dslreports logo

56ker
@tnt3.gosford.au.da.u

56ker to Sordid One

Anon

to Sordid One

Re: Pings and things

I live in Australia and am thinking of getting ISDN instead of 56k... for the gaming only. All you guys recomend it? thanx alot mates
k6az
join:2003-09-13
Powhatan, VA

k6az

Member

ISDN is effectively 3-5 times faster than dialup, and the ping times are much faster, which makes surfing zip along. I'm not a gamer, but I understand that a lot of games run great on ISDN. Here are some of my ping times to various sites:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pinging k6az.com [66.113.168.236] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.113.168.236: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.113.168.236: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.113.168.236: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=51
Reply from 66.113.168.236: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 66.113.168.236:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 102ms, Maximum = 105ms, Average = 102ms

Pinging yahoo.com [66.218.71.198] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.218.71.198: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=247
Reply from 66.218.71.198: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=247
Reply from 66.218.71.198: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=247
Reply from 66.218.71.198: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 66.218.71.198:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 118ms, Maximum = 121ms, Average = 119ms

Pinging google.com [216.239.57.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.239.57.99: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=246
Reply from 216.239.57.99: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=246
Reply from 216.239.57.99: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=246
Reply from 216.239.57.99: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 216.239.57.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 117ms, Maximum = 121ms, Average = 119ms

Pinging pcpitstop.com [64.29.201.21] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=245
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 64.29.201.21:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 77ms, Maximum = 81ms, Average = 79ms

bolt
End of the line DSL sucks.
Premium Member
join:2003-11-11
Charlestown, IN

bolt to 56ker

Premium Member

to 56ker
My experiences with ISDN has also been great, aside for the installation nightmare. I consistantly get sub 100 pings for CoD, BF1942, and Vietcong. I also am getting better pings for Ultima Online and haven't had a lag kill since I've started using ISDN. I've only had one diconnect caused by the connection itself since it was installed mid-December. I'd highly reccomend it to any online gamer that wants to get a better gaming experience.

revy
@tds.net

revy to k6az

Anon

to k6az
I dont think the ingame ping rate in black hawk down is very accurate.