Yet Another Major FCC E-Rate Scandal Emerges Millions Going to Orthodox Schools -- Where Nobody Can Use Internet Wednesday Feb 20 2013 08:37 EDT Tipped by cabana I've been writing about the dysfunction of the FCC's E-Rate program for a very long time. The system, which you pay into via Universal Service Fund (USF) fees, is designed to deliver broadband and technology services to the nation's schools and libraries. Instead, like the larger USF, it's more like a slush fund, where money paid in frequently isn't tracked by the government, and spending accountability is minimal to non-existent. As you might expect, this has traditionally resulted in oodles of fraud by both carriers and schools. At various times, between 26% and 40% of USF funds have been poured into E-Rate, and the program has doled out more than $25 billion since its inception in 1998. The program has great potential and occasionally great successes, yet it js repeatedly marred by the fact the FCC historically has not done a good job tracking spending. For years now, the General Accounting Office (GAO) has issued an endless flood of reports on how the FCC should actually pay attention, and for just as many years the FCC has insisted they'd get right on that. With that as a backdrop, there's yet another E-rate scandal brewing in New York City, where new reports have popped up that sing an all-too-familiar tune. The New York Jewish Week has been running a series of stories noting how numerous schools (and libraries that in some cases aren't really libraries) are getting millions in E-Rate funds -- despite the fact they offer no Internet connectivity or computer use to students. The schools see Internet use as a "corrupting force capable of undermining their way of life," yet happily gobble millions in funds with the FCC napping: quote: Recent graduates (of Yeshivat Avir Yakov) report never having seen — let alone used — a computer in their classrooms, and video of the inside of the Avir Yakov building shot within the past two weeks and obtained by The Jewish Week seems to support their accounts: not one of the yeshiva’s classrooms, public areas or designated resource rooms seen on the video contains a computer, or even a telephone. So it comes as a surprise that the approximately 3,000-student school has, since 1998, been allotted more than $3.3 million in government funds earmarked for Internet and other telecommunications technology.
This of course has been going on for more than a decade, and the FCC quite simply appears incapable of getting its house in order. Scandals like this keep bubbling up around the country, and despite jail time and oceans of bad press, the FCC still isn't adequately auditing how your USF contributions are spent. |
|
Comcast business is $60 a monthUnsubsidized Comcast business is $60 a month. Why does any school or library need a subsidy? | |
| | axus join:2001-06-18 Washington, DC |
axus
Member
2013-Feb-19 10:36 am
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthWell, that's over $10000 for 15 years of service, but not millions! | |
| | morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 |
to elizabeth4
Most schools have hundreds or thousands of computers and users. A basic Comcast business internet account will not support this level of use. We haven't discussed telephone needs...
Edit: I do not support the USF or E-Rate programs. I agree that these are slush funds abused by the providers and recipients. | |
| | | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2013-Feb-19 10:57 am
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthPerhaps it would if the instructors would stop watching porn and surfing eBay. | |
| | | pandora Premium Member join:2001-06-01 Outland |
to morbo
said by morbo:Most schools have hundreds or thousands of computers and users. A basic Comcast business internet account will not support this level of use. We haven't discussed telephone needs...
Edit: I do not support the USF or E-Rate programs. I agree that these are slush funds abused by the providers and recipients. Does anyone have a link to a .gov site which could tell us how many network devices a school has? I have Comcast business and it's pretty decent. If an area doesn't have decent Internet infrastructure, shouldn't we be more concerned with a build out, than to expensive stuff to one or two buildings while the rest of a community has nothing? | |
| | | | pandora |
pandora
Premium Member
2013-Feb-20 8:29 am
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthI just went to the article, Cox Cable provides cable and internet in Whiteriver Arizona. The school district that is a "success" per the article about E-Rate fraud.
The total IT expenditures reported by the school to the state are $33,000 out of about a 19 million dollar school budget.
Why is this "success" being subsidized? The school should contact Cox Cable, and ask about a business rate. | |
| | | | | CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picture Premium Member join:2011-08-11 NYC |
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthIs this a public or private school? I would strongly agree that all private schools should be inelligible for these funds... they are businesses after all and SHOULD get business accounts. Public schools, however, are already paid paid for by tax dollars so subsidizing services seems perfectly reasonable to me. The tax is hardly 'outrageous'; mismanaged obviously but the answer to that is to manage it properly, not get rid if it. Cut private school businesses off the corporate welfare teat and the fee will go down considerably.
The argument that 'communities should have found a way to make due by now' is ridiculous. That is like saying they should get rid of busses because the kids should have found other ways to get to school by now. | |
| | | | | | pandora Premium Member join:2001-06-01 Outland |
pandora
Premium Member
2013-Feb-20 9:44 am
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthsaid by CXM_Splicer:Public schools, however, are already paid paid for by tax dollars so subsidizing services seems perfectly reasonable to me. Public schools will make better decisions if they are aware of prices. There have been umpteen stimulus programs, Internet build out programs, and what not over the past few administrations. It's time to stop this boondoggle. I'd like to see both the federal subscriber line charge AND the 911 charge removed from our bills. Local communities can fund their schools, police and fire. They will make better decisions without bureaucrats in the federal government publishing regulations. | |
| | | | | | |
1 recommendation |
SubscriberLi
Anon
2013-Feb-22 11:28 am
Feds don't get all feesThe "Federal Subscriber Line Charge" is not a fee collected by the government. Your local phone company collects that fee and keeps it. Phone companies put in the word "Federal" to deceive customers into thinking that it's some kind of tax. The only Federal involvement is that the FCC sets the maximum a phone company can charge. » www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia ··· hone#slcThe 911 fee is a state fee. It seems to me most states put it in the treasury, and then spend it however they like, but I haven't researched it thoroughly. | |
|
| | | | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
to pandora
All public schools are "subsidized". Whether it comes out of the left pocket of the taxpayer (e-rate or whatever) or the right pocket (state and Federal spending) is pretty irrelevant. None of it is the "school's money" and they'll never be careful with it...ever. | |
| | | | | | pandora Premium Member join:2001-06-01 Outland |
pandora
Premium Member
2013-Feb-20 9:48 am
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthsaid by skeechan:All public schools are "subsidized". Whether it comes out of the left pocket of the taxpayer (e-rate or whatever) or the right pocket (state and Federal spending) is pretty irrelevant. None of it is the "school's money" and they'll never be careful with it...ever. Yup, let it come from the local community. If the federal government wants to give away cash, let it go to the states. If more revenue is needed, add to the income tax. The U.S. phone tax system is ludicrous imo. | |
| | | | | | | CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picture Premium Member join:2011-08-11 NYC |
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthI certainly would welcome the fee being collected at the state level instead if it were used only for schools. Since it is also used for extending broadband into rural areas, collecting it at the federal level is more fair to states with lower populations where the telecom companies discriminate more. If you think your public schools are making poor decisions then run for the local school board. That is what local government is all about. Perhaps you could also volunteer some cost saving measures in their network design. | |
| | | | | | | | pandora Premium Member join:2001-06-01 Outland |
pandora
Premium Member
2013-Feb-20 3:36 pm
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthsaid by CXM_Splicer:If you think your public schools are making poor decisions then run for the local school board. That is what local government is all about. Perhaps you could also volunteer some cost saving measures in their network design. School boards have limited power, and I have been providing assistance at my local school for many years. Federal and state regulations are overwhelming. Getting rid of a complex program, and having Congress allocate from tax revenues is simpler, and would likely reduce help reduce opportunity for fraud. | |
|
| | | | | | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
to pandora
Taxes from top to bottom are ludicrous, nearly as ludicrous as the amount of money governments local to Federal spend. | |
| | | | | | | | CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picture Premium Member join:2011-08-11 NYC |
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthsaid by skeechan:Taxes from top to bottom are ludicrous, nearly as ludicrous as the amount of money governments local to Federal spend. Tell me how to opt-out of defense spending and I will sign up tomorrow | |
| | | | | | | | |
1 recommendation |
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthsaid by CXM_Splicer:said by skeechan:Taxes from top to bottom are ludicrous, nearly as ludicrous as the amount of money governments local to Federal spend. Tell me how to opt-out of defense spending and I will sign up tomorrow The defense industry is an absolute cancerous plague that needs to be eradicated asap. | |
| | | | | | | | | | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2013-Feb-21 12:05 pm
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthNo kidding. The defense budget in 2001 was something like $300B. Now it is well north of 2X that. The US accounts for more than 40% of global military spending. Same gluttony is true for just about every inch of government, local up to Federal.
All this talk of sequester...not a SINGLE DIME is being cut by the sequester. They talk of layoffs, it's all lies. The sequester simply lowers the rate of increase. There should be 0 increase. Just to be clear, the sequester still means more money in defense spending, just not as much as the military industrial complex wants. It's insane.
Outlaw baseline budgeting across the board. Every department, every year should have to 1, justify their very existence, 2, justify their budget request. | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
to CXM_Splicer
Tell me how to opt out of education fundingsaid by CXM_Splicer: Tell me how to opt-out of defense spending and I will sign up tomorrow
Tell me how to see that my money is spent on Defense Police Ammunition Guns over education welfare I am all for it! Schools should be 100% non government activities.. 100% YOU the parent have a rugrat, then YOU THE PARENT pay for the education of your RUGRAT. Period. You have the right to have an education, yes... but only so long as you PAY FOR IT! Or Homeschool, either way.. I have the right NOT TO PAY FOR YOUR rugrat! I have no problem with the local village/township/borough/city/county running a school district so long as those who attend it PAY FOR IT 100%.. 10,000 tax payers does not equal 10K school tax payers.. If I don't have rugrats then I don't need to pay for that! Your carnal activities have consequences, PAY UP! No, don't bother with this or that study about how education keeps the deliquinets off the prison route, or better soceity etc.. HOGWASH! | |
| | | | | | | | | | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2013-Feb-21 12:09 pm
Re: Tell me how to opt out of education fundingWhile I'm no fan of welfare, public education leads to economic growth. An educated public is a productive public, and the taxes paid by educated workers more than pay for the government investment in their education.
The key is compelling kids to learn...you don't move up in grade until you pass a standardized exam. If you are 15 and can't read...you are 18 and still in 3rd grade. Make grade inflation a crime. Outlaw the teacher unions so that teaching is a true meritocracy and the best teachers make the biggest money (they can bargain for pay and benefits but can be fired at will by the district). Poor performing teachers have to go through additional training or they are canned and replaced.
Here in California, there no shortage of teacher applicants, fully credentialed, but because of the teacher unions, districts can't can bad teachers and make room for new ones. | |
| | | | | | | | | | CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picture Premium Member join:2011-08-11 NYC |
Re: Tell me how to opt out of education fundingWhile I agree with you on the need for good teachers (and to get rid of bad ones), the problem goes much deeper than a simple 'it's the union's fault'.
Districts have a period where they get to decide if a teacher is 'good' or not. They can be fired before they are tenured if they really are no good. The problem is that districts don't make these decisions based on the quality of education... they make them on $$$. A 'bad' teacher is one that makes the most money or is about to retire with a big pension. THOSE are the 'bad' teachers the districts want to get rid of. If they had their way, there would be no experienced teachers at all since they could constantly hire new young teachers at minimum pay. That is why teachers stay on during their tenure period (unless they are major screw-ups) because the districts don't want to loose cheap bodies in the classroom; they couldn't care less about the quality of education they are giving.
True grade inflation should be criminal but standardized testing is not the way to accomplish that. When you tie teacher evaluations to the standardized tests grade inflation is exactly what you will get... along with teaching to the test and a watered-down education. There is definitely a need for independent evaluation of the student's learning but a standard test is an inefficient way to accomplish that.
Being 15 and unable to read is a very common problem actually... not because of bad teachers but because of immigration. An immigrant from Germany who can't speak a word of English is expected to pass the exact same standard tests as all the other kids in his/her grade level. What do you think happens when you tie that kid's grades to the teachers' evaluations? | |
|
| | | | | | | | | CXM_Splicer |
to TuxRaiderPen2
Hahaha, you actually want an uneducated lower class with no welfare but with the right to own firearms? Do you have any clue what a society like that would look like? The economy that you profit from would turn to shit very quickly.
How about we make tax spending decisions open to the people? You direct your taxes to defense, I will direct mine to education. | |
|
| | | |
Devicive to pandora
Anon
2013-Feb-22 5:03 pm
to pandora
Well, if you're interested in a particular school or district, you can display the 471; Block 2, Item 7e shows the number of devices connected to the Internet. For districts, the number is cumulative, so you won't be able to see numbers for individual schools in the district. For example, Yeshiva Avir Yakov, mentioned in the post above, claims to have: 3500 students 95 rooms with phone service 65 connections to the Internet 25 classrooms with Internet access 40 computers or other devices with Internet access Displaying the Form 471 is a little bit of hassle, but here are the steps: 1) Go to » www.sl.universalservice. ··· blic.asp2) Put in the first word or two of the school or district's name, followed by the % symbol. 3) Find the school or district in the list that comes up, and copy the Entity Number for the district. 4) Go to » www.slforms.universalser ··· eck.aspx5) Paste in the Entity Number you copied in Step 3. 6) Select FY2012 for Funding Year. (You can select an earlier year if you want older data. Most districts have not) 7) Click the "Search" button 8) Click "Continue" 9) Copy the "Form 471 Application Number" 10) Go to » www.slforms.universalser ··· rch.aspx11) Paste in the application number you copied in Step 9. 12) Leave the Security Code Number box empty 13) Click the "Display" button. 14) Click the blue "Block 2&3" button at the top of the page. 15) You'll see the number of devices connected to the Internet under Item 7e | |
|
| kontosxyzzy join:2001-10-04 West Henrietta, NY |
to elizabeth4
said by elizabeth4:Unsubsidized Comcast business is $60 a month. Why does any school or library need a subsidy? Because if a school doesn't buy the e-rate product they do have to pay for it themselves. If they go through the e-rate program, they won't have to pay, and the e-rate sales team at the ISP/Telco will help them find the equivalent service which will be billed in the $6000 per month range. So the IT people for the school, look at their cost for simple business class service: ~$700/year or e-rate service: $FREE. Then they go for the cheaper option. Everybody wins. The Gov't/FCC has helped a school get Internet access, the school gets a connection, and the ISP makes a sale. And that's when there isn't even any fraud involved. | |
| | | |
mj3431
Member
2013-Feb-19 11:48 am
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthIt appears you're not familiar with how e-rate works. The pricing on most dedicated services is driven by a state contract to begin with, so schools already get better than commercial pricing. Then the e-rate discount percentage is based on the population that qualifies for free/reduced lunches. Those with high enough percentages qualify for more + additional funding categories.
Rarely does e-rate make a connection outright free. It also covers basic telephone access, cellular, and long distance, not just Internet service. | |
| | | | kontosxyzzy join:2001-10-04 West Henrietta, NY |
kontos
Member
2013-Feb-19 5:07 pm
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthsaid by mj3431:It appears you're not familiar with how e-rate works. Actually I think I am. said by mj3431:The pricing on most dedicated services is driven by a state contract to begin with, so schools already get better than commercial pricing. Yes, they're funneled to the high-cost/high-margin services available on the e-rate contract; even if a simple and cheap solution would be appropriate. This is exactly how you see stories here about small rural schools in WV using e-rate to get a pair of redundant $50k installed. So exactly as I said, you get a really nice and expensive service installed even though a cheaper alternative could have been just as good at solving the problem. said by mj3431:Rarely does e-rate make a connection outright free. It also covers basic telephone access, cellular, and long distance, not just Internet service. In the public sector, getting grant money is seen as a goal on its own. Spending a couple thousand to bring in several thousand in grants is viewed by many even if there are no benefits realized from the grants. The size of the kingdom is still increased. | |
| | | | | |
mj3431
Member
2013-Feb-19 6:14 pm
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthPerhaps providers and competition are a little different in NY. In MO there's often not multiple options for dedicated high bandwidth access.
If an organization is being steered toward a product they don't need, don't blame the provider. Blame the idiot IT manager for not doing his/her homework and purchasing a product that is unnecessary. The goal of the business is to make money. | |
| | | | | | |
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthsaid by mj3431:Perhaps providers and competition are a little different in NY. In MO there's often not multiple options for dedicated high bandwidth access. Level 3, Verizon Business/MCI, Cogent, TW Telecom, Windstream, will run metro business fiber anywhere if you sign a contract, plus the local cable co. All them have metro fiber in MO. | |
| | | | | | | |
mj3431
Member
2013-Feb-19 8:00 pm
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthThis is getting OT, but I'm aware of all of this, and none of them pass a building I'm familiar with.
And yes, I already asked the local cable, 2 area telcos, and Windstream, and they all refused to build to that location because there were no other business opportunities near it. They (recently) all told me they just couldn't make any money off it. Period. Thanks to federal stimulus funding the building will be a Community Anchor and served with 1Gbps service before the year ends for little more than 2 T-1's now. | |
| | | | | | | | |
WYOIT
Anon
2013-Feb-20 4:04 am
Re: Comcast business is $60 a monthOr you have CenturyLink or Optimun that want several thousand dollars to build out a few hundred feet of fiber... in one case $15,000 for 90 feeet. E-Rate does have some success, but it is still all bureaucratic BS. I know there are a couple progressive states with smart leadership in IT looking to adjust things in that area... time will tell if it will work. | |
|
|
Mr Anon
Anon
2013-Feb-19 10:46 am
I haven't read yet but...I can tell you what E-Rate does around here and its a lot!
E-Rate pays a lot of things for us, like internal connection maintenance, WAN, Internet, Cellular and wireline service. Also support of approved items but that we have lost. Also we are in danger of loosing most of our support as E-Rate this year really isn't helping those under 90%. You can still put in for it but we've already seem memos that say don't hold your breath.
This gets us not only the connection its self but equipment for that connection, servers for use of it (only approved items) and without it we would be a bad shape!
I do plan to read the article because I find it hard that this stuff is going on, not that it is impossible just hard. We get scrutinized on just about everything we submit and how we do it. Occasionally they check our numbers, filing and if we are in the window to get hardware, that we have it and that its actually in use.
Like anything it can be misused and abused but is is extremely needed! | |
| | |
Re: I haven't read yet but...Then put it up for a property tax referendum and learn really how important it is. | |
| | | ••••••••• | | jester121 Premium Member join:2003-08-09 Lake Zurich, IL |
to Mr Anon
said by Mr Anon :Like anything it can be misused and abused but is is extremely needed! Of course it is, everything in government is extremely needed. Hence the wailing and gnashing of teeth at the slightest hint of slowing the rate of spending growth or *gasp* an actual budget cut.... But this is Illinois, so I have no doubt we'll hear the standard refrain -- "if you don't increased taxes we'll make the children suffer, and furlough the cops and firemen ( while of course the "administration" budget hums along normally)." | |
| | pandora Premium Member join:2001-06-01 Outland |
to Mr Anon
said by Mr Anon :I can tell you what E-Rate does around here and its a lot! Switches? Servers? You are kidding (I hope). The school district should plan it's network using it's tax base. A 24 port gigabit Ethernet switch cost me $90 (unmanaged rack mount), I could have spent a few grand more, for a really nice one. Sometimes, doing with what one has is a good learning experience. | |
| | | ••••••••••••• | | |
Mr Anon to Mr Anon
Anon
2013-Feb-20 9:50 am
to Mr Anon
Sorry, actually have to work now. I know I can't change most people's opinions anyway.
Gotta drop the thread. | |
|
IowaCowboyLost in the Supermarket Premium Member join:2010-10-16 Springfield, MA |
VoIP servicesMany budget strapped schools are upgrading their phones to cheaper VoIP services that are typically cheaper than traditional telephone service (even with the E-rate subsidy).
As for the Orthodox school in question, sounds like a clear case of fraud. They think that the Internet and telephone has poisoned society but they seem to think stealing is ok.
I myself am Catholic and its against the Ten Commandments to steal. | |
| | ••• | |
AlexNYC
Member
2013-Feb-19 10:59 am
You just figured this now?WOW ... yes, I don't think this is much news or will surprise any New Yorker. Welcome to Brooklyn baby! | |
| | |
Twaddle
Anon
2013-Feb-20 10:53 am
Re: You just figured this now?And that attitude is part of the problem(unless you are in on the shell game) you should be outraged that YOUR money is being stolen. | |
|
|
Will it ever change???Funny how the government abuse's OUR money, & how funny the people abuse the government, the bad part about it is, the Government knows about it, but doesn't do anything to fix it. That's why we owe Trillions to China... | |
| |
DWN2DV8
Anon
2013-Feb-19 11:18 am
Welcome to AmericasWelcome to earth. Now you don't worry about what we do with the money. We know what's best. You just keep working. | |
| |
teach121
Anon
2013-Feb-19 11:24 am
No AccessThe issue many people forget, is that many rural areas STILL have no access to wireline broadband. E-Rate funding is the only way a district can afford the T-1's necessary due to lack of broadband infrastructure. If they could get a $60 a month connection that is faster than a multi-linked frame relay and without doing the paperwork that E-Rate requires...they would. | |
| | jester121 Premium Member join:2003-08-09 Lake Zurich, IL |
jester121
Premium Member
2013-Feb-19 12:08 pm
Re: No Accesssaid by teach121 :The issue many people forget, is that many rural areas STILL have no access to wireline broadband. E-Rate funding is the only way a district can afford the T-1's necessary due to lack of broadband infrastructure. Then why are agencies in areas that HAVE been built up over the past 20 years still suckling at the E-Rate teat even though there are plenty of cheap, fast, reliable alternatives available? Because it's "someone else's money". And in many states, there's an entrenched bureaucracy that manages the (slow, overpriced, shitty) public agency network and no one wants to rock the boat. | |
| | me1212 join:2008-11-20 Lees Summit, MO ·Google Fiber
|
to teach121
It doesn't have to be wireline, a good fixed WISP will work fine. Yeah I know no everywhere has that. In those cases I can see where you could have a point, but then why are the places that DO have good wireline still getting the money? They should not. | |
|
1 recommendation |
ughI am a network admin for a library. We do not get Erate funding because it requires ALL computers to be filtered. Adult machines also. We want the adult machines to be not filtered.
It upsets me that schools and libraries that do not even provide internet at all are receiving funding yet we do not because we do not filter everything. | |
| | |
mj3431
Member
2013-Feb-19 11:52 am
Re: ughE-rate can also be used for basic telecommunications services like local, long distance, and cellular.
You could think outside the box and have a great (discounted) filtered connection for patron use and a separate gateway for adult users (non-discounted). | |
| | Metatron2008You're it Premium Member join:2008-09-02 united state |
to majortom1029
This isn't normal funding, this is fraud. Regular theft should also upset you.
Hopefully soon something will happen to this school... | |
|
JimThePCGuyFormerly known as schja01. MVM join:2000-04-27 Morton Grove, IL |
Better audit those Amish schools too.Is any money going to Amish schools? | |
| elray join:2000-12-16 Santa Monica, CA |
elray
Member
2013-Feb-19 2:04 pm
Yet another reason to cancel and refund the programLet the taxpayers keep their money and decide for themselves how best to spend it, rather than stealing it from them so a few politicians in Washington can play Santa. | |
| |
fred_6544567
Anon
2013-Feb-19 2:20 pm
dumb questionWhy do schools need internet access anyway? Are all the students surfing the internet while in class or what?
if you are a teacher and you want content from the internet for your classes, download it ahead of time.
i haven't been in a school or juco setting for oer 10 years but i wonder whats going on. Are they all on facebook during class? is there any real learning going on? | |
| | ••••••••• | DHRacerTech Monkey join:2000-10-10 Lake Arrowhead, CA 1 edit
1 recommendation |
What? That makes no senseLet me start with a qualifying statement. I work for a public school district and we make extensive use of E-rate funding to supply infrastructure needed for student learning and acheivement.
Some facts about E-rate: Erate DOES NOT PAY FOR END DEVICES: NO COMPUTERS, iPADs etc! So this article to suggest that Orthodox schools shouldn't be getting Erate when they don't have any computers is ludicrous. They obviously get E-rate for the things E-rate does do.
Erate funds two things:
1. Priority 1 funding: Provides WAN links to school sites. This can be copper lines such as 56K lines, Fractional T-1s, full T-1s, multiples of such, or Fiber (such as FIOS like services). This also included Voice Phone services to school sites.
Priority 1 funding is funded and awarded first and is the most important component. If all the money is used up here, the next level, Priority 2, isn't funded at all. This hasn't happened yet but is rumoured to be the future as more and more districts apply for Erate funding and the money gets used up.
Priority 2 funding: Network Equipment
1. Servers if they provide erate qualified services (things that make a student be able to access the network/internet: DHCP, DNS, AD DC). Erate DOES NOT cover file servers, etc.
2. Network Infrastructure Hardware: Routers, Core Switches, Edge Switches, Wireless APs and Controllers. Does not pay for Management Software and does not pay for any hardware not approved by Erate themselves!
Now Erate was paying for maintenance in years before, but now it is not and schools that managed to purchase overly expensive networks and services with Erate funding are finding that they cannot afford the Maintenance now that they have to pay all that themselves.
E-rate does cover whatever the base, default warranty the products or services come with. It does not cover any additional extended warranties or services that do not come with the product at initial purchase.
That's it!
Now nothing is free. Schools and districts apply based on the percentage of free and reduced student lunches. This can range from 99% on down. However, the latest from Erate is that the minimum funding will only go to those districts at 90% or more. That means it goes to the Districts with the poorest students. The rest simply don't get Erate.
That also means that traditional budget funding by local bonds, raising taxes, etc, is difficult for areas with depressed economies, etc., so E-rate is very helpful for these Districts that otherwise don't have the surrounding socio-economic means to fully fund their school improvoment projects.
Erate does have systems in place for applying for, acquiring and then auditing in place that is very strict and specific and does have to be approved at the highest levels before you can even get anything.
But there is fraud and waste, even with all that, but it is limited. No matter the rules there are always those that learn to game the system.
Hope this info helps!
Edited to add: Forgot about Maintenance and added a bit on that. | |
| | |
mj3431
Member
2013-Feb-19 11:36 pm
Re: What? That makes no senseAnd I thought I was the only one that can see the good this program provides. There's no denying that fraud will happen but it's not like we read about it every day. I can personally that the PIA reviews and auditing have definitely gotten more comprehensive over the last few years and that's why we are hearing about these abusers being caught.
It's not a perfect program but it really does help. | |
| | |
Sensible to DHRacer
Anon
2013-Feb-22 6:13 pm
to DHRacer
While the E-Rate does not pay for computers or phones, it does require that the applicants have sufficient quantities of end user devices to utilize the services sought. (See Item 25 on the Form 471.) So a school which has no computers in instructional areas cannot apply for anything but voice services.
It seems odd that Yeshiva Avir Yakov, which says it has 50 computers connected to the Internet and 225 rooms with a phone, received almost $500,000 in Internal Connections in 2011-2012, and over $500,000 in 2010-2011. A million dollars for a network with 50 computers and phone system for 225 phones? It strains credulity.
The E-Rate is a great program. But some applicants are abusing it. | |
|
1 recommendation |
Do not.lump everyone into the general term of Orthodox. There are several different forms of Orthodox. When living in one of their communities you understand and know the difference and know that many of them have TV and computers and Internet. | |
| |
Forsaken77
Anon
2013-Feb-20 9:02 am
Sounds Like I Should Open A Library....At my house! Lol. Those fools at the fcc could be supporting my retirement. But on a more serious note, the FCC should be helping give back to Americans in need with all that wasted money, or pay down our deficit. But instead they've been giving over 3 million dollars a year, for the last 15 years, to some greedy Jewish school that's flat out STEALING!!! | |
| |
Twaddle
Anon
2013-Feb-20 9:52 am
Not with public moneyYou want to start a "private" religious school, go ahead and get certified to open it hire qualified teachers etc. but do not think that you are entitled to public funds especially when you have no intention of using those public funds for their intended use. The funding of private parochial schools is or should be illegal That being said, NOTHING absolutely NOTHING will happen here because too many rich and power people will make SURE that NOTHING will happen and the fraud will continue, THAT'S business as usual in New York, Brooklyn the Bronx, Manhattan and every other big city (New York and Chicago come to mind rather quickly). I would venture to guess that the FEDS have sucked enough tax money to complete build out an infrastructure for all the PUBLIC schools and libraries but due to their ineptness and criminal miss-management we continue to pay taxes and will continue to pay taxes. Once a tax is in place no one is going to vote to rescind it. They don't know how to say no to spending money that isn't there. | |
| | TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY |
And to think in the beginningWhen all of this communication stuff started, roughly 100 years ago, it was the US Army that controlled most everything. Of course it was mostly all RF back them but it was Herbert Hoover that set up what would become the FCC which was run by hard nosed engineers that if a radio station dropped an "F" bomb on the air the forces of FCC doom instantly landed upon them. Stuff like BPL would have been laughed out of the building. The FCC was gutted during the Reagan administration much of that engineering staff was gone. When it was discovered the vast amounts of money that could be had selling off what should have been rented and the political goodies that could be had because of this during the Clinton Administration The political suck-asses we have now moved in with their "what's in it for me" mind set thus we have the current FCC. Maybe it is time to give it back to the Army. | |
|
|
AnonMe
Anon
2013-Feb-21 1:53 am
FCC - How can this group be so screwed up??How is it that it seems everything that the FCC (or my state's PUC for that matter) is involved in is so damn screwed up? Constantly finding huge gaping holes where they are not performing their basic functions as an organization, yet nothing is ever done about it.
The FCC has responsiblities that affect huge sums of money for consumers and as in this case, other organizations (funded by consumers), yet they don't ever seem to get it right?
When is are we going to see something change with them so they actually work for the people, and for the betterment of the country as a whole? | |
| |
FactChecker
Anon
2013-Feb-22 11:55 am
Errors in this pieceCurrently about 26% of USF is used for E-Rate, not 40%. » transition.fcc.gov/Daily ··· 14A1.pdfThe E-Rate used to have a higher share, but since the E-Rate is capped and the other programs aren't, it's share of funding has dropped. You refer to "oodles of fraud" that "keeps bubbling up," but the links you provide are frauds that occurred in 2001 or earlier. Please show us more recent oodles. As for the "endless flood" of GAO reports, I can think of 4. Could you provide links to the rest of the flood? I'll agree that the FCC has moved at a glacial pace on reform in response to GAO criticism, but that criticism is not tied to fraud in general. By the way, you missed another recent piece on Jewish libraries in the same communities apparently abusing the fund: » forward.com/articles/170 ··· subs/?p=Can you be more specific on how the FCC (and USAC) audit practices are inadequate? I don't mean just pointing out cases of failure, I mean proposing how the system should be reformed. What accountability requirements would be more than "minimal"? Can you give an example of a case where "money paid in...isn't tracked by the government"? I think you have read news reports about people stealing from the fund, but have not actually ever applied for E-Rate funding. Because people who have been through the process thinks that the program needs more auditing. | |
| | |
Re: Errors in this pieceCurrently about 26% of USF is used for E-Rate, not 40%. Thanks, fixed. It was 40% not all that long ago. You refer to "oodles of fraud" that "keeps bubbling up," but the links you provide are frauds that occurred in 2001 or earlier. Please show us more recent oodles. » lmgtfy.com/?q=E-rate+fraud» www.erateelite.com/news/ ··· wsID=360» www.pcworld.com/article/ ··· aud.html» www.fcc.gov/blog/houston ··· -settled» www.erateelite.com/news/ ··· wsID=401» www.infoworld.com/d/secu ··· rges-791» www.internetnews.com/bus ··· raud.htm» www.e-ratecentral.com/ar ··· 1229.aspYou're in denial if you think this isn't an ongoing problem. As for the "endless flood" of GAO reports, I can think of 4. You're kidding, right? Four GAO reports repeatedly showing the FCC fails to correctly track fund spending aren't enough for you? I think you have read news reports about people stealing from the fund, but have not actually ever applied for E-Rate funding. I've written about this stuff for twelve years now. I think you probably somehow benefit financially from these funds so you willfully ignore the problems with the fund out of fear that you'll lose money. Because people who have been through the process thinks that the program needs more auditing. On that we agree. To be clear, I certainly don't want to see the funding go away like the "all government is always bad" zealots. I just think it's repeatedly hysterical that the FCC can't correctly audit spending. | |
| | | |
FactChecker
Anon
2013-Feb-22 4:09 pm
Re: Errors in this pieceThanks for the reply. Some of your links in your list duplicated the same fraud. You can find a better list of people who've been caught defrauding the program here: » www.usac.org/sl/about/pr ··· nts.aspxThat list is also duplicative, so without going through and counting, I'd say we're looking at less than 40 cases of fraud since 1998. That doesn't seem like oodles to me. That's an average of less than 3/year, out of over 20,000 applications/year. If my Oodles of Noodles only had 3 noodles, I'd feel cheated. But I guess oodles are in the eye of the beholder. The GAO reports were not all about how inadequate FCC audit practices are. 4 reports in 16 years doesn't seem like a lot to me, but again, I guess the endlessness of the river is in the eye of the beholder. Also, the GAO has repeatedly demonstrated a poor understanding of the program. Some of the reforms they propose would harm the program, not help it. In any case, USAC has hired an outside firm to review its compliance with the latest GAO report (from 2010: » www.gao.gov/new.items/d10908.pdf). It did take them 2 years to reach this point, though, so you're right about the pace of the FCC response. "I think you probably somehow benefit financially from these funds." Guilty as charged. Unfortunately, there isn't anyone who knows firsthand how audit-rich the application process is, but has not benefited financially. If you want to hear about the program from anyone who's actually been through the application process, it would have to be someone who's benefited financially. I can't believe I mistyped the last sentence. What I meant to say was, "Because no one who has been through the application process thinks that the program needs more auditing." I'm not ignoring problems in the E-Rate. I just don't think fraud in 0.015% of applications is "oodles" or that 4 GAO reports in 16 years is an "endless river." From my perspective, the amount of fraud does not justify the current level of scrutiny. | |
|
| |
|
|