dslreports logo
 story category
Merger Synergies? AT&T Losing TV, Postpaid Wireless Subscribers

AT&T's earnings indicate that despite spending $69 billion to acquire DirecTV, the companies collectively continue to see a net loss in overall video subscribers. AT&T's earnings report indicates that AT&T added 328,000 DirecTV subscribers in the first quarter, but lost 382,000 U-Verse TV subscribers -- resulting in a net loss of 54,000 video subscribers during the period. The U-Verse TV losses are a severe uptick from the 240,000 U-Verse TV subscribers AT&T lost in the fourth quarter, and the 92,000 subscribers it lost in the third.

Click for full size
Note this isn't as bad as the initial numbers look, since some of the defections can be explained by the fact that AT&T is actively trying to push new users toward satellite and appears interested in shuttering its traditional U-Verse TV platform.

Still, the overall net loss in users indicate that AT&T continues to be somewhat plagued by cord cutting and customers migrating back to cable operators due to faster broadband bundles and upgraded cable set top boxes.

On the broadband front, AT&T continues to also hemorrhage DSL customers, losing 181,000 on the quarter. That's in part by design; like Verizon AT&T has no interest in upgrading many of its DSL customers, and is happy to have them leave to cable or -- better yet -- AT&T's own wireless services. Though offset by U-Verse broadband additions, AT&T saw a net addition of just 5,000 broadband subscribers on the quarter.

The company likely won't be making any new customer friends on the broadband front this current quarter either, given the company recently announced it intends to implement broadband caps and overage fees on its U-Verse broadband customers starting May 23. Assuming customers have options, that could act to accelerate AT&T's fixed-line broadband woes.

On the wireless front, AT&T continues to be plagued by competition from T-Mobile, who is leeching away the company's most valuable target -- postpaid wireless subscribers (who are more likely to not only pay more money each month, but actually pay their bills on time). All told, AT&T's earnings report indicates the company saw a net loss of 363,000 postpaid phone subscribers on the quarter.

In other words, AT&T's barely seeing broadband growth, is losing its most valuable wireless subscribers to T-Mobile, and is seeing a net loss in overall video subscribers. That's not exactly the kind of revolution AT&T promised when the company pitched investors on its $69 billion DirecTV acquisition plan. Still, AT&T applauded its own performance.

"It was a good start to the year," AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said of the results. "We had solid financial results and executed well on our strategy to be the premier integrated communications provider for businesses and consumers."

Most recommended from 75 comments



Gilitar
join:2012-02-01
Mobile, AL

19 recommendations

Gilitar

Member

Focus on these three things

If AT&T wants to stay relevant they had better focus on and expedite Gigapower upgrades. On the wireless side they need to match T Mobile's offerings and policies. When it comes to Directv they need to offer basic packaging with just the most popular channels at a low price point.
thxultra
join:2015-04-14
Aurora, IL

16 recommendations

thxultra

Member

AT&T is pushing customers off UVerse they should go to Cable instead of D*

AT&T told me to switch to Direc Tv from UVerse and the whole process was a complete mess. I wish I would have switched to cable or cut the cord. They messed up my installation appointment and then when I finally got the service it took them 3 months to get the UVerseTV off my bill. Do yourself a favor and don't get service from AT&T. On a side note I know more and more people cutting the cord because TV prices have gotten out of control. Do yourself a favor and stay far away from AT&T.
shmerl
join:2013-10-21

11 recommendations

shmerl

Member

What are they thinking exactly?

They are eager to buy dying legacy business (TV is going the way of the dodo), spending some crazy billions on it, instead of investing into something that's actually useful for the future (i.e. landline networks).
decifal7
join:2007-03-10
Bon Aqua, TN

8 recommendations

decifal7

Member

cap?

Isn't att planning on enforcing their landline caps in may as well? I'm sure thats going to do wonders for their numbers as well.. Cept in the few areas where they are the only provider.... I know if google fiber was at my house i'd sign up in a second... These caps are just dumb

TIGERON
join:2008-03-11
Boston, MA
Motorola MG7550

3 edits

7 recommendations

TIGERON

Member

Let the next sell off begin

Just as digital switches like Lucent's #5ESS and Nortel's (now Genband) DMS made the analog switches obsolete, they were in turn rendered obsolete, along with all circuit based telecom platforms by TCP/IP (packet) based platforms like Uverse and FiOS. But due to several restraints, some capital based and some regulatory based, the telecom providers are now stuck with maintaining two incompatible networks, one circuit based and one packet based. While they're trying to build out the latter, and somehow make use of the former, a new technology sometimes referred to as wireless broadband is being developed and rumored to be close to deployment. That event would render about 90% of the existing platforms, including Uverse and FiOS obsolete perhaps before they're fully built out, along with all the currently installed copper and most of fiber optic cables and all of the infrastructure that supports them.

Now, if it was your money, or your stockholders' money, where would you spend it? Would you continue to train replacement cable repairmen to replace those old guys you trained on splicing & repairing copper back in the '70s? Would you spend it on new IPDSLAM's for your central offices to expand your Uverse offerings to new neighborhoods, knowing it was nearing its obsolescence? Would you buy and place more fiber and the necessary multiplexers knowing they would also likely be obsolete before they were installed?

Hmm? C'mon make your mind up! Its only billions of dollars! The clock is ticking!

Let's get real : AT&T is going to sell off its wireline as they do not want those assets anymore. It's a done deal. As soon as Frontier has time to digest the latest 3-state Verizon acquisition Randall Stephenson and Daniel McCarthy will move forward to another massive AT&T to Frontier wireline handoff.

Personally, It can't come soon enough. I've had it with AT&T's expensive, data capped, sub-par lousy service. At least Frontier wants the wireline and is bringing service to communities who previously had nothing.

»www.latimes.com/business ··· umn.html
grabacon9
join:2013-08-21
Newark, OH

4 recommendations

grabacon9

Member

AT&T Sucks

I hope they lose more customers. They're greed pricks that need a lesson in keeping customers ad prices low so that they can get them and retain them!