dslreports logo
 story category
New AT&T Map Highlights Gigabit Deployments

On the heels of a handful of new launches for its gigabit U-verse service, AT&T has released a new map highlighting markets where gigabit service is currently available, where it's under construction, and where it's planned. Note that while a city may be marked "available," AT&T's deployments in those cities are highly selective -- usually focusing on high-end development communities.

Click for full size
"Service is now available in 15 markets across the United States, and we’ve announced plans to bring the service to parts of the Jacksonville, St. Louis and San Antonio markets," notes AT&T in a blog post.

While the service starts at $70 in markets where the threat of Google Fiber is creating competition (Austin, Raleigh), promotional pricing for gigabit service in all other markets usually begins between $110 and $120 a month. AT&T charges users a premium if they want to opt out of AT&T's deep packet inspection behavioral advertising systems (read: being snooped on).

According to AT&T, they've now launched gigabit service in small portions of fifteen major markets, with plans to expand residential fiber to portions of 25 overall markets. Ultimately, AT&T says this gigabit fiber service will be expanded to "reach" (which can sometimes mean "pass," but not necessarily "serve") 14 million residential and commercial locations.

Most recommended from 29 comments



mackey
Premium Member
join:2007-08-20

1 edit

4 recommendations

mackey

Premium Member

Too little too late

Despite at&t "exploring" Los Angeles, our cable provider, TWC, has stated they will be deploying gigabit over DOCSIS 3.1 next year. I also expect that TWC's deployment will end up having faster download speeds then at&t's as at&t uses plain GPON split 16/32 ways. Speed tests posted in the Uverse forum are only showing ~600 mbps locally and even worse going cross-country (most likely due to crap peering). As such I'll be sticking with TWC who, right now, is giving me a solid 350 mbps 24/7 even though it's just D3.0 and 16 channels. Also, the one pic of at&t's OLT that has been posted shows it only having 2x 1 gbps uplinks per 4 PON ports, though it might be an old pic or in-progress installation.

Edit: not to mention TWC allows the use of your own equipment which allows a "modem-only" clean pass-through whereas at&t REQUIRES their all-in-one gateway which forces a tiny NAT table (2560 connections max) on you even if you use IP-Passthrough or purchase static IPs.