dslreports logo
 story category
Analyst: Dish Network is in Serious Trouble

At least one major telecom analyst believes that Dish Network is in big trouble -- trouble that even selling the company's hoarded spectrum troves won't fix. MoffettNathanson issued a research note this week insisting that "Dish's core business is now almost certainly worth less than its accumulated debt," and neither Dish's spectrum holdings -- or its Sling TV streaming video efforts -- will be able to help it. Dish has been losing TV subscribers at an alarming rate, in large part courtesy of a growing number of retransmission disputes at the company, which result in blacked out content and even angrier subscribers.

Click for full size
On one hand, Dish should be applauded for actually evolving, and unveiling Sling TV. Many incumbent cable providers have been too timid on this front; worried that offering a cheaper, more innovative streaming TV platform would cannibalize existing legacy pay TV subscribers.

But "with industry-wide gross margins in the vMVPD business at or below zero, it is reasonable to simply ignore Dish's Sling TV subscriptions as economically irrelevant," claims the Wall Street firm.

Dish's name has been tossed around as a possible M&A partner, most frequently as a possible suitor or partner for Sprint or T-Mobile. But Dish boss Charlie Ergen has an industry reputation for being immeasurably and unnecessarily difficult in negotiations, resulting in little traction on that front. Dish's ongoing claims that it intends to build a wireless network also seem perpetually in limbo.

Dish has been hoarding spectrum for the better part of several years, though MoffettNathanson insists there's few suitors at the moment eager to pay the kind of money Dish is looking for.

"Commodity theory requires that there are large numbers of independent actors on the buy side," states the report. "In wireless, there are but four potential buyers. As it happens, none currently have the economic firepower to buy Dish Network's spectrum even if they wanted to."

In short satellite video delivery is becoming unsexy in the broadband era (see AT&T's indications it may scrap DirecTV and go fully OTT), and Sling TV won't provide healthy enough profit margins to keep the company afloat as it slowly but steadily loses traditional TV viewers. And with no broadband revenues to lean on like giant competitors AT&T, Verizon and Comcast, Dish may be left with few options.

Most recommended from 44 comments


nfotiu
join:2009-01-25

6 recommendations

nfotiu

Member

Not surprising news at all

Cable has been able to fight against cord cutters by using tactics like charging less for tv/internet than standalone internet. Dish doesn't have that leverage and it makes it very easy to quit them. Also Dish was a favorite for cost conscious consumers, and now there are better options.

Directv at least has Sunday Ticket as leverage.

Both companies though will likely see rural customers with crappy internet as their only customers eventually.
ISurfTooMuch
join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

5 recommendations

ISurfTooMuch

Member

Dish needs to change

If I were Charlie Ergen, I'd look at some radical changes. First, get to work building that wireless network. Maybe go all-in on fixed wireless. Forget about big cities. Focus on small cities, especially on the fringes, where wireline broadband stops. Basically, cuild a viable alternative to satellite Internet.

Second, do something even more radical: get out of pay TV. Instead, switch to a leased-access satellite model so that channels can get carriage and broadcast FTA. That way, cord-cutters could get a selection of free programming for just the cost of equipment. Supplement that with pay channels such as HBO, but keep the core programming free. And, as another poster said, develop original programming. And, if the receiver had a hard drive, people could "subscribe" to various shows that would be downloaded from a data stream on the satellite to be viewed on-demand.
Ostracus
join:2011-09-05
Henderson, KY

3 recommendations

Ostracus

Member

Tail leads dog.

Surprised they haven't done what other content distributors has done and created their own content. e.g. Netflix. Long as they hitch their wagon to the Hollywood horse they're going to keep having this problem.

Anonaed44
@att.net

2 recommendations

Anonaed44

Anon

Debt spin off

They will just do what every other co does.
They will spin off into separate companies move all the debt to one part. Sell the other for tons..execs make money..bond holders a nd stock holder get screwed. Employees lose most