real issue inside cable on how to handle the HDTV situation." he said. Neither broadcasters are not about to alter their infrastructure for cable. To deliver HDTV content, therefore, cable must either pass through the VSB signal or else convert it to QAM. <br><br><STRONG>Converting VSB to QAM makes the most sense for cable, said Denton Kanouff, marketing VP for digital network systems at General Instrument, noting that GI also builds transcoders for broadcasters. If the VSB is passed through untouched, the HDTV content cannot easily be merged into the electronic program guide (EPG), which might churn out the cable customers with HDTV sets. <br><br>That's the risk being taken by Time-Warner Cable in Manhattan, "To satisfy early consumer demand," said Wall, "they signed a deal with CBS to carry a daily HD news feed at 8VSB over cable. The pass-though is not efficient, but it works. They only have a few hundred customers with digital sets, but it may help keep them customers."</STRONG><br><br>In support of the alternative solution, Wall said, "S-A is now building a special Explorer 2000 set-top with full HDTV decoding." Converting VSB to QAM at the headend [S-A builds the converters], the QAM is returned to VSB in the box. He explained, "We figure the people who do have HDTV sets today can afford to get a special box designed for them. We're shipping the device now." <br><br>General Instrument introduced an HDTV solution for cable at the 1998 NCTA show, said Kanouff, noting that the DTC-5000-plus integrates HDTV decoding into the box. GI also can sell VSB to QAM transcoders to any interested broadcasters. <br><br>A source at AT&T Broadband said that GI is "very close" to completing a customized HDTV version of the DTC-5000+ with a Apples' 1394 "firewire" interface for deployment on the former TCI cable systems "within a year." <br><br>Today's expensive digital TV sets need a digital set-top box with a QAM modulator inside to receive HDTV signals through the cable rather than off-air. Essentially, this means a cable modem with a robust graphics chip. The second generation of HDTV sets, he said, will not only be more affordable, but the sets will be cable-ready. <br><br>"This first generation of HDTV sets now in the stores," said Wall, "are designed only for terrestrial broadcast reception. The goal is to get QAM converters built into cable-ready HDTV. Therefore, NCTA and SCTE (Society of Cable Television Engineers) are talking with CEMA (Consumer Electronics Manufacturers Association). <br><br>For the time being, he said, "a special HDTV set-top seems to be the direction most of the MSOs are going to supply HD content to those with digital TV sets." He's not willing to make any predictions.<br><br>"The main thing," Wall said, "is that HDTV works today on a number of cable systems. Nationally, he noted. HBO signed a deal to carry an HDTV feed from Viacom, and similar deals are happening among all the big players, including HITS. "I think cable wants to sign up as much HD footage as it can get."<br><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6583829</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:04:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6583660</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : they wont do 8VSB because their network is a QAM based network and they arent going to change it over just for the convienence of a few subs.why would it help keep customers,the only people it would make happy is the people who bought their own OTA box,but then they would be getting the signal for free.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6583660</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:42:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6583636</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : nope, not at all, I personally care about the quality of the video that I will be watching. I would rather have a nice clean picture rather than a grainy one that you would get the that crappy $200 25" TV and also it would be 2 times the size.hey if people dont like the price of HDTVs right now fine dont but they, but dont piss on the shoes of the people who do buy the TVs and want the service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6583636</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:39:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6583452</link>
<description><![CDATA[r0bErT4u posted : Thanks for excreting that HDTV is too expensive for most people <I>*DUH! ROLLING MY EYES*</I>, but the many Cable TV subscribers want more High-Definition channels.  Is Comcast going to add more HDTV channels in the very near future?  Why doesn't Comcast pass-through the HD feeds at 8VSB over the cable, and help keep their subscribers?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6583452</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:12:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6582474</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kickroot posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/641190" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=641190');">imrf</a>:</SMALL><HR>they arent all that expensive.my 47" Panasonic only cost me $1300 in August of 2001, now i can get it for $900. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>And you don't think that's way to expensive for something as stupid as a TV?  I can buy a 25" TV for $200.  That leaves me an extra $700 for something that I actually care about.<BR><BR><br><small>--<br>-In a bad mood since 1824</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6582474</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:34:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581667</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : i buy my equipment from normal home theater shops, not from Best Buy and the like , they like to inflate their prices a lot.even oncall.com has good deals on tvs even with freight shipping.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581667</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:26:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581470</link>
<description><![CDATA[r0bErT4u posted : HINT:  Buy your HDTV after the SuperBowl Party Returns.  I purchased my 42" Plasma Screen for a steal :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581470</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:47:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581428</link>
<description><![CDATA[PaulHikeS2 posted : It's a lot of money for a maximum of 8 channels of programming, especially when they already receive those channels on their regular tv. Granted the picture is spectacular, but HDTV is luxury that most people cannot justify.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581428</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:40:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581362</link>
<description><![CDATA[mikedz4 posted : where are you getting your tv's at? big screen tv's run about $1500 with the tuner built in $1300 without at best buy and circuit city.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581362</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:32:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581354</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : they arent all that expensive.my 47" Panasonic only cost me $1300 in August of 2001, now i can get it for $900.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581354</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:30:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581326</link>
<description><![CDATA[Descent posted : HDTV's are expensive... is it really a wonder they didn't take off?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581326</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:28:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581223</link>
<description><![CDATA[mikedz4 posted : digital and hd are the same thing right?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6581223</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:15:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580985</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : actually the FCC mandated all stations to go digital and to stop analog not HD,they are two different things.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580985</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:47:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580757</link>
<description><![CDATA[mikedz4 posted : no we'll get the hdtv channels but we'll be paying much more for them. I can't wait 3 years to see what the price will be for cable when they have to broadcast in digital. there will be no basic package for $40 instead the basic package will be digital basic for $70.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580757</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:22:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580646</link>
<description><![CDATA[panth1 posted : The FCC mandated the broadcast stations to start broadcasting an HD signal or digital for the FAUX network.<br><br>I don't think there is any mandate for satellite channels to broadcast in HD now.<br><br>Problem is that these networks keep raising their fee per sub because they can.... and is pissing off the cable companies who need the price increases for their pockets.<br><br>Also cable companies don't want to have to purchase expensive HD receivers, encoders, and new set top boxes<br><br>In the end.. the customer is screwed again.<br><small>--<br>Total Modems On This Upstream Channel : 485 (457 active)<BR>Avg upstream channel utilization : 98%<BR></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580646</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:11:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580644</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : because there are more cable subscribers that sat,plus that is who they decided to interview.look im not going to argue my point with you, i gave facts from a source if you dont like them then just move on.<br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-04-15 23:11:18]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580644</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:11:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580502</link>
<description><![CDATA[PaulHikeS2 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/799167" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=799167');">mikedz4</a>:</SMALL><HR>i think he means television stations like local stations (abc,nbc,cbs,pbs,fox) <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>I thought of that, but that would mean he was making a poor argument, and I didn't want to make that assumption...I'd rather assume that I didn't understand him, and let him clarify. And why are cable companies singled out? Satellite providers carry even less HD content then cable, at least in my area.<br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-04-15 22:59:14]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580502</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:55:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580453</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : well, there are more than just local channels.i was just stating what was in the USA Today.and yes 1 feed usually means 1 channel.just because you dont get them does NOT mean that they done exist, since the cable companies refuse to pay for them.If i can find the article i will scan it and post it for you so that you can read it for yourself.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580453</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:51:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580354</link>
<description><![CDATA[mikedz4 posted : i think he means television stations like local stations (abc,nbc,cbs,pbs,fox)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580354</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:38:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580295</link>
<description><![CDATA[PaulHikeS2 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/641190" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=641190');">imrf</a>:</SMALL><HR>And this is the exact reason why HDTV is not taking off as fast as analysts had hoped for.The lame cable companies say that there are not enough feeds which is a lie and they also whine about the costs of carrying the feeds.USA Today had an article the other day about this exact issue,and it said that there are about 880 HDTV feeds being sent in the US right now out of a total of 1300 feeds, so that complaint that there are not enough is bull.But for you its only a guessing game on when you will get more.If you are in an ex-ATT area you might be waiting a while. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>What do you mean by a feed? I don't know what a feed is. If you mean channels, well, we can count the national cable channels with HD availability on one hand. HBO, Showtime, Discovery, ESPN, and I guess you could say HDnet which is satellite only. That's 5. F I V E. (There may be a couple more...someone correct me if I'm wrong.) Where in God's name do you get 880? Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by a feed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6580295</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:32:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6571862</link>
<description><![CDATA[mikedz4 posted : the main reason hdtv isn't taking off is because of the price. You have to pay $700+ for a hdtv these days. Sure it's cheaper than before but it's still too expensive for most people. I won't get a hdtv until i get myself another credit card later this year or it may be longer cause i can't fit anthing bigger than 25" in my entertainment center.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6571862</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 00:10:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6571474</link>
<description><![CDATA[imrf posted : And this is the exact reason why HDTV is not taking off as fast as analysts had hoped for.The lame cable companies say that there are not enough feeds which is a lie and they also whine about the costs of carrying the feeds.USA Today had an article the other day about this exact issue,and it said that there are about 880 HDTV feeds being sent in the US right now out of a total of 1300 feeds, so that complaint that there are not enough is bull.But for you its only a guessing game on when you will get more.If you are in an ex-ATT area you might be waiting a while.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6571474</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:25:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[HDTV] Comcast Prez says that they may not carry ESPN HD?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6570996</link>
<description><![CDATA[r0bErT4u posted : <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.hdtvpub.com/local/viewReports.cfm/zipcode_98188/dma_819/cableco_1/" >www.hdtvpub.com/local/vi &middot;&middot;&middot; bleco_1/</A> :</SMALL><HR>"... Title: ESPN HD?<br><br>I stumbled across another HDTV forum on the web. One of the threads was related to ESPN HD on Comcast. The thread contained an email that is supposedly from Comcast's President indicating that they will not carry ESPN HD because the carrying fees are too high. You can check out the thread at: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.espnhd.com/voice/showthread.php?s=da27e94c185720b911ae502b236db383&threadid=4058" >www.espnhd.com/voice/sho &middot;&middot;&middot; did=4058</A>. <br><br>I obviously have no way of verifying the authenticity of the posting. If true, it is very disappointing, not just for the lack of programming but because Comcast appears (once again) to be giving us wildly inaccurate info when we call customer service. ..."<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.espnhd.com/voice/showthread.php?s=da27e94c185720b911ae502b236db383&threadid=4058" >www.espnhd.com/voice/sho &middot;&middot;&middot; did=4058</A> :</SMALL><HR>"... As you may have seen in one of my previous posts, I'm a bit disturbed my Comcast's decision to not pay and carry ESPN HD. I was able to get Comcast President Steve Burke's email address and sent him the email below, to which he gave the following informationless reply. I will admit that I was impressed that he took the time to answer me first thing in the morning, even if he said nothing.<br><br>Please forgive me for forgetting to remove his email address from this. Afterall, I would HATE to see a few hundred people email him regarding this subject. That would be a REAL SHAME! No, really, you shouldn't. I'm not kidding. ..."  more in the thread.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>-------------<br><STRONG>Does anyone know when the greater Seattle, WA area is going to get more than the current (2)High Definition Channels (ie. Local HDTV Channels) and/or additional High Definition Channels we won't be getting (ie. ESPN HD)?</STRONG><br><br><br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-04-14 22:50:57]</i>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/HDTV-Comcast-Prez-says-that-they-may-not-carry-ESPN-HD-6570996</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:34:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
