jvmorrisI Am The Man Who Was Not There. MVM join:2001-04-03 Reston, VA 1 edit |
to Randy Bell
Re: A note to Symantec RepsIt seems that the top people are from IBM (and fairly recently); that explains just about everything -- at least as far as I am concerned. |
|
SparrowCrystal Sky Premium Member join:2002-12-03 Sachakhand ·RCN
|
to JTM1051
Contact Symantec Corporate Headquarterssaid by JTM1051: Crystal,
Any replies from Symantec yet?
Calls that I made to Symantec HQs have been returned in a timely manner. However, it should be noted that I am only questioning the difficulty end-users encounter when attempting to reach tech support for quick, and user-friendly solutions to their problems. Large corporations such as Symantec can not reasonably be expected to make changes overnight, but a little diplomacy can go a long way. Since I have not encountered the usual array of problems end-users in this forum have experienced, I can afford a diplomatic approach. Symantec Global Headquarters |
|
Mele20 Premium Member join:2001-06-05 Hilo, HI |
to Sparrow
Re: A note to Symantec RepsYeah...guess we should all invest. Looks like folks here who are having so many problems with Symantec products that they are considering leaving them or have already done so are a small minority of users. Business Booms At Symantec Jan. 21, 2004 "But it was the company's consumer software that grew the most--55% year over year. Symantec's consumer sales represent 49% of the company's total revenue". » www.informationweek.com/ ··· 17500470 |
|
SparrowCrystal Sky Premium Member join:2002-12-03 Sachakhand ·RCN
|
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Jan-23 2:32 pm
LU 2.0 Mystery SolvedInformation for customers who have downloaded LiveUpdate 2.0Automatic LiveUpdate may be disabled after updating to LiveUpdate 2.0 Situation:When users of Symantec's Windows-based consumer products run LiveUpdate manually to install LiveUpdate 2.0 and then do not restart their system upon completion of the installation, the product's Automatic LiveUpdate component is disabled. Document ID:2004012113234513 Last Modified:01/22/2004 -- Security Forum FAQs...-......-... Starfire "5 in 4" |
|
jvmorrisI Am The Man Who Was Not There. MVM join:2001-04-03 Reston, VA |
to Mele20
Re: A note to Symantec Repssaid by Mele20: . . . . Looks like folks here who are having so many problems with Symantec products that they are considering leaving them or have already done so are a small minority of users.
That statement, of course, begs the issue of how many NAV/NIS/NPF users actually know whether they have a problem or not. When my NAV went down sometime in the last two weeks there was absolutely nothing that made it obvious that the product was no longer working. System scans and e-mail scans were still nominally functional -- but, in reality -- absolutely no scans were being made. And that was the same problem that I encountered with NIS 2002 -- the firewall quit working but there was absolutely no indication of this fact that the average end-user would be likely to pick up on.Indeed, part of my concern (and I'm a long-time NAV/NIS/NSW user) is precisely related to this issue -- when the product becomes non-functional, there is absolutely no readily observable indication of this fact. I only found out because I knew what to look for -- but even I don't do it every 4 hours. quote: Business Booms At Symantec Jan. 21, 2004 "But it was the company's consumer software that grew the most--55% year over year. Symantec's consumer sales represent 49% of the company's total revenue".
I've already addressed just how that happened in a thread over in the Security Forum. |
|
SparrowCrystal Sky Premium Member join:2002-12-03 Sachakhand ·RCN
|
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Jan-24 2:37 pm
Symantec Updated Thread List |
|
StraitShootWho Loves Ya Baby? - Theo Kojak Premium Member join:2003-02-08 Clinton, MA |
to jvmorris
Re: A note to Symantec Repssaid by jvmorris: That statement, of course, begs the issue of how many NAV/NIS/NPF users actually know whether they have a problem or not. When my NAV went down sometime in the last two weeks there was absolutely nothing that made it obvious that the product was no longer working. System scans and e-mail scans were still nominally functional -- but, in reality -- absolutely no scans were being made. And that was the same problem that I encountered with NIS 2002 -- the firewall quit working but there was absolutely no indication of this fact that the average end-user would be likely to pick up on.
Well, how's this for a confirmation you're right, J.V... ? I just ran a scan using AVG on a computer that had NAV 2003, that looked updated, (I personally checked it, and YES, of course i know what I am doing...LOL) and it looked like auto protect was on.. So... I uninstall NAV Off a friend's computer, I install Avast! and ...what do you know? The computer is infected with the blaster worm... I ran an online scan with Panda that confirmed it...so I let Avast do it's job... That's too bad... really.. How can I defend NAV if this happened.. The def's were current and the subscription renewed..I will tell my co worker to contact Symantec, but what's the point...... I am at a loss for words... I also have to say that I looked at the quarantee log, she had the last virus on her system quaranteed about 1 month ago.. Somewhere after that I GUESS, and I only guess, NAV wasn't working.. The only thing I should have done, mind you, was test the AV for detection, using eicar, but I forgot and was in a hurry... |
|
jvmorrisI Am The Man Who Was Not There. MVM join:2001-04-03 Reston, VA |
said by StraitShoot: . . . Well, how's this for a confirmation you're right, J.V... ? I just ran a scan using AVG on a computer that had NAV 2003, that looked updated, (I personally checked it, and YES, of course i know what I am doing...LOL) and it looked like auto protect was on.. So... I uninstall NAV Off a friend's computer, I install Avast! and ...what do you know? The computer is infected with the blaster worm... I ran an online scan with Panda that confirmed it...so I let Avast do it's job...
That's too bad... really.. How can I defend NAV if this happened.. Somewhere after that I GUESS, and I only guess, NAV wasn't working..
This may seem a rather odd response, Jim, but I really wish someone would tell me I'd screwed up when I made that comment! (Well, presumably someone who knew what they were talking about.) Scary, isn't it? |
|
SparrowCrystal Sky Premium Member join:2002-12-03 Sachakhand ·RCN
|
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Jan-27 9:37 pm
Re: Symantec Updated Thread List |
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Feb-4 11:31 pm
Feb. 4 Update (1) |
|
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Feb-4 11:32 pm
Feb. 4 Update (2) |
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Feb-9 11:08 pm
Feb. 9, 2004 (thread update) |
|
Sparrow 1 edit |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Feb-15 12:04 am
Feb. 15, 2004 Updated threads |
|
Sparrow 2 edits |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Feb-17 3:26 am
Unable to update NAV definitions via LU, try this! |
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Feb-24 1:52 am
Re: Feb. 24, 2004 Updated threads |
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Feb-29 5:58 pm
February 29, 2004 Updated threads |
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Mar-1 4:50 am
March 1, 2004 Updated threads |
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Mar-2 7:48 pm
Auto Live Update problems with NAV - use this FIXThere are a number of threads in the Users Security Forum complaining about NAV not updating properly (no news here). This thread is where the FIX was first posted: » LiveUpdate for NAV2002 problem fixedIn the last 24 hours, I have received four automatic Live Updates from Symantec. After each update is complete go into: C:\Program Files\Common Files\Symantec Shared\VirusDefs >> and DELETE the BinHub folder. This is NOT how it should be working, but until Symantec comes up with something better, this simple FIX does in fact work. Yes, it's an annoyance to have to delete a folder after each subsequent update, but the way the definitions have been coming in one after another, it may be a wise thing to do. Symantec Global Headquarters |
|
|
your moderator at work
hidden : hidden :
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Mar-7 12:40 am
March 7, 2004 Updated threads |
|
Kiwi Premium Member join:2003-05-26 Bryant, AR |
to Sparrow
Re: A note to Symantec RepsI was staunch supporter of Norton, bought the very first product out the door (Canadian) as well. Often people ask what software to buy, I now tell people to avoid Symantec-Norton products; now I'm in the Biz of training, support and software/hardware evaluations and can safely state that Norton has lost at least 180 sales in the last two months!
The product has become retrograde with updates, removing rather than improving functionality. To date the only aspect of Norton that has any value is Ghost. |
|
StraitShootWho Loves Ya Baby? - Theo Kojak Premium Member join:2003-02-08 Clinton, MA 1 edit |
said by Kiwi: I was staunch supporter of Norton, bought the very first product out the door (Canadian) as well. Often people ask what software to buy, I now tell people to avoid Symantec-Norton products; now I'm in the Biz of training, support and software/hardware evaluations and can safely state that Norton has lost at least 180 sales in the last two months!
The product has become retrograde with updates, removing rather than improving functionality. To date the only aspect of Norton that has any value is Ghost.
I have returned to being vehemetly Anti Norton.. It seems like everytime I try to trust this company they go out of their way to make me distrust and dislike them, LOL.. A Large Number of problems with computers in the office were with Liveupdate, and conflicts, most of them being Norton conflicting with itself... (no kidding).. Maybe THAT's the best way to unseat #1., a small, growing number of "Norton Rebels", quietly going about their daily tasks, teaching others that "Yes, Virginia, there really are other Antivirus Products out there..".. LOL... |
|
84.2 8.2
·TekSavvy Cable
·Can Com
|
Glen T
Member
2004-Mar-9 9:55 pm
In the past two weeks I've upgraded 4 computers from NAV 2002 because they had started randomly crashing at boot time -- NAVAPW32 caused an exception in KERNEL32. This started happening after a recent LiveUpdate. It is intermittent, but occured regularly on 4 Win9x machines.
I threw away a total of 13 months paid-up virus definition updates in the process.
Since NAV 2002 is no longer supported, there won't be any fixes for this. It is interesting that this started occurring about the same time as Symantec started advising customers that these systems had "CRITICAL ISSUES" and that we should upgrade to the latest NAV 2004.
Yet, as far as I know, Symantec is still selling virus defintion subscription renewals for NAV 2002... Hmmm....
One of those machines is now testing AVG. We'll see how that goes... |
|
SparrowCrystal Sky Premium Member join:2002-12-03 Sachakhand ·RCN
1 edit |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Mar-10 11:29 pm
March 10, 2004 Updated threads |
|
Sparrow 1 edit |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Mar-15 5:00 pm
March 15, 2004 Updated threads |
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Mar-19 3:19 am
Re: March 19, 2004 Updated threads |
|
| Sparrow |
Sparrow
Premium Member
2004-Mar-27 11:05 am
March 27, 2004 Updated threads |
|
keith2468 Premium Member join:2001-02-03 Winnipeg, MB |
to Sparrow
Re: A note to Symantec RepsSymantec definitely needs to work on its customer service. Only spamcop.net is worse (and it basically relies on volunteers).
Unless you are prepared to hang on the phone, you are out of luck in getting responses.
Before I switched off of NIS2003, I emailed them with some questions on package pricing for my 2 machines. I got an auto-reply with some links to FAQS that said if I needed a reply from a real person email this other address.
Emailing that other address got me another auto-reply, and another email address if I needed a reply from a real person.
This third email address was the first email address.
Another time, a 3 years ago, I got the Happy99 virus. It was bonded to a non-executable file, a .jpg, so it couldn't infect me. However my NAV was set to scan all files.
TrendMicro picked it up. And TDS-3 picked it up. I queried the identification and Gavin (I think) emailed me back and said just edit the file and go to the bottom, you can see the code there. I did and I could.
So my NAV wasn't scanning non-executable files even though it was set to scan all files. This would be a problem for an admin who wanted to keep malware off of his/her system. People could store malware in non-executable files.
So I entered into a 3 week rally of trying to Symantec to address the problem. I did this on this forum support area, where their employees respond to your posts.
It was one person, then another, then another.
Each not familiar with the issue. None reading back more than 2 replies. All asking the same basic questions -- over and over and over. |
|
| |
to JTM1051
Re: Contact Symantec Corporate HeadquartersI've used Norton Antivirus for years; however, Norton isn't what it used to be... Ever virus it's caught (VERY FEW) I've had to purge using extreme measures. The others I had to find the hard way. I've switched since then since they couldn't delete VPC32 which kept on attaching itself to my antivirus and firewall every time I updated. I even reformatted a couple of times. NO LUCK.. Maybe the future editions of Norton will be good until then I wait and pray.  |
|