<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: RIAA is mighty&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7057674</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:10:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:10:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7318241</link>
<description><![CDATA[stateq2 posted : no, this does not justify it, but it gives a good explanation why people do it.  itunes is a step in the right direction, considering how broad the use of the internet for everday resources is going to be in the near future.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7318241</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2003 14:21:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7298583</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/791487" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=791487');">stateq2</a>:</SMALL><HR>I think people would rather download individual songs that they like, instead of buying a whole cd for a couple of songs.  Before internet, people would be forced to buy either singles or an entire album.  Napster was invented to counter this.  The itunes program is a very good idea, but the price should be cut in half. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Oh, I have no doubt that's what people want, but that doesn't justify free downloading, if that's what you're suggesting.  They would be smart to move the business plan.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7298583</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2003 04:53:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7296580</link>
<description><![CDATA[DemonicProf posted : Are you Jewish?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7296580</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 22:34:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7282869</link>
<description><![CDATA[stateq2 posted : I think people would rather download individual songs that they like, instead of buying a whole cd for a couple of songs.  Before internet, people would be forced to buy either singles or an entire album.  Napster was invented to counter this.  The itunes program is a very good idea, but the price should be cut in half.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7282869</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:55:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7256173</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/801536" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=801536');">BiG_Lou</a>:</SMALL><HR> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/684591" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=684591');">AmeritecTech</a>:</SMALL><HR>The RIAA doesn't control the music industry.  The music industry controls the RIAA. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>The music industry I speak of is the people buying the CD...not the record labels/groups/corporations, etc, in case you interpreted it differently. In any case, the RIAA *does* control those who buy their CD's. We all know that the majority of music-listeners support P2P and *hate* the RIAA. We all wish for lower CD prices, etc, but what have we to show for it? Kids being sued for creating and using P2P programs. So how are we controlling the RIAA?<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>The RIAA exists because piracy exists.  If everyone just bought CD's instead of using P2P, there would be little need for an RIAA.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7256173</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2003 16:35:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7250090</link>
<description><![CDATA[BiG_Lou posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/684591" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=684591');">AmeritecTech</a>:</SMALL><HR>The RIAA doesn't control the music industry.  The music industry controls the RIAA. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>The music industry I speak of is the people buying the CD...not the record labels/groups/corporations, etc, in case you interpreted it differently. In any case, the RIAA *does* control those who buy their CD's. We all know that the majority of music-listeners support P2P and *hate* the RIAA. We all wish for lower CD prices, etc, but what have we to show for it? Kids being sued for creating and using P2P programs. So how are we controlling the RIAA?<br><small>--<br>Intel 2.4C -Abit IS7 -Corsair XMS 3200 (512 x 2) -WD 80GB 7200 RPM 8MB cache -Lite-on 48x24x48x16 CDRW/DVD -Antec Plus 1080AMG + 430 TRUE PSU -Stock HSF, Tornado and 3300 RPM case fans</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7250090</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 22:40:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7225988</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted : More silly justification.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7225988</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:47:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7225815</link>
<description><![CDATA[bobmanh2o posted : LOL good thing I just download and dont share :) Theres millions and millions, of people who download music online, i d/l music all the time, but do i sell it to my friend next door? Doi mass copy it and give it to my friends? No i put it in my mp3 player and listen to myself, no one looses money off of me, because if i had to buy the music, i wouldnt. The only reason i download the music is because it was free, if there was no kazaa i would say screw it and not buy music and waste my money on the garbage. I wont nor never give my money to over rated people that make millions off of us americans. Am i a criminal because i downloaded a song? I dont share the music and never will. The riaa is going after the big time sharing folks, i dont think it is right, i dont see how you are doing wrong. Where it is wrong is if you sell it and reproduce it for your benifit. Me downloading john denver country boy isnt going to hurt a person in the world. Why dont these people spend more time (the gov) worring about real criminals people that steal, kill, destroy, drug dealers, not some 33 year old man downloading john denver.. This world is getting ridiculous and it makes me sick. They have no right to peoples identity or information. The whole sending messages to people on kazaa is funny and a different story, i agree with the post above this will be a paper battle and go on for a good long time, so people keep sharing :)..<br><small>--<br>Bob |G4R 970| DirecWay [DRS] Family Surfer| Host: Win XP Pro P4-1.8gHz, 512MB DDR 120gig HD| RWIN 24228| Proxy ON Port 83 | No AFD Tweak</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7225815</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:33:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7132490</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted : The RIAA doesn't control the music industry.  The music industry controls the RIAA.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7132490</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:28:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7132086</link>
<description><![CDATA[BiG_Lou posted : I think that, if more and more people get access to high speed connections, we will start seeing more groups leaving their record labels. They can make more money selling their music for $5 bucks online than they would if they stuck with a label. Plus the RIAA basically controls the music industry. They charge whatever they want, and if we don't like it, we either have to live without music of download it. Once we start to DL, they sue us. Sound fun]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7132086</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:24:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7106269</link>
<description><![CDATA[Naiirita posted : &raquo;<A HREF="http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20020428" >ars.userfriendly.org/car &middot;&middot;&middot; 20020428</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7106269</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:30:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7106257</link>
<description><![CDATA[gigahurtz posted : Here's an idea, DONT BUY ANYMORE CDS! Boycott the RIAA. Download everything ! :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7106257</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:29:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7096102</link>
<description><![CDATA[Naiirita posted : im a bit hazy...but i think the ones they couldnt buy out, they magaed to close with some kind of zoning law? this happned a while back during our last recession when cd sales dropped then also....the studios begain to losse money and so went after the small fish.<br><small>--<br>their are no stupid questions, just inquisitive idiots</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7096102</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:36:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7095947</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted : What pretense?  If they're not breaking the law, they should have nothing to worry about.  Many rap artists cut their own CD's, as well as many other artists.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7095947</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:21:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7095899</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jehu posted : They must have been doing something illegal then. I am familiar with a ton of "independant" artists who make their living just fine without the big leagues.<br><br>Consider Aimee Mann, who continues to be extremely succesful without major label backing.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.aimeemann.com/" >www.aimeemann.com/</A><br><small>--<br>Death is nature's way of saying "Howdy".</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7095899</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:16:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7095877</link>
<description><![CDATA[Naiirita posted : they tried that in california. a few local artist started using small cheap homebased tech. like mass cd burners u can get for a few thousand dollars,a nd made their own cds. the RIAA and the local "big studios" had them ALL shut down under one pretense or another.<br><small>--<br>their are no stupid questions, just inquisitive idiots</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7095877</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:13:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7093771</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jehu posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/684591" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=684591');">AmeritecTech</a>:</SMALL><HR>There is another alternative, CenTex.  The artists could open a studio and cut the CD themselves.  Too expensive?  Need someone else's cash investment?  EXACTLY.  If you want someone else's money and studio, you have to play by their rules. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>YES! or flip hamburgers like the rest of us and fund it yourself.<br><small>--<br>Death is nature's way of saying "Howdy".</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7093771</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:27:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7092993</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted : There is another alternative, CenTex.  The artists could open a studio and cut the CD themselves.  Too expensive?  Need someone else's cash investment?  EXACTLY.  If you want someone else's money and studio, you have to play by their rules.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7092993</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:09:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7091164</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jehu posted : oh, boo hoo. You forgot the part about the "Artist" having a gun held to his head when he signed a crappy contract.<br><br>If you willingly make a deal with the devil, and want to cry foul later, my sympathy is gone.<br><small>--<br>Death is nature's way of saying "Howdy".</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7091164</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 08:29:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7090239</link>
<description><![CDATA[CenTex2 posted : here's a little interesting info on the whole RIAA vs. everyone deal.  An interesting read...i don't feel sorry for the RIAA bastards in ANY way.  Get a real job!  I'll gladly send the ARTISTS money for their work, gimme an address....seeing how the industry gang-rapes everyone (artists included), i don't feel the "need" to buy crap from the record companies.  The music industry is indeed collapsing, but not due to file sharing...listen to the radio lately?  It's ALL UTTER CRAP.  <br><br>A music industry case study <br><br>A look at a mythical rock band's earnings, with actual figures compiled from industry sources: <br>New York City's hottest new band is Grunthead, a four-piece hard rock group from Maspeth. Because they've got buzz, the band gets a 15% royalty rate, a few points above the usual amount for a new artist. <br>Its debut, "Gruntastic," goes gold &#150; only 128 of more than 30,000 records reached that level in 2002. <br>The Gold Record Gross: 500,000 albums sell at $16.98 = $8,490,000 The Grunts' royalty is 15% of retail. That's $1,273,500. <br>But the Contract calls for "packaging deductions" of 25%, so the gross drops to $6,367,500. Then there's promotional albums and giveaways the labels give to wholesalers, retailers, radio and the press. That's a "free goods" charge of 15%, so the gross drops another to $5,094,000. So, the band's royalty is actually: $764,100. The record company keeps the packaging and "free goods" funds. After collecting a $9.99 wholesale price, it also reaps an additional $829,900. The $3,500,000 balance goes to retailers, assuming they sell the record for list price. <br>Because the band was hot, they got an advance from the record company of $300,000. They spent $200,000 of that recording the album, which included a $50,000 advance to the producer. They pocketed the remaining $100,000. Additionally, the label spent $100,000 making the band's first video, which got them played on MTV2. The band owes all of this money back to the label. <br>So the royalty drops to $364,100. <br>But the band's producer also earned a 4% royalty of $203,760, of which he already received $50,000. So the band has to pay him an additional $153,760, reducing their royalty to $210,340. <br>After pocketing $310,340 (which includes the remaining $100,000 of the advance), the band has to pay their manager 15%, or $46,551, and give 2% of the total deal, or $101,880, to the power lawyer who got them the deal in the first place. That takes the band down to $161,909. <br>That's not bad money, but it's split four ways, or $40,477.25 each, about the same as a city sanitation worker with two years' experience, without health benefits, vacation and retirement fund. But with, of course, groupies. <br><br>Originally published on February 19, 2003 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7090239</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 02:24:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7087158</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted : Verizon probably does not keep a list of the sites you visit.  The records come from the RIAA, who allegedly determined that certain IP addresses were sharing music at a certain time.  The only records Verizon provides is who was using what IP address at what time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7087158</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:18:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7086986</link>
<description><![CDATA[godsmack posted : The sad truth is with the internet there is no privacy.....<br>That is as long as the ISP's keep a record of all the sites you visit.......If Verizon didn't keep a list of the sites and your IP address on record then there would be no problem.......................................]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7086986</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:00:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7082890</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jehu posted : OCSVirus, you should register with dslreports...it will edumacate you ;)<br><small>--<br>Death is nature's way of saying "Howdy".</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7082890</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:35:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7082785</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by OCSVirus:</SMALL><HR>I hope Verizon wins music should be free in the first place, the only reason RIAA should get paid for it is because they provide the CD to put the music on, if we download on our computers then they provided nothing and should get paid accordingly. it is like water bills, the only reason they get paid is because they have the pippes that they payed for, and we use if you went to a river for all of your water you "should" be able to stop paying the water bill. Not that im saying go to the river and get a drink LoL. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>That is the stupidest anti-RIAA argument I've ever heard.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7082785</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:23:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7082545</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jehu posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by OCSVirus:</SMALL><HR>I hope Verizon wins music should be free in the first place, the only reason RIAA should get paid for it is because they provide the CD to put the music on, if we download on our computers then they provided nothing and should get paid accordingly. it is like water bills, the only reason they get paid is because they have the pippes that they payed for, and we use if you went to a river for all of your water you "should" be able to stop paying the water bill. Not that im saying go to the river and get a drink LoL. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>umm.. the RIAA has nothing to do with the production of music or CDS. <br><small>--<br>Death is nature's way of saying "Howdy".</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7082545</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:50:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7082521</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I hope Verizon wins music should be free in the first place, the only reason RIAA should get paid for it is because they provide the CD to put the music on, if we download on our computers then they provided nothing and should get paid accordingly. it is like water bills, the only reason they get paid is because they have the pippes that they payed for, and we use if you went to a river for all of your water you "should" be able to stop paying the water bill. Not that im saying go to the river and get a drink LoL.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7082521</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:47:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7081103</link>
<description><![CDATA[Urzumph posted : it wasn't just DOS, it was trojans, virii, system crashing p2p exploits.... lots of nasty stuff.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7081103</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:43:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7065321</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/688023" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=688023');">Jehu</a>:</SMALL><HR><I>except that the RIAA has petitioned the government to be allowed to use normally illegal methods, including hackers hired to attack peer to peer networks. </I><br><br>i don't see why it would be illegal for RIAA scouts to scour p2p networks looking for infringers, but I trust the courts will sort that out.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>That's not what I'm referring to.  I'm talking about hackers hired to take down p2p networks using Denial of Service attacks and other normally illegal methods.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7065321</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2003 14:58:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7065277</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jehu posted : <I>except that the RIAA has petitioned the government to be allowed to use normally illegal methods, including hackers hired to attack peer to peer networks. </I><br><br>i don't see why it would be illegal for RIAA scouts to scour p2p networks looking for infringers, but I trust the courts will sort that out.<br><small>--<br>Death is nature's way of saying "Howdy".</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7065277</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2003 14:50:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7063775</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted : It was actually Franklin, and he said "Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither."  I'm not sure how it applies to copyright protection, though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7063775</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2003 11:33:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7062892</link>
<description><![CDATA[mlink1 posted : Not a perfect quote but; Jefferson covered it years ago:<br>"Those who would surrender their freedoms for security- deserve neither".  We already have.  RIAA is not powerful: we, the people, have become weak.  Fisrst there was the "Fatherland", then the "Motherland", now, we have the "Homeland".  Anybody out there getting nervous about History- past, present and........??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7062892</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2003 08:02:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7058669</link>
<description><![CDATA[AmeritecTech posted : You would have a strong argument, except that the RIAA has petitioned the government to be allowed to use normally illegal methods, including hackers hired to attack peer to peer networks.  Is it any surprise that this was followed by the RIAA's website being hacked twice?<br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-06-07 17:31:27]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RIAA-is-mighty-7058669</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2003 17:28:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RIAA is mighty</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RIAA-is-mighty-7057674</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jehu posted : RIAA will win. RIAA will always win in matters related to the internet and copyright infringement.<br><br>It's beautiful. I truly hope they bring legal action against those names they find to be engaging in infringing activites.<br><br>Law is law. Flame away!<br><small>--<br>Death is nature's way of saying "Howdy".</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RIAA-is-mighty-7057674</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2003 15:30:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
